ElNono wanted me to link a past example. I would be pleased to do so if I thought he would understand my attempt to explain things any better than he did in the past. Some people say the definition of insanity is to expect different results when doing the same thing again. therefore, I chose a different approach.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-20-2012 at 08:55 AM.
OK, tell me. What do you think of people when you repeat something, reword it, try your best to explain it to them, and they still get it wrong?Classic WC.
"It's obviously YOU being wrong, by not bothering to look at my positions or put yourself in my shoes!"
I hadn't really noticed or paid much attention to really make a comment but from what I remember I don't find them real extreme or unusual.
That sterilization is only in exchange for the government services. As a libertarian, i believe in personal responsibility. I hate the idea of forcing responsibility, but when the actions affect others... Don't those it affects g=have the right to do their best to see the action isn't repeated?
True libertarian policies only work when personal freedoms don't infringe on others. I have pointed out before in the Libertarian party platform that they recognize rules and laws are necessary at times. When someone sees my policy idea as extreme, when all I intend to do is stop the the responsible from having to pay for the irresponsible, I have to wonder if their idea of libertarianism is the extreme position of anarchy.
I see it acceptable in some cases. Too bad the world situations force us to take such action.
I suppose baking terrorists cakes, and trying to be nice to get critical information is as effective.
I see you didn't read the originating thread, or misunderstood it.
I advocated having both the father and mother of a child, that they conceived without being able to support the child, to be made such that they couldn't repeat the burden upon tax payers. Only in cases where in exchange for government aide, they be sterilized. This was never about sterilizing poor people like (probably ElNono) masterfully spun it in to.
LOL...
Finally followed those links. It doesn't surprise me that you went to that much effort to find them.
The famous "surgeon quote." So accidental in how much attention it received, but it will be timeless now. Won't it?
I think you forgot the one where I claim supporters of quota based affirmative action are racists, because they believe minorities aren't good enough to compete on a level playing field.
Isn't the proper definition of racism believing that one race is better than another?
Have you ever retracted it or apologized for it?
It certainly is.......
Republican Racism is an Air Raid Siren, Not a Dog Whistle
In 2012, Republican candidates are using overt signals, what are for all intents and purposes blaring air raid sirens and signal flares that race, whiteness, and American iden y are deeply intertwined. The appeals to white racism by the Tea Party GOP during the primaries are not background rhythms or subdued choruses. They are the driving guitars of Blue Oyster Cult's "Godzilla," the chorus of Jay-Z's "99 Problems," the opening moments of the Notorious B.I.G's "Kick in the Door," or the flipped samples of Justice's "Stress". You feel it. You know it. To deny the obvious is to close one's ears to a driving drum line and cadence that travels up through your shoes...and to your bones.
How else can a fair observer excuse away Republican arguments that blacks are lazy parasites, whose children should live in work houses and pick up mops and brooms to learn a work ethic, that "illegal" immigrants should be killed by electric fences, or Muslim Americans should be subject to racial profiling, marked like the "Juden" of Nazi Germany?
http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/153...paign=alternet
There's a search function on the board. All I had to search for was "black surgeon" and "stalking".
I dont' think "accidental" is the word I would use to describe it. "inflammatory" and "racist" would probably define it better.
I think you're free to have and voice any opinion you want to have, even if I don't agree with it.
That doesn't mean I think you're right, and will probably point that out too.
To qualify for government aid you need to meet certain income criteria, which vastly points to poor people.
So you're either trolling or terribly dumb. Looking at your post history I would guess the latter.
Still haven't read much extreme views yet.
going by this thread, the record appears to be thin. maybe the extreme thing is a red herring.
How did ElNono not make my top 10 politics poster list?
Now that is extreme.
Didn't you specifically request links?
I usually tend to think I'm not explaining it correctly, and then try a different tactic to explain it. I don't think that they are secretly trying to misunderstand it in order to aggravate or annoy me.
Not really. A lot of actions affect others. Hey, the bankers stole a bunch of money from us and bailed themselves out. I guess that means we should shoot all CEOs who need money from the US gov't, as that will prevent CEOs from borrowing money from the US gov't in the future.
It's extreme because, instead of just advocating for the abolishment of said program, or even some countermeasures put into law, you advocate government sterilization. I don't see how much more extreme you could be. Why not just, I don't know, deny more than one or two claims?
Many former interrogators have said that being nice is as effective at getting critical information. It's been posted multiple times in this forum, actually. I think other posters would be willing to back me up on that.
I left you 40 dollars of high grade smoke in the mailbox and all you can leave is a 20 dollar bill? no beer? Dam Joe your one tight vato I shall call you
JoeChajewpa from now on.
I don't know how anyone could look at this thread and not further brlive WC is just a troll.
Wouldn't that make him one of the greatest trolls in the history of these here internets??
there's your angle WC... go with it. Beats the alternative tbh
He's without a doubt the best. I hope to learn who it is one day.
Every TRoll has a name.
ST has private messaging.
Why should I?
The intent was to make people ask themselves if quota systems were OK. When schools have limited enrollment opportunities and take the best of people applying, then are forced to refuse some of those best candidates to the next qualified black, female, Hispanic, or whatever to meet a quota...
Is that right?
Just how far down the list did they have to go?
The best response back from that threat was they were still qualified, because they passed. How many of you make fun of president Bush's grades, even though he passed from a top notch school?
Is just passing always good enough?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote