Some residents want SAHA to stay out of Stone Oak

[johnsmith]

John, the first paragraph in my first post in this thread:



Learn to read.

This is the only issue in my mind. If this is the best deal available to SAHA or it makes financial sense, then by all means they should follow through with it. However, if it is simply someone on a crusade to move poor family's to the Stone Oak area then I believe it is foolish and the city better find a better use for tax dollars and spend them far more wisely.

So then what's your argument. You are against classism, but you are also against moving poor people to Stone Oak. Since there is no possible way this makes financial sense, how can you be against both of these things?

[JoeChalupa]

But one day.....one day. Peace.

[johnsmith]

Its good to see we're still making coherent arguments in this thread. Now 64 families are not only goig to drive people from Bexar county but they're going to drive us all into subsidized housing too.

She was implying that why should the Stone Oak residents bother with taxes anymore if the city is just going to move non tax paying citizens into the area without anyone being able to say anything about it.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

So then what's your argument. You are against classism, but you are also against moving poor people to Stone Oak. Since there is no possible way this makes financial sense, how can you be against both of these things?

Well, there is a chance this makes financial sense for SAHA.

Likely, no.

A chance, yes.

[johnsmith]

Well, there is a chance this makes financial sense for SAHA.

Likely, no.

A chance, yes.

Ok, then on the slim to zero far outside chance that this is the most economically responsible thing for the city to do, then he's alright with it?

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

Ok, then on the slim to zero far outside chance that this is the most economically responsible thing for the city to do, then he's alright with it?

I think so. I can't speak for Manny, but I really think that's what he said initially.

I just seriously doubt that this makes (and solely on financial sense for SAHA...forgo the socio-economic sense for a minute) sense for SAHA. Even if the units were dilapidated and infested with mold, I doubt the cost of subsidzing those homes would be worth it when they could probably get double or triple the amount of families in a different part of town.

And when I say different part of town, let's just say my area (NW Crossing-area). Again, not Stone Oak, but not lower income by any means.

[JoeChalupa]

I'm just glad we can all get along and still be friends even though our opinions differ and we come from different styles of life 'cause I'll be the first to shake Dirties and John Smith's hand at a GTG and offer them a bean & cheese taco and a Big Red.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

I'm just glad we can all get along and still be friends even though our opinions differ and we come from different styles of life 'cause I'll be the first to shake Dirties and John Smith's hand at a GTG and offer them a bean & cheese taco and a Big Red.

I don't think you'll have any left if you offer it to me first.

[MannyIsGod]

I'm for SAHA doing what makes most sense financially. I don't think the concerns of a few Stone Oak residents matter more than the concerns of an entire city.

[ShoogarBear]

I'm just glad we can all get along and still be friends even though our opinions differ and we come from different styles of life 'cause I'll be the first to shake Dirties and John Smith's hand at a GTG and offer them a bean & cheese taco and a Big Red.

You can stick your hand out. What you would get back is a matter of conjecture.

[SpursWoman]

Its good to see we're still making coherent arguments in this thread. Now 64 families are not only goig to drive people from Bexar county but they're going to drive us all into subsidized housing too.

Wow ... I guess the " " has lost all meaning.

[MannyIsGod]

Did you not read the initial post you ing moron. Its already started an uproar over just the initial phase. I doubt it will but if it does happen it will create a huge wave of pissed off wealthy people. Are you really so arrogant to see that most of the time you pull out of you ass with no meaning and value just to play devils advocate and feel like you know something that you really don't.

I have a HUGE .

[johnsmith]

I'm for SAHA doing what makes most sense financially. I don't think the concerns of a few Stone Oak residents matter more than the concerns of an entire city.

You for or against the toll roads?

[MannyIsGod]

I doubt that and we all know you're too scared to pull it out and tarnish you political career as a memeber of the monkey family.

I don't have a wide angle lense for my camera so I can't take a picture of it for you to drool over. However meet me at the Stone Oak HEB meat counter and we'll measure there. Loser gets it chopped off by the butcher. Deal?

[MannyIsGod]

You for or against the toll roads?

For.

[SA210]

now I'll have to see some poor shmoe who doesn't pay taxes lounging around in his Under Armor shirt yelling, "we will protect this house".

Educate yourself sir. Please. For your sake.

[MannyIsGod]

Wow ... I guess the " " has lost all meaning.

Sorry, I'm just being a .

[johnsmith]

Educate yourslef sir. Please. For your sake.

Hey dumbass, it was a joke.

[johnsmith]

For.

why?

[SpursWoman]

Sorry, I'm just being a .

A big one.

[MannyIsGod]

And yeah, its amazing how all of a sudden being poor equates to not paying taxes. WTF?

[MannyIsGod]

A big one.

Huuuuuuuuuuuge.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

Educate yourslef sir. Please. For your sake.

Today's Unintentional Comedy Award.

[MannyIsGod]

why?

Because we can't afford to build new roads otherwise. When managed correctly they pay themselves off faster and they reduce traffic congestion. WTF does this have to do with this thread?

[johnsmith]

Today's Unintentional Comedy Award.