lol of course your credentials are impeccable for this kind of thing.
Thought you said it wasn't about politics??
lol of course your credentials are impeccable for this kind of thing.
Everything is about politics with this dude.
I was wondering when this thread would be Godwinned.
I quoted a scientist who studies Ebola. You indirectly referred to me as an idiot. Someone that was not an idiot might figure out that I am quoting WHO, CDC, independent virologists and Ebola researchers. I am parroting what they are saying, while you are saying they all agree with you?
I could. Since that's not backpedalling at all, any backpedalling would be faster than that.
Still waiting for links from you.
The CDC link posted earlier basically renders any further discussion moot. Hickox is classified as "Some Risk / Asymptomatic" and therefore is not subject to mandatory quarantine. If you have an issue with it, take it up with the CDC, or this judge: http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/31/health...ola/index.html
The fact that you see that as any reversal of opinion is a testament to your lack of reading comprehension.
Just out of curiousity, which scienctist did you quote? What was the quote? And can I see the link? Just want to have all the facts.
The fan hasn't stopped turning, LMAO. We're still in the first quarter. Infections are still increasing in Africa. As long as they are increasing there, they are more likely to increase here. Your myopia is perfectly exemplified in stating "didn't" in the past tense. It's more than about her, and whether she is symptomatic is irrelevant as mentioned several times already. Restating a moot point doesn't unmoot it.
You can pound sand. I don't have to provide them twice. Start from the beginning.
[QUOTE=littlecoyotecoin;7644713]You will see that courts will hold up the quarantines as legal, so your whining that her rights are being violated will be in error as pointed out by the courts. [QUOTE]
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/31/health...ola/index.html
You didn't post any links.
So I guess "my error" was in fact not an error as the courts you said would uphold the quarantine in fact did not.
Unless quarantine has nothing to do with separating an individual from the public and restricting their movement.
Going on 30 minutes with absolutely no effort from coyote to provide scientific evidence for his fear.
I think I'll decline his offer of pounding sand thus far.
... you mean forcing her to remain in her home? The definition of this quarantine is pretty well known. What is your argument here?
You might want to read your link again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)