Page 66 of 82 FirstFirst ... 165662636465666768697076 ... LastLast
Results 1,626 to 1,650 of 2045
  1. #1626
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I was mulling over a Kawhi + filler for Deng and Waiters deal, but then I saw Deng's salary. I thought it was something like $11M but dayum, it's $14.3M. Him and Waiters make a combined $18M and the Spurs can't get close enough to that without throwing in the entire bench, probably including Diaw. So nevermind on that.

    If Wilson Chandler can be had he'd be a great get. Only two more seasons on his contract after this one, the last one only $2M guaranteed. I wouldn't give up Kawhi for him (for both Chandler and Faried, though...?), but definitely anyone outside the top 7 and a first-rounder would be expendable for him.
    Yeah, Deng was never really an option. Maybe a S&T in the off-season. I think Chandler as the seventh or eighth man in the utility role would be a godsend. He can handle the ball well enough to run a bit of offense, but he's bit enough to put on David West, Lee and Ibaka. Not to mention he's athletic and can shoot. He could spot-start at three positions. He would have been incredible to have had the past month.

  2. #1627
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    The Spurs aren't trading Leonard. He's part of the Spurs youth movement moving beyond the post-Duncan era. The Spurs FO, particularly RC Buford, would look incredibly stupid trading away George Hill for three years of Leonard. Talk about absurdity. Some of you are actually responding to this possibility.

  3. #1628
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115

  4. #1629
    Veteran RD2191's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    51,864
    The Spurs aren't trading Leonard. He's part of the Spurs youth movement moving beyond the post-Duncan era. The Spurs FO, particularly RC Buford, would look incredibly stupid trading away George Hill for three years of Leonard. Talk about absurdity. Some of you are actually responding to this possibility.

  5. #1630
    Believe (in Bertans) ABC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    390

  6. #1631
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Wilson Chandler would be an unbelievable get, but I don't see why Denver would trade him. He's a very talented 2-way SF on a reasonable contract and they are only 5-6 games out of the playoff picture. Not only that, but Gallo is out for the year and they have very little SF depth.

    Would be a great fit, about as perfect as it could get, but I don't see why Denver would move him. I also can't imagine the Spurs being the one to offer the best package if it were believed he would be available.

  7. #1632
    Mostly good takes Dverde's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    4,162
    The Spurs have the bulk of their money in Parker, Duncan, and Ginobili and they are all untouchables right now. They are not going to get Deng, Carmelo Anthony, Pau Gasol or anyone else with a large salary period. I don't see trading Leonard unless they are higher on Jeff Green, Evan Turner, Thad Young, or Dion Waiters. I doubt they are.

  8. #1633
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Jason Thompson! Love this dude's game. Just a dream though. Sorry Spurs Fans but the team we have is the one we are rolling with. No one is getting traded. They are just waiting for Kawhi and Green to comeback so they can release Brown.
    Ahem!

  9. #1634
    Believe. DapDaGenius's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    2,753
    The Spurs aren't trading Leonard. He's part of the Spurs youth movement moving beyond the post-Duncan era. The Spurs FO, particularly RC Buford, would look incredibly stupid trading away George Hill for three years of Leonard. Talk about absurdity. Some of you are actually responding to this possibility.
    Youth was another thing I meant to mention, as far as that Leonard trade article goes. Also, are you really a Cavs fan?

  10. #1635
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Youth was another thing I meant to mention, as far as that Leonard trade article goes. Also, are you really a Cavs fan?
    No. I grew up in Ohio though.

  11. #1636
    Veteran szkorhetz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,128
    Guys, are you serious?
    Riight at the moment, all things considered(not counting injuries); Chandler>>(>)Leonard.

  12. #1637
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Wilson Chandler would be an unbelievable get, but I don't see why Denver would trade him. He's a very talented 2-way SF on a reasonable contract and they are only 5-6 games out of the playoff picture. Not only that, but Gallo is out for the year and they have very little SF depth.

    Would be a great fit, about as perfect as it could get, but I don't see why Denver would move him. I also can't imagine the Spurs being the one to offer the best package if it were believed he would be available.
    Denver is nearing the situation Memphis was in last season, but without the contending core. They are a lottery team despite having a few strong pieces. In other words, they should take advantage of the situation and tank. Also, Chandler is a championship role-player, not a building block. They have no reason to keep him.

    Now can the Spurs get outbid? Yeah, but I don't think it's likely if SA really wants him. A lot of teams are missing picks or are out of position to go for a final piece. I mean, who do you think would actually put in a better offer?

  13. #1638
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Sounds plausible, but doesn't that solve one problem and create another?
    I think it solves a problem and still allows us the opportunity to solve another. We upgrade our big man core. A Duncan-Faried-Diaw-Splitter-Leonard rotation would be among the best (possibly the best) in the league. Belinelli and Mills both would essentially be competing for minutes. With Green likely playing a big role (assuming we play GSW, POR, Houston, or OKC), there is but only so many minutes at SG with Manu splitting some time at SG and SF.

    Faried is a good rebounder and athletic as well. He'd be great in a "Dejaun Blair role" starting each half and logging about 20 mpg as a starter. Would allow both Splitter and Diaw to come off the bench, bolstering our bench unit

    It also leaves us with Bonner and De Colo who could bring back a salary at around $8 million. Or we could make smaller deals for a backup SF like Aminu, Singeton, Dunleavy Jr.

  14. #1639
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495

  15. #1640
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    9 days till trade deadline

  16. #1641
    I want some NASTY! SpurPadre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    14,324
    9 days till trade deadline
    AKA 9 days till the bull rumors stop and we accept the fact that we'll roll with the same team we see now, except healthier (hopefully, at least).

