Reply With Quote
I'm here come or highwater.
If Trump can win, they can.
Its that tenuous at the moment.
No qualifications required. And if they could ignite the black and Hispanic vote you two don't show your asses on this board. That's the surest comment of all.
I'm here come or highwater.
Easy to say.
But the past tells a different story.
Repent yet again for your lies.
Explain.
Your complete absence.
Your need for others (Thread) to validate your posts.
Ask Thread about your Lord and scripture.
I see they're trying to prop up that pretend-black woman, Kamala Harris. She's even more pretend black than Obama ever was. But she's a woman with a minority tint; so, that's like a Dem dream.
I've been here since the Spring of 05'. Let us proceed...
Not on this forum with your vain ways.
You flourish when you find safety.
You can't stand against Romans.
You know this.
"Let us proceed"
Ypu got that from the scripture according to Thread.
Exactly.
puff puff give
You can expert or hope for it, but you would be disappointed since the country can't afford to run it efficiently as any other big government program mostly because of outrageous defense spending.
lol she even thought she had a shot at Texas and bought ad time and had campaign events here.
It was that bad after the grabbing video.
People forget.
fify
but it wasn't
There's tons of articles from the time that in retrospect show how right bb is
She was so busy charging ahead she left her flanks exposedFor Clinton's team, the desire is to not just beat Trump, but to trounce him. She talks about the choice in this election in moral terms, and her allies have talked of demonstrating that Trump's candidacy was rejected by the country in the strongest possible terms on election night.
Back in June, the head of the pro-Clinton superPAC Priorities USA Action, Guy Cecil, said, "We must not just defeat Trump. We must defeat him soundly, among as many Americans and in as many states as possible."
Given Trump's talk of a "rigged" election, the mission for Clinton might expand beyond just rejecting his message, to eliminating any doubt the GOP nominee may cast on the outcome of the race.
http://www.npr.org/2016/10/18/498376...g-to-win-texas
It was a moment in a long campaign.
Perfectly understandable why the Dems got excited about prospects.
Hindsight must be taken with a dose of the moment otherwise you learn nothing.
This was an extraordinarily rapidly changing campaign. And a very surprising result that all Americans must hold to.
Remember that half black guy who came out of the cracks to beat Hillary in 08? Remember 08 was supposed to be all Hillary. My point being it doesn't take long for someone to get a message out that resonates with people. We have got 3 1/2 more long years.
And if a plague ran in 2020, I'd probably vote for it over Harris and Trump.
Point taken.
Sure blame it on the blacks being lazy.Classic example of your stupid modern day dem who values multiculturalism over everything else.
it was Clinton who lost the presidency by ignoring the white vote thinking she could win with support from minority groups that have historically been too ing lazy to vote (betting your entire campaign on the hope that black people would magically develop a strong enough work ethic to wake up and vote at the same rate white people do).
Trump won the presidency by more or less giving the middle finger to your beloved minority groups and carrying the white vote.
Talk about giving ty excuses to the dude's lost instead of just saying yeah Bernie ed up by not campaigning in those states that could have made the difference.
You know you have no case when Bernie himself said how missed the opportunity to campaign in those said states to get his message out more broadly.
In your guy's own word, the old man was either too lazy to go to those places or he took a page right from under Hillary's book and was overconfident he didn't need them and only pandered to the white and young. Clearly that wasn't enough.
And this wasn't the general elections so why even bring that up? If you want to have a discussion about that then ok, lets have it. But this is about the democratic primaries where those states obviously mattered and in which he didn't care enough to go to.
No it's not, this entire discussion started when you said the Bernie supporters contributed to Trump's win in the general election and after BB pointed out how re ed that statement was, you pivoted to the primary and how Bernie lost because he didn't care aboutthe black vote
Bernie was also won the younger black vote in the primary (particularly the educated black vote), he lost the brain dead "muh muh Clinton muh preacher" vote.
Democrats need to scrutinize the Black vote more carefully, especially when it comes to the younger and more educated faction. That demographic no longer buys the notion that the Dems are their party. The Clintons certainly did not advocate on their behalf, nor did Obama for that matter.
