Reply With Quote
nobody is lashing out, just telling it like it is.
All this lashing out because you can't cover for impropriety. It's what you do.
nobody is lashing out, just telling it like it is.
And on the topic at hand, this ... first diagnosis of cancer was in 1999... shoulda stepped down a long time ago, while Barry had two terms going... but her ego is bigger than everything.
It was feminazi bull , she wanted thefirst female President
But she shouldn't step down now?
She clearly is all about herself...
By that you mean she isn't thinking enough about Team Blue.
You wanted the iden y politics.It was feminazi bull , she wanted the
Sandra Day O’Connor stepped down way before she needed to in order to ensure it was with a Republican President in office, as did Kennedy. Imo it’s a valid criticism that Breyer and RGB are a lot more selfish than their conservative counterparts.By that you mean she isn't thinking enough about Team Blue.
If she didn't care, she would've retired in 1999, or any time later... that's what I mean. She had a number of cancer diagnosis. First in 1999, then in 2009... she clearly doesn't care.By that you mean she isn't thinking enough about Team Blue.
It's fair to criticize her past decisions but she's a ing hero for sticking it out right now. It's unfortunate she can't just retire and live her last few months in relaxation like anyone else in her state should be able to do. She has to keep working to keep an immoral Senate majority from eroding civil rights for the next 30+ years.
Chumpettes want their cake and to eat it too. Ya'll complained that Kavanaugh was too frank in calling out Team Blue in their efforts to sabotage his nomination. But you think these judges need to abide the team construct.
But if you throw the team stuff out of it, I go back to what you said earlier. People her age lack the vitality to do this job and are selfish in the first place. The fact that we have all these seventy plus year-olds in government is troubling. Term limits all way. These fossils need to lay in the ground. They had their day. Go enjoy the sunset like they're supposed to.
You serious? , should have stepped down 11 years ago.It was feminazi bull , she wanted the
Last edited by baseline bum; 07-18-2020 at 11:25 PM.
They're already going to do that, right now all we got is to hope one of Thomas or Allito, pulls a Scalia. Instead of both
See, you think she's supposed to care about your feelings / politics. And then later on you're going to pretend that these judges are impartial as you cite cases after case that supports your politics.
I agree that she appears to give zero s in any event. The court trying cases with eight judges because she thinks the world is supposed to revolve on her axis is very selfish. Hyper partisan s like Sadbert obviously don't agree. He's happy counting his beans.
I don't think anybody should care about my feelings, at all. As I said earlier, I would much a prefer mandatory age cap, where they're forced to retire, and whatever administration gets the spot, gets it.See, you think she's supposed to care about your feelings / politics. And then later on you're going to pretend that these judges are impartial as you cite cases after case that supports your politics.
I agree that she appears to give zero s in any event. The court trying cases with eight judges because she thinks the world is supposed to revolve on her axis is very selfish. Hyper partisan s like Sadbert obviously don't agree. He's happy counting his beans.
However, I keep hearing from the resident Joe s that we really, really need to vote for him because muh SCOTUS pick, but this is only largely a problem because this selfish didn't do what she was supposed to do back in the day.
So now they're praying she'll make it to January next year, and it didn't need to be this way.
Oh no the world ends with eight judges? You didn't have a problem with it when McConnell was making that call.See, you think she's supposed to care about your feelings / politics. And then later on you're going to pretend that these judges are impartial as you cite cases after case that supports your politics.
I agree that she appears to give zero s in any event. The court trying cases with eight judges because she thinks the world is supposed to revolve on her axis is very selfish. Hyper partisan s like Sadbert obviously don't agree. He's happy counting his beans.
Agism is a bad idea. If for some reason, nominating a 70-year-old is worthwhile, then okay. But term limits will largely weed out these skeletons masquerading as judges though; it's an all too prevalent reality at this point.
I just don't sympathize that your ability to legislate from the court could be hindered. But like I say, RGB is a selfish nonetheless.
While we're adding term limits, change the law to not allow for it. But I can't say I gave two s that he blocked Obama from putting a third hack on the court. Frankly, it's one of the few good things he ever did.
Of course you don't give two s since it gave Trump the chance to put a hack on the court.
Hacks compared to what Obama put? No.
But the glaring truth is that Democrats just didn't give a because they were convinced 2016 was in the bag anyways.
Democrats did give a they got their seat stolen. Hopefully if they win this fall they'll start packing the court since McConnell has shown there is nothing sacred about the number 9.
I don't like term limits when it comes to the SCOTUS. It's a difficult job as it is, and experience is a key factor, IMO. I'm more inclined for term limits in Congress.
Nah. We don't need to be stuck with any of these self-important blowhards for decades upon decades.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions