Reply With Quote
No but it shows there's an extremely high probability that it didn't happen. And it also shows collusion cannot be proven.
lol semantics. You know what the was meant by collusion.
No but it shows there's an extremely high probability that it didn't happen. And it also shows collusion cannot be proven.
panic?
Mueller was the only threat.
So why not just say Mueller found no evidence supporting collusion? Or, more accurately, supporting conspiracy?
Why say Mueller concluded there was no collusion when that's not what happened?
lol characterizing special counsel as a threat. he was doing his job.
Mueller was the only threat.
I don't know who you're panicking over, could just be that you've tied so much of your self worth to Donald Trump in the past 3 years that any negative attention grates at you.
Mueller was the only threat.
Weird since you were such a Kasich guy before. All that 4channing and pizzagate brainwashing really had an effect on you. Shame.
Mueller is a person who has his own opinion. I could care less what he thinks. But based on the fact there are no charges and report says there's no evidence I would say Mueller investigation has proven there is no collusion.
That is an accurate statement
I wasn't asking you. Or was I?
No he was doing his job, that didn’t change the investigation being a threat to Trump.
Seems like the ones
exonerated
was the media
crofl
He's a turd.
It's so weird that Trump has to stack the deck with Barr if the report speaks for itself in completely exonerating him.
Or that he would order Mueller's firing....
Reduced to name calling now.
Not as great a day as was claimed, apparently.
It's a great day. Lawyer boy from the salt mines in here flexing his legalese and the turd crew ting all over themselves.
: )
moar name calling.
You couldn't be any more insecure if you tried.
Yup. They really nailed it with their breathless reporting of Trump and his campaign coordinating with Russia and Wikileaks to disseminate the hacked emails.
And the feckless, chicken Dems cave on queue
House majority leader dismisses impeachment talk after Mueller report
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) doesn't feel any differently about impeachment in light of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.
Hoyer told CNN's Dana Bash on Thursday that "based on what we have seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point."
The top Democrat had in January called impeachment talk a "distraction" but said that "we'll have to see what the Mueller report says," per The Hill.
Now that the report is out, Hoyer still feels these issues should be
litigated at the ballot box in 2020 rather than through the impeachment process,
telling CNN, "Very frankly, there is an election in 18 months and the American people will make a judgement." Hoyer previously made this argument in March and told Fox News that
impeachment is an "extraordinarily all-consuming process."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has similarly said that
impeaching Trump is "just not worth it,"
per The Washington Post,
but she has yet to make a similar statement since the release of Mueller's report.
https://theweek.com/speedreads/83618...mueller-reportk
Hoyer hasn't even seen the redacted , yet, and he caves
What's Hoyer gonna do after he and his Dem/RNC ilk subvert Bernie yet again, handing re-election to Trash?
all these Dems to
^^ Still can't pay VY's fees.
your hero was
”collusion curious”
rofl
I said way back this was a big reach even though the way Trump acted in public made him reek. Way too complex for simple impulsive types.
Is anyone on the Right concerned that the Russians interfered with our elections and the WH either reuses to admit it, or is not giving info on what we are going to do to prevent future interference?
Or like Trump, you actually believe they did help him win thus you make up some BS about 3,000,000 illegal votes for Hillary?
relaxAnd the feckless, chicken Dems cave on queue
House majority leader dismisses impeachment talk after Mueller report
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) doesn't feel any differently about impeachment in light of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.
Hoyer told CNN's Dana Bash on Thursday that "based on what we have seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point."
The top Democrat had in January called impeachment talk a "distraction" but said that "we'll have to see what the Mueller report says," per The Hill.
Now that the report is out, Hoyer still feels these issues should be
litigated at the ballot box in 2020 rather than through the impeachment process,
telling CNN, "Very frankly, there is an election in 18 months and the American people will make a judgement." Hoyer previously made this argument in March and told Fox News that
impeachment is an "extraordinarily all-consuming process."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has similarly said that
impeaching Trump is "just not worth it,"
per The Washington Post,
but she has yet to make a similar statement since the release of Mueller's report.
https://theweek.com/speedreads/83618...mueller-reportk
Hoyer hasn't even seen the redacted , yet, and he caves
What's Hoyer gonna do after he and his Dem/RNC ilk subvert Bernie yet again, handing re-election to Trash?
all these Dems to
they will go down that road soon
first - get the full report and the grand jury info
then
mueller testimony
then the country will demand impeachment
all in due time
The avenging Christian Angel smiting the infidels.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
