Reply With Quote
Petraeus is talking about extremists. Are you?
What ARE you talking about DarrinS? its never quite clear enough. Pretty convenient when you need to dodge the out of relevant questions, huh?
Is Petraeus basing his opinion on prejudice?
Petraeus is talking about extremists. Are you?
What ARE you talking about DarrinS? its never quite clear enough. Pretty convenient when you need to dodge the out of relevant questions, huh?
What do you think they will do, DarrinS?
Who are the extremists and what makes them extreme?
Well if you don't know, what the have you been going on about for all these years?
Do you regularly talk about things you don't know?
See, two can play at that game
Yes. Those that don't engaged in Sharia practices such as honor killings, stonings, and disfigurements, tolerate it.
They sure as aren't speaking out against their co-religionists.
I know, it's because they're Islamophobes like the woman on the cover of that magazine...
The peaceful Muslims are the battered wives of Islam. That's the only explanation. Well, that or, they agree with the practices and just don't have the stomach to engage in it themselves.
like I told DarrinS, it seems the sensitivity angle just went out the window huh?
Take a wild guess as to why people label people like you Islamophobic.
Glad to see where you're coming from!
Next thing you'll be claiming is defenders of the mosque are advocates of Sharia law...
No, my defense of why I oppose the mosque at Ground Zero remains the same. You guys are the ones that took the conversation to the wider question of how radicalized are American Muslims.like I told DarrinS, it seems the sensitivity angle just went out the window huh?
Take a wild guess as to why people label people like you Islamophobic.
Glad to see where you're coming from!
Next thing you'll be claiming is defenders of the mosque are advocates of Sharia law...
But, I see you're out of arguments.
Why do you not stand with the victims who approve of the mosque?
why is yonivore using the word fitna in teh wrong context? fitna means test or tribulation, not an act of thumbing their noses. it also has different levels of use, i.e. fitna at not commiting fornication or fitna as in times of warfare, economic or spiritual distress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitna_(word)
and also i don't think building a mosque is hateful or offensive in the same way that burning the one book that 2 billion people swear by and would take a bullet for is. I don't know about other people, but taht's just me.
seeing as though you've still to rationally address any of the ones I've made in this thread, that shouldn't really prove to be a problem, right?
and I didn't take the conversation anywhere, I asked you simple questions. I asked for clear answers, evidence, anything that would help me understand why you think the way you think.
Your answer boiled down to posting a picture of the muslim girl and a rant about how peace loving you think Muslims are not.
What conclusion do you think people are going to reach?
Shariah Index Projectlike I told DarrinS, it seems the sensitivity angle just went out the window huh?
Take a wild guess as to why people label people like you Islamophobic.
Glad to see where you're coming from!
Next thing you'll be claiming is defenders of the mosque are advocates of Sharia law...
http://www.cordobainitiative.org/?q=...-index-project
so i guess manumaniac, chump, and 10 other people in this thread are advocates of sharia law.
your logic is worse than a trolls and your thoughts/opnions just suck man. lol pistons
Hm... I didn't think conservatives played the victim card.
The mind=blowing thing is all of this drama is over what are probably nothing more than fairy tales LOL
"people in this thread are advocates of sharia law"
You Lie.
Alla y'all who think that christianity is perfect and doesn't have their own problems with extremists are lacking a bit of perspective.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=christian+witch+hunts+in+africa
The radicals may use it for an excuse, but you know what...
that's all it is. An excuse. they will probably carry out something anyway.
I think it's un-Christian for these so-called Christian to burn the Koran, but I don't see where it makes any difference.
Gen. Petraeus does. He thinks it may endanger US soldiers in theatre. But what does he know?
This preacher is a ing idiot. Embarrassing.
Yes, I know. I think he's wrong. They may use it as an excuse to act on current plans anyway, but I think they would act without.
Yes, he is.
On my drive home from work yesterday, I heard Lars Larson interviewing someone about this. He was adamant that the bible has verses saying to do so, and quoted them. Lars shot back pointing out that the passages he quoted referred to ones own personal belongings when they came to, or back to Christianity. Not to buy and destroy items in protest.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
