So many good questions and interesting points to make, so little time. Gotta go.
I think that is nonsense.
If one were to follow that to the extreme, the human race would simply cease to exist.
Children are *the* only real important thing in the world, IMO.
If one doesn't want to have kids, more power to them, and I don't think that is bad, merely a choice.
So many good questions and interesting points to make, so little time. Gotta go.
And if we were to follow your example to the extreme, we'd all be living in candle lit huts until every child had shelter and food. Right?
Additionally, if you care about children, why would you bring another one into the world? Shouldn't you be using the resources you have now to take care of the children currently in existence?
Well, I guess absolute values can lead to irrational conclusions...If I had a certain amount of money, regardless of whether it were enough to sustain life (whatever "sustain" is defined as at the time), I would likely have more than hundreds of millions of people.
That metric...having more than others is rendered virtually meaningless by the simplest of extensions. However, it's the lynch-pin of the the scripture you quoted.
Then everyone is immoral to some degree. In fact, it's human nature to acquire things. If you readily gave up all your stuff, you're pretty much admitting defeat in the "propagation of your DNA" contest, which is one of the most potent driving factors of all humanity.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)