Reply With Quote
Yeap Chump, it's one of those. 2cents is kicking your ass. And you are fooling no one with your intellectual dishonesty.
He didn't except his Blind Trust comeback which was proven not to be in place. If there was another "fiduciary" agreement in place he would have mentioned that, but he didn't.
wasn't an English criticism, but if someone else decided to chime in besides you I wanted to cover my hide. The reason I said that is because you can be a fiduciary and not have discretion over someone's account. I'm far from the authority on the English Language.For the record, you misused the word "infer." That doesn't help your claim as the final authority on the English language.
that's my 2cents, I'll let you have the last word.
Yeap Chump, it's one of those. 2cents is kicking your ass. And you are fooling no one with your intellectual dishonesty.
He said they were working under the terms of a conditional blind trust that were not yet finalized. It's easy for a person who knows how to use the word "infer" to infer the broker was authorized to make trades for Obama without his knowledge. You think there was no agreement whatsoever and that Obama is accusing his broker of violating securities law and what else -- iden y theft? Fraud? Which is easier to believe?He didn't except his Blind Trust comeback which was proven not to be in place. If there was another "fiduciary" agreement in place he would have mentioned that, but he didn't.There are all manner of fiduciary agreements. If a financial advisor or lawyer feels like further clarifying this, they are welcome. We apparently know what we area talking about now.The reason I said that is because you can be a fiduciary and not have discretion over someone's account.
you, whottt. Go not join the army and not fight a war.
Ok clambake...
There's nothing intellectually dishonest about my argument. 2cents says Obama was accusing his broker of breaking securities law which is ridiculous on its face. He did nothing to prove it and ended up confirming my contentions that his broker indeed could have had authorization to use discretion in stock transactions.
That's all I was getting at, whottt -- there was no reason to come out from under your rock to add absolutely zero to the conversation. Go back to your Jack Bauer fantasies or bombing Mecca while you polish the gun Daddy gave you because you voted for W.
Sounds like Obama wanted it both ways, which I don't
see as possible. Sounds a whole lot like the Clinton's.
Nah, I don't think the Clinton's would have tried to do the right thing in the first place.
Hey why are you getting pissed off at the judge?
I'm not trying to add anything...
I could end this debate in about 15 seconds if I chose...and I probably will when ya'll cease to amuse me.
But in the meantime...I just think it's funny that you were the one asking 2cents if he's ever voted for anyone...
Hedo>Manu should leave you with no doubts as to the point I was making...
Intelligence is not having to jump in front of a train to know it will hurt.
Hey why are you getting pissed off at the judge?You're no judge. You're a troll. Why not just use your lame troll name?
Never do.I'm not trying to add anything.Don't bother. It's already done. Go back under your rock until you find a major political candidate that will pledge to nuke Mecca.I could end this debate in about 15 seconds if I chose.
Fixed it.
That you are ready to lie again? No surprise.Hedo>Manu should leave you with no doubts as to the point I was making...Then you should know to go back under your rock where you've been since Iraq went to .Intelligence is not having to jump in front of a train to know it will hurt.
LOL you actually looked? LMAO.
I'm not trolling at this particular time, just giving my honest opinion as to who is coming off better in this debate.
2Cents sounds legit and you come off as selectively looking the other way for no other reason than to win this argument.
And I admit to being surprised at this turn of events since 2cents kind of got off to a rought start...
Never do.Don't bother. It's already done. Go back under your rock until you find a major political candidate that will pledge to nuke Mecca.
Guilianni and Clark both will...
Ok I'm done.
Now I'm going to sit here and enjoy myself again.
And hootie, just for the record -- you stopped being relevant a long time ago.
And you have pined for Hedo on these very boards.
You're now just a troll that amusing about once every 20 posts.
Go back to using your lame troll name so I can put you on ignore.
I wish you'd log onto a troll name also, so I could put you on ignore.
You can thank Yoni for that. He blew his chance.
I wish you'd log onto a troll name also, so I could put you on ignore.
And I don't even remember you, so you don't count.
Relevance is over-rated. I never came here for relevance.
True..and I'm also pretty happy with Manu coming off the bench...And you have pined for Hedo on these very boards.
Obviously you don't remember the details of that argument.
Too bad...because I find you to be immensely amusing in this thread...I actually feel guilty now for not returning the favor...I'll try to lose an argument badly so you won't feel like you're doing all the heavy lifting...deal?You're now just a troll that amusing about once every 20 posts.
Go back to using your lame troll name so I can put you on ignore.
Which one?
Never mind...I'll go back to using one of the ones you don't know.
So you believe Obama is accusing his broker of violating securities law?2Cents sounds legit and you come off as selectively looking the other way for no other reason than to win this argument.
Yes or no.
S'okay, it's my bad...
I made an ass out of myself assuming a troll would follow it's own suggestion....
Nor do you, but it's convenient for you to lie about it, so you do.Obviously you don't remember the details of that argument.No one has to look up IP addresses to know it's you. The lameness is self-evident.Never mind...I'll go back to using one of the ones you don't know.
You consider everyone lame....
therefore all posters are Whott trolls.
Not at all.
You might as well be a whottt troll, though. Who are you?
Yeah, your posts are a sping of positivism.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
