Joe Rogan Thread

[vy65]

[Shastafarian]

^ follows the Michael Sonmore school of feminism.

Not being a feminist isn't the same as hating women dummy. Your grad program must have sucked balls.

Starting a thread about a C-list celebrity who gets offended by feminists isn't "not being a feminist", dummy. You clearly resent women. Was she ugly or pretty? I'm curious.

As far as the videos go, they're laughable. Grown men acting like little girls with regards to people who don't agree with them. The co-host from the first video is especially idiotic. They make no valid points. Their go-to reaction seems to be "Oh man" or "Oh jesus christ". They also don't seem to actually know what feminism is. They equate radical feminism with feminists who want equality for and empowerment of, women. Rogen even mentioned how he thinks "equality specialists" are A-OK.

equality specialists
backtracking when the phrase you make up sounds stupid
watching people eat penises

[Shastafarian]

What societal harm do feminists inflict?

[vy65]

Starting a thread about a C-list celebrity who gets offended by feminists isn't "not being a feminist", dummy. You clearly resent women. Was she ugly or pretty? I'm curious.

Where'd he get offended?

Only a Michael Sonmore type would equate posting Je Rgan Youtubes with resenting women. All dem drugs must've fried a circuit or two if you think criticizing SJW = hating women.

As far as the videos go, they're laughable. Grown men acting like little girls with regards to people who don't agree with them. The co-host from the first video is especially idiotic. They make no valid points. Their go-to reaction seems to be "Oh man" or "Oh jesus christ". They also don't seem to actually know what feminism is. They equate radical feminism with feminists who want equality for and empowerment of, women. Rogen even mentioned how he thinks "equality specialists" are A-OK.

This is WC level of trite stupidity. "But but but ... they're stoopid because their stupid."

Noticeably absent from this post is any mention of

a) how ed up university investigations of rape allegations are
b) how skewed our laws are directed against holding women accountable for making fake rape allegations
c) how little focus is paid on the rate of rape in prison vs. the relatively lower rate of rape in the general population
d) how poorly we deal with women who change their mind regarding consent after having had a couple of drinks with a guy
e) how many of the laws reflected in a)-e) constrain female agency -- something any feminist should oppose
f) how liberals ignore misogynistic attacks on women on the rate
g) how ed up divorce laws with respect to men

Guess you shouldn't have smoked that bowl while watching them Youtubes, Shasta. Now you can go back to letting Jamal pound your woman while you feel proud of being a fminist

burnout
feminism means cuckoldry
nothing of substance to say
homeschool
hasn't been lucid since the early 2000s
shasta

[vy65]

What societal harm do feminists inflict?

What does "societal harm" mean and which feminists are you talking about?

Those videos discussed some pretty specific issues. Do you not see how those issues relate to societal harm?

[Blake]

Lol Joe Rogan

[vy65]

[Shastafarian]

Where'd he get offended?

In the videos, dummy.

Only a Michael Sonmore type would equate posting Je Rgan Youtubes with resenting women. All dem drugs must've fried a circuit or two if you think criticizing SJW = hating women.

why exactly do you think I take drugs?

This is WC level of trite stupidity. "But but but ... they're stoopid because their stupid."

Noticeably absent from this post is any mention of

a) how ed up university investigations of rape allegations are
b) how skewed our laws are directed against holding women accountable for making fake rape allegations
c) how little focus is paid on the rate of rape in prison vs. the relatively lower rate of rape in the general population
d) how poorly we deal with women who change their mind regarding consent after having had a couple of drinks with a guy
e) how many of the laws reflected in a)-e) constrain female agency -- something any feminist should oppose
f) how liberals ignore misogynistic attacks on women on the rate
g) how ed up divorce laws with respect to men

Why don't you tell us about this some more then. Since this is your thread and you're trying to prove you're not scared of women.

Guess you shouldn't have smoked that bowl while watching them Youtubes, Shasta. Now you can go back to letting Jamal pound your woman while you feel proud of being a fminist

And there it is. Accusing people of being cuckolds. I have a feeling this is a classic case of projection. Thankfully I've never been cuckolded. How about you?

burnout
feminism means cuckoldry
nothing of substance to say
homeschool
hasn't been lucid since the early 2000s
shasta

meltdown

[Shastafarian]

What does "societal harm" mean and which feminists are you talking about?

It's a very simple question with a huge scope of answers to choose from. I'm shocked you dodged it.

Those videos discussed some pretty specific issues. Do you not see how those issues relate to societal harm?

No, please explain how feminists harm society.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

that list reads like "If I were a feminist this is what I would do."

The cliche is 'walk a mile in their shoes' not 'pretend they think just like you do.'

I think you're right Shasta. He must have mommy or ex issues.

[Clipper Nation]

What societal harm do feminists inflict?

Ask all the men who have been railroaded by a university kangaroo court and the court of public opinion because of a false rape accusation. Ask all the men who have been thrown in jail because of a false rape accusation. Ask all the men who have been taken to the cleaners in divorce court. Ask all the men who have seen their horrible ex-wife get custody of the kids because the woman almost always gets custody. Ask all the men who have literally been arrested for the high crime of "manspreading" on the subway, for 's sake. Third-wave feminism is misandry.

[Will Hunting]

What societal harm do feminists inflict?

Just a few:

• This country's unhealthy obsession with which famous male politician/athlete/celebrity isn't married or might be cheating on his wife. The Clinton scandal, for example, would have never been blown out of proportion if not for feminism.
• It can't be emphasized enough how re ed custody cases are. Even if the woman is a crazy who tortures her children, it's still a huge uphill battle for the man to get custody.
• The political correctness obsession we see is largely caused by feminism. It can be argued whether or not political correctness is a societal harm, but I view it as one.

[vy65]

It's a very simple question with a huge scope of answers to choose from. I'm shocked you dodged it.

It's a very broad and vague question. Why are you dodging clarifying it?

[vy65]

Lotta Michael Sonmore coming from the boognish and the burnout.

Sad that this country has reached a point where you can't criticize feminism without some got purse holder like the Vick crew accusing of projecting or having mmmy issues

[vy65]

And why are all the "feminists" in this thread so afraid to talk about these issues? All they've said is "lol joe rogan" and "you hate women." Nothing said of substance at all. It's really quite sad.

[Clipper Nation]

These white-knight cucks literally follow an ideology promoted by people who think they are "walking dildos" and "potential rapists," among other slurs, just for being male.

[Blake]

And why are all the "feminists" in this thread so afraid to talk about these issues? All they've said is "lol joe rogan" and "you hate women." Nothing said of substance at all. It's really quite sad.

Lol Joe Rogan

[vy65]

[Winehole23]

Ask all the men who have been railroaded by a university kangaroo court and the court of public opinion because of a false rape accusation.

How many people is that and how does "third-wave feminism" get the rap for lying accusers?

Ask all the men who have been thrown in jail because of a false rape accusation.

Is this a prevalent or statistically significant problem? Why such a crybaby over convicted rapists?

Ask all the men who have been taken to the cleaners in divorce court. Ask all the men who have seen their horrible ex-wife get custody of the kids because the woman almost always gets custody.

Paternalistic state laws are to blame here. Settled custom long before "third wave feminism." Woman takes the kids, man takes care of the woman. How is that distinctively feminist?

Ask all the men who have literally been arrested for the high crime of "manspreading" on the subway, for 's sake. Third-wave feminism is misandry.

Can you give us some idea of the scope of this problem? Once again, seems you're strained at a gnat and swallowed a camel.

[Blake]

Op needs the host of Fear Factor to articulate his thoughts for him

Lol Joe Rogan

[vy65]

How many people is that and how does "third-wave feminism" get the rap for lying accusers?

Is this a prevalent or statistically significant problem? Why such a crybaby over convicted rapists?

These are easily answered by simple google searches.

Specifically, in their analysis of sexual-assault cases at a large university, the authors found that 5.9 percent of cases were provably false. However, 44.9 percent cases “did not proceed” – meaning there was insufficient evidence, the accuser was uncooperative, or the incident did not meet the legal standard of assault. An additional 13.9 percent of cases could not be categorized due to lack of information. That leaves 35.3 percent of cases that led to formal charges or discipline against the accused. So there is obviously a lot of uncertainty here, a lot of he-said/she-said when allegations are filed. It would be a mistake to conclude, on the basis of the existing evidence, that nine out of ten assault claims are genuine.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...jason-richwine

Prevalent enough to be considered a social problem even though we don't have exact numbers, don't ya think?

Paternalistic state laws are to blame here. Settled custom long before "third wave feminism." Woman takes the kids, man takes care of the woman. How is that distinctively feminist?

Not with respect to alimony (but maybe with respect to child support). Do you have any evidence to back these claims up?

The point here is that so-called gender equality activists are notoriously silent in their demands for equality with respect to these divorce issues. What difference does their genesis make?

[vy65]

[Clipper Nation]

How many people is that and how does "third-wave feminism" get the rap for lying accusers?

Third-wave feminism has pushed the narrative of "listen and believe," in which the media and the justice system are pressured into not viewing accusations of rape with any skepticism at all. The "logic" behind this is that if rape was treated like any other crime, in which the accused is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty, female rape victims will be too intimidated to tell the police.

As a result, we have like the Duke lacrosse case, the Mattress Girl, and the Rolling Stone fake rape story, ruining people's lives forever on a mere accusation.

Is this a prevalent or statistically significant problem? Why such a crybaby over convicted rapists?

Who cares whether it's statistically significant? One innocent person in jail is too many in a civilized society. Why are you semen-shielding for injustice?

Paternalistic state laws are to blame here. Settled custom long before "third wave feminism." Woman takes the kids, man takes care of the woman. How is that distinctively feminist?

How is it NOT feminist to side with the woman 83% of the time regardless of the facts of the case? And even among the 17% of fathers who are awarded custody, only 40% are awarded support. And that small subset of fathers who get support are awarded less money on average than mothers.

Can you give us some idea of the scope of this problem? Once again, seems you're strained at a gnat and swallowed a camel.

http://gothamist.com/2015/05/28/mans..._crackdown.php

[Winehole23]

Prevalent enough to be considered a social problem even though we don't have exact numbers, don't ya think?

perhaps. 7 out of one hundred provably false out of one hundred accusations versus 45 percent did not proceed. sounds like the inability of assault victims to find a a remedy in the court system far outweighs false accusations as a social problem.

Not with respect to alimony (but maybe with respect to child support). Do you have any evidence to back these claims up?

To back what up? Putting kids with the mom as a default and making the man pay alimony is legal paternalism per se and the custom does predate third wave feminism. Just ask your father and grandfather.

The point here is that so-called gender equality activists are notoriously silent in their demands for equality with respect to these divorce issues. What difference does their genesis make?

CN blamed legal paternalism in divorce proceedings on feminists. He was wrong. If you want to blame someone for the lack of gender equality in divorce and custody issues, blame the double standard and traditional family values.

[Clipper Nation]

BTW, by no means am I saying that all feminism is bad. The original feminists, such as Mott, Stanton, and Anthony, were brave pioneers who contributed greatly to the progress of society. Modern-day feminists such as Christina Hoff Sommers still fight for true egalitarianism. It's the extremists of modern feminism (i.e. the Dworkins of the movement) who have co-opted the term to push a bigoted agenda.