Reply With Quote
oh yeah, forgot to mention before:
stay through the credits people, you get to see a setup for the next one. Looks like the next villain will definitely be The Riddler.
I heard the movie was so good people were high fiving each other.
oh yeah, forgot to mention before:
stay through the credits people, you get to see a setup for the next one. Looks like the next villain will definitely be The Riddler.
I won't be going to the movie on opening day for the simple fact that 75% of the people who are going to be going are going because everybody is going to go where they are going and vice versa.
nonconformist. i like that. way to take a stand.
thanks.
It's a shame Heath died, but it could have been worse: his last film could have been Broke Back, in which case he would have been remembered as the "guy who played the gay cow boy" and not the much cooler "joker".
It was a little unnerving when Bruce Wayne and Alfred kissed after the opening credits, but I can't believe they had an Alicia Silverstone Batgirl cameo. That ruined the whole movie for me.
You should've seen what they did after the closing credits.
Actually, no. I take that back. NO ONE should have seen that.
having nick fury ask batman to join the avengers over the phone was a bit disrespectul to batman.. i mean... at least meet with him in person... you gave that courtesy to iron man.
almost ruined the movie for me.
Batman struggling with his sexuality would make for an an interesting movie...
Which makes the after-credits appearance of Robin all the more interesting.
Maybe he'll think about going by "Doveman"
The Dovemobile?
about to leave my house to see this...
I'll watch it in IMAX tomorrow
The #3 movie of all-time at IMDB.
I know... ridiculous. I mean, I liked it and all, but its getting ridiculous how overrated its becoming.
it was very entertaining, but the film as a whole is overrated.
hate to say it, because i really liked it but i agree with ManuManiac and angelbelow about the movie being overrated. just got back and i have to say that i didn't bust a nut over it.
Nice.
I wonder who Nolan has in mind for the Riddler.
The Riddler is an awesome villain too ruined by the previous franchise.
fo real?
I don't get why that is so funny.
Come on man! You're seriously telling me you think this movie is top 3 all time?? what are you smoking?
That's IMDB's fault. That whole list is subjective on IMDB. Those are all fan votes and in the end all lists are subjective. The reason Dark Knight is tied for number 1 right is because the movie just came out and it's lived up to all it's hype so it's probably been getting 10's across the board by regular viewers and critics alike. In fact the lowest grade I've seen by a critic for this movie is a B- and his main complaint was that it was a comic book movie. Also another reason that list is flawed is that it combines every single type of movie genre, when it shouldn't. When I rate the Dark Knight I am not going to rate it on the same standards on what people review the God Father as, it doesn't make sense. Two totally different movies, one is an action comic thriller, the other is drama. Furthermore that list has Wall-E at number 26 or something........WTF. Point is that list doesn't make any sense at all , I will rank Dark Knight as the number 1 comic book movie, but to have a list that compacts every single movie genre into 1 and rate it is ridiculos. Also Dark Knights around 10000 votes whereas GodFather and ShawShank Redemption have more, it's a matter of time where people who want to perserve those spots start giving Dark Knight 0's to lower it on the list. So based on how the Dark Knight is and what it's main goal as a movie is, of course it's going to get a high rating for what it was trying to accomplish, and that is IMDB's fault for combining all types of movies in 1 catogery. It's like saying: I'm going to dismiss Rambo because of the lack of acting. That's stupid to say, because Rambo's main goal is not about acting it's about action and on that basis I would give Rambo a 9. The Dark Knight's has reached it's main goal of being a movie, so once again of course it's going to get high ratings. Also another example is Finding Nemo got a 9/10 and so did Shawshank Redemption, does that mean Finding Nemo = Shawshank redemption? No. It's what the movie was trying to accomplish, once again IMDB's fault for compiling such a list.
I went a little overboard
Last edited by Sherlock Holmes; 07-19-2008 at 02:19 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