Mike Pence Considering Running for President in 1820
WASHINGTON — Vice-President Mike Pence is seriously considering running for President in 1820, various sources confirmed over the weekend.
According to several prominent Republican donors, Pence is already laying the groundwork for such a campaign, outlining what he believes are the most serious challenges facing 1820 America.
In a conference call with donors last week, Pence reportedly said that, as President,
his No. 1 priority would be to repeal and replace the Bill of Rights.
He offered a sneak preview of a potential 1820 stump speech, in which he unleashed a brutal attack on the Bill of Rights’ author, James Madison, and called for the development of the telegraph key.
According to Harland Dorrinson, a donor who was on the conference call,
“Mike believes he’s the right man to bring America into the nineteenth century, just like he did for Indiana.”
But minutes after the rumors were reported,
the Vice-President pushed back, putting quill to parchment to call the reports “bunkum and balderdash.”
“America already has the perfect man to lead it in 1820, and that man is Donald J. Trump,” Pence wrote.
In Washington, some political insiders also threw cold water on the Pence-in-1820 talk, arguing that the timing was not right.
“Pence’s best shot was 1620,” one said.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/mike-pence-considering-running-for-president-in-1820
as always, your takes are hilariously wrong.
The youth vote mostly didn't vote after Bernie was out.
The leading, swint factor for Trash was his racism and xenophobia, blaming The Other for white sheeples' financial distress and absence of a future.
Trash's vote was split three ways
1/3 < $50K (your poor whitey sheeple, duped, conned, lied to )
1/3 > $50K < $100K
1/3 > $100K
Assange/Pootin and Comery were the real destroyers of Hillary, but she still won the popular vote by a greater margins than some Pres have won the WH
Mike Pence Considering Running for President in 1820
WASHINGTON — Vice-President Mike Pence is seriously considering running for President in 1820, various sources confirmed over the weekend.
According to several prominent Republican donors, Pence is already laying the groundwork for such a campaign, outlining what he believes are the most serious challenges facing 1820 America.
In a conference call with donors last week, Pence reportedly said that, as President,
his No. 1 priority would be to repeal and replace the Bill of Rights.
He offered a sneak preview of a potential 1820 stump speech, in which he unleashed a brutal attack on the Bill of Rights’ author, James Madison, and called for the development of the telegraph key.
According to Harland Dorrinson, a donor who was on the conference call,
“Mike believes he’s the right man to bring America into the nineteenth century, just like he did for Indiana.”
But minutes after the rumors were reported,
the Vice-President pushed back, putting quill to parchment to call the reports “bunkum and balderdash.”
“America already has the perfect man to lead it in 1820, and that man is Donald J. Trump,” Pence wrote.
In Washington, some political insiders also threw cold water on the Pence-in-1820 talk, arguing that the timing was not right.
“Pence’s best shot was 1620,” one said.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/mike-pence-considering-running-for-president-in-1820
lol at Pence openly admitting he is plotting against his current boss.
I didn't call black people lazy, don't put words in my mouth. I also didn't blame all black people, I just blamed old black Southern people who think taking political advice from a corrupt preacher is a good idea.Sure blame it on the blacks being lazy.
Talk about giving ty excuses to the dude's lost instead of just saying yeah Bernie ed up by not campaigning in those states that could have made the difference.
You know you have no case when Bernie himself said how missed the opportunity to campaign in those said states to get his message out more broadly.
In your guy's own word, the old man was either too lazy to go to those places or he took a page right from under Hillary's book and was overconfident he didn't need them and only pandered to the white and young. Clearly that wasn't enough.
And this wasn't the general elections so why even bring that up? If you want to have a discussion about that then ok, lets have it. But this is about the democratic primaries where those states obviously mattered and in which he didn't care enough to go to.
I meant that for Williams, my bad.
The black, younger generation no longer buys into the well my father and father before him voted this way so I better vote this way, too, like rjv pointed out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
