Reply With Quote
GLOBAL CLIMATE CRISIS
World's scientists bought off by Soros?
GLOBAL CLIMATE CRISIS
OOOOO she sounds just like this sassy latina chick who was on Dr. Phil this one time!
Guyz I made a tweet I hope Citizen X likes it.
Soros bought off NASA, too
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
It's sadly ironic because the other 3% is comprised of a lot of scientists who are bought by Koch Industries and Exxon Mobile.
Already posted in the climate change thread, but a good watch:
So why do you think he's right and the vast majority of scientists are wrong? He doesn't seem like an individual who practices good science:
https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...says-earth-ha/
He's basically saying nothing is happening now that wasn't happening 20 million years ago. It's just weather patterns. That's really all you need to know.
"CO2 and temperature are out of synch more often that they are in synch which means there is no proof of a cause/effect relationship."
It means you should stick to trollin' upstairs. Now go on - get.What the does that even mean?
No, explain what that means.
Why don't other scientists agree?
Also, even if you don't believe in global climate change, why not curb carbon emissions for a more practical purpose of reducing smog and pollution? Or recycling and reusing for the purpose of reducing waste and garbage? Conservative really have no legit reason to be against "going green" other than they have to be against it because it's a cause associated with liberals.
It means there are no correlations between the two until proven otherwise, thus man made emissions have no effect on the temperature.
Global warming conspiracy theorists always ing cherry picking that 1998 starting point to pretend there has been no warming recently.
Ted Cruz used to use that 1998 baseline in all his arguments too.
The Earth is warming. Fact.
The Earth will cool down at some point. Fact.
These are natural weather patterns, but doom and gloom is profitable $$$.
Dr. Moore then veers from the present to the deep past. He recounts “an Ice Age occurred 450 million years ago, when CO2 was 10 times higher than today.” If CO2 causes warming, and was abundant, he wonders why there was an “Ice Age”? We know much less about Earth was like 450 million years ago and thus our models of that time are crude compared with our understanding of the present. Oddly, Dr. Moore’s skepticism of modern climate models is missing when discussing the climate 450 million years ago. Nevertheless, we know plants colonized land at that time, and think they helped suck enough CO2 out of the air to cause global cooling. It’s one of few times organisms radically changed Earth’s chemistry. Humans are doing the reverse now. Caveat emptor.
Climate model no good for predicting 50 years into the future.
Climate model good for guessing what happened 450 million years ago.
https://www.providencejournal.com/op...ng-deniers.ece
I'm a diabetic - to control diabetes, I eat mostly meat and vegetables and you want to address beef consumption? No beef and no cheese (or milk/yogurt which I don't consume - too many carbs). I could not control my diabetes on a vegan diet - beans - too much carb and not enough fat - even discounting it needs rice to complete the protein. Not to mention the whole business of you telling me what to eat - smh
Consensus is a political word ("vast majority"). All clearly explained in the video ^
off Wild Cobra, no one cares about your beetus.
Beef ain't the problem - that'd be refined wheat, corn, sugar, rice, etc. (carbs).
She doesn't have much common sense to come up with this GND.
Processed foods and glyphosate are the problem. Corn syrup is highly addictive and is in almost EVERYTHING.
It's the reverse actually. Moving toward a green society threatens profits of just about every industry on Earth. That's why there's such a resistance toward it. No more iPhones and other cheap garbage from China every year. No more fast fashion. Massive reduction in plastic use across the board. More re-using and repairing. More walking, biking, and use of public transportation in lieu of driving. Obese Americans not being able to eat their typical 30 pounds of beef and pork every week. The transition won't be comfortable, which is also why there's such resistance against it. Americans have become used to a lifestyle of buying the new iPhone every 6 months, driving around an SUV on the city streets, and eating their weight in meat every month.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
