Reply With Quote
I am constantly amazed at how many people reply to the troll of the political forum clambake.
He hasn't made a point in three years of posting in this forum, yet everyone hits reply when he posts.
i had no idea you were so enamoured with the past, except for the last 8 years.
logical.
I am constantly amazed at how many people reply to the troll of the political forum clambake.
He hasn't made a point in three years of posting in this forum, yet everyone hits reply when he posts.
wow, the last i heard from JS, he was stabbing his family in the back.
I havent been hear that longing. What you are saying doesnt surprise me
you should stick around a little longing
My bad meant to type "long"you should stick around a little longing
Anyways your comment about the past makes no sense. Your whole point is that why vote for a republican if in the past 8 years we have had a less than great Republican in offense. My point is that in the past we have had some pretty terrible Democratic presidents as well, should that hurt Obama. You didnt have a comeback so you just said some stupid line about being enamored with the past.
i was replying to your brilliant contribution about the past. you know, the point where you laid out your foundation.
and it's "office", not "offense".
my typos are reaching an all time high today, and so are your losing arguments
you're the one that said you fear the past but not really.
there's a solid argument
I never used the words "fear the past" I asked you "Should Obama be penalized for the failed presidency's of Carter, Johnson,etc..just like you want to penalize Mccain for Bush's presidency?" You have still not answered it by the way. You have twisted my words and made stuff up just like a politician.you're the one that said you fear the past but not really.
there's a solid argument
The difference is that the assholes here, Yoni leading the stink, will not vote for ANYBODY _named_ HUSSEIN! because that means they aren't "American", or American enough, or that they are Muslim, of Sharia-promoing, or ... "just because".
Dissenting against head, not because he's an old, wealthy, insider whitey/plutocrat/kleptocrat but because of his ACTIONS in govt is totally different. Same with dubya and all his other accomplices.
A person's name or skin color or even ing political party don't make a bit of difference to me. Just do the ing job you were elected to do.
If HUSSEIN! s up, or does not attempt to reverse the dubya/ head ups, then he won't have my support, either, but not because his name is HUSSEIN! but because of his actions.
None of you simple bubbas can follow the distinctions I'm making, taking your boutons' -slappings like the wimps you are.
Isn't this about where my right-wing devotees gather 'round and have circle jerk in my honor, about boutons incredibly powerful -slappings?
God must love you bubbas, he made so ing many of ya!
sure, why not? don't take away half of mccains arsenal. i hope that is a large part of the republican playbook.
i don't want more of the same so lets stop punishing america..just like you want to penalize Mccain for Bush's presidency?"
is that answer sufficent? It's in your DNA to lean right.You have still not answered it by the way. You have twisted my words and made stuff up just like a politician.
Funny how I post well thought out posts about issues, reasons for voting for a particular candidate, and you just resort to name calling and cursing. Then you call anyone who doesnt agree with you a bubba? I would venture to say the average education level of republicans is higher than that of the democrats.The difference is that the assholes here, Yoni leading the stink, will not vote for ANYBODY _named_ HUSSEIN! because that means they aren't "American", or American enough, or that they are Muslim, of Sharia-promoing, or ... "just because".
Dissenting against head, not because he's an old, wealthy, insider whitey/plutocrat/kleptocrat but because of his ACTIONS in govt is totally different. Same with dubya and all his other accomplices.
A person's name or skin color or even ing political party don't make a bit of difference to me. Just do the ing job you were elected to do.
If HUSSEIN! s up, or does not attempt to reverse the dubya/ head ups, then he won't have my support, either, but not because his name is HUSSEIN! but because of his actions.
None of you simple bubbas can follow the distinctions I'm making, taking your boutons' -slappings like the wimps you are.
Isn't this about where my right-wing devotees gather 'round and have circle jerk in my honor, about boutons incredibly powerful -slappings?
God must love you bubbas, he made so ing many of ya!
Don't bother ...
i know you don't want me to bring this up, but the last 8 years would suggest otherwise.
There are few things more ironic or bizarre than having to listen to liberals talk about how evil and disgusting and bigoted and closed-minded and intolerant conservatives are, and then turn around and say how much the said liberal hates this group or that group.
It's a dramnatic difference if you include Boutons in the averaging process. Leave him out of the statistical sample, and republicans still win hands down.
I am talking about the average Republican voter as well. There are a lot more voters than people in office. I dont mind you bringing it up, but it is a stupid point because the millions of voters out there are a lot more than the number of people in bush's cabinet.
how did it become bush's cabinet?
Clambake if you took an average of the education levels and iq's of all the democrats and all the republicans, who would have higher iq's and education levels?
frankly i don't care, but if you want to provide some graphs and pie charts that would be fine. still not sure how that would apply to the decisions being made by this current administration. Obama will not fall into any of your research.
.. and if the company swore up and down the part was in fine working order and it was just your imagination that it was defective?
In each of those cases, the defective part was replaced by one of the compe ive company's.
This is called in political science, "negative feedback".
If your party puts forth a mediocre president, you lose the presidency. Carter, the Elder bush, Nixon/Ford, etc.
I see no point in rewarding failure. Perhaps 8 years in opposition will sharpen the GOP and focus them on promoting competance over ideological purity.
It seems that ideological purity matters more to the right than good solutions. Any listen to a few minutes of most conservative talk show hosts proves that to my satisfaction.
Why cant you answer the question? I never said it had anything to do with the current administration. Bouton said that republicans were too dumb to understand him, so I said on average republicans have higher iq's and education levels than democrats.
Is that why Mccain talks issues and Obama talks "change"? I think any reasonable person would agree that Obama is the ideological one in this race.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