  17. #1642
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Denver is nearing the situation Memphis was in last season, but without the contending core. They are a lottery team despite having a few strong pieces. In other words, they should take advantage of the situation and tank. Also, Chandler is a championship role-player, not a building block. They have no reason to keep him.

    Now can the Spurs get outbid? Yeah, but I don't think it's likely if SA really wants him. A lot of teams are missing picks or are out of position to go for a final piece. I mean, who do you think would actually put in a better offer?
    I have not seen any evidence to say Denver has decided to tank and not push for playoffs. They are still within striking distance and I highly doubt a team with a new coach, with a team that just made the playoffs, would elect to not push for it. While I don't disagree that they should probably tank, most teams don't appear to think that way. They may very well think they are closer by making a few moves (moving Faried who may net them a nice asset) along with getting Gallo healthy (for next year). If that is the case, Wilson is a very good piece to help them make the playoffs which is probably their goal IMO.

    With regards to what teams would want Wilson Chandler and could outbid the Spurs? I think there would be a few maybe and it wouldn't just be teams who are contending this year. Teams like CHI who probably feel with Rose coming back and a few other moves they are right back in contention could be buyers. That's more of a holistic view, but specifically I would say at least 3 teams could outbid the Spurs and have a need:

    1) ATL: They are making a playoff push even without Horford. They are weaker at SF than anywhere and have a coach who values 3/D. They have a few picks this year that could be better than the Spurs as well.

    2) CHI: Not a likely candidate on the surface, but they fit the mold I described above. They are a team that while they appear to be rebuilding have the assets (draft picks, players getting healthy & possible cap space) to get back in the mix quite quickly. They likely didn't want to let Deng go, but he was expensive and it netted them a pick. Wilson would be a good fit for cheaper.

    3) Suns: This is the team I would say could easily outbid. They have several nice picks acquired, appear to be headed for the playoffs and could use not only a 3/D SF (their weakest position IMO), but a veteran. Their training staff is great which is good news for Wilson and they could be big time buyers.

    There are probably 1 or 2 more, but that is all I could come up with at the moment.

  18. #1643
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    I think it solves a problem and still allows us the opportunity to solve another. We upgrade our big man core. A Duncan-Faried-Diaw-Splitter-Leonard rotation would be among the best (possibly the best) in the league. Belinelli and Mills both would essentially be competing for minutes. With Green likely playing a big role (assuming we play GSW, POR, Houston, or OKC), there is but only so many minutes at SG with Manu splitting some time at SG and SF.

    Faried is a good rebounder and athletic as well. He'd be great in a "Dejaun Blair role" starting each half and logging about 20 mpg as a starter. Would allow both Splitter and Diaw to come off the bench, bolstering our bench unit

    It also leaves us with Bonner and De Colo who could bring back a salary at around $8 million. Or we could make smaller deals for a backup SF like Aminu, Singeton, Dunleavy Jr.
    Belinelli wouldn't be missed but I can't find a working scenario that allows Denver to give u a cost controlled productive 24 year old PF for a backend 1st rounder and Beli. Even with rebuilding, young, cost controlled assets are hard to find and with the players Denver would be receiving, I don't think it would be worth it.

    I'm not sure how the talks between them and the Knicks are progressing but, if they're not willing to take Shumpert in a deal for Faried, I'm not sure what chance the Spurs have of offering them Belinelli. The Spurs would need to be part of a threeway.

  19. #1644
    Believe (in Bertans) ABC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    390
    I think it solves a problem and still allows us the opportunity to solve another. We upgrade our big man core. A Duncan-Faried-Diaw-Splitter-Leonard rotation would be among the best (possibly the best) in the league. Belinelli and Mills both would essentially be competing for minutes. With Green likely playing a big role (assuming we play GSW, POR, Houston, or OKC), there is but only so many minutes at SG with Manu splitting some time at SG and SF.

    Faried is a good rebounder and athletic as well. He'd be great in a "Dejaun Blair role" starting each half and logging about 20 mpg as a starter. Would allow both Splitter and Diaw to come off the bench, bolstering our bench unit

    It also leaves us with Bonner and De Colo who could bring back a salary at around $8 million. Or we could make smaller deals for a backup SF like Aminu, Singeton, Dunleavy Jr.
    I like it as long as there is another small deal done. I can see what you mean about limited minutes to divide up, but it's good to have options. If Green is cold and Mills is getting destroyed defensively, it'd be nice to have another option who can shoot. Losing Belinelli, and Bonner and gaining Faried and Dunleavy could make some sense, for example.

  20. #1645
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I have not seen any evidence to say Denver has decided to tank and not push for playoffs. They are still within striking distance and I highly doubt a team with a new coach, with a team that just made the playoffs, would elect to not push for it. While I don't disagree that they should probably tank, most teams don't appear to think that way. They may very well think they are closer by making a few moves (moving Faried who may net them a nice asset) along with getting Gallo healthy (for next year). If that is the case, Wilson is a very good piece to help them make the playoffs which is probably their goal IMO.

    With regards to what teams would want Wilson Chandler and could outbid the Spurs? I think there would be a few maybe and it wouldn't just be teams who are contending this year. Teams like CHI who probably feel with Rose coming back and a few other moves they are right back in contention could be buyers. That's more of a holistic view, but specifically I would say at least 3 teams could outbid the Spurs and have a need:

    1) ATL: They are making a playoff push even without Horford. They are weaker at SF than anywhere and have a coach who values 3/D. They have a few picks this year that could be better than the Spurs as well.

    2) CHI: Not a likely candidate on the surface, but they fit the mold I described above. They are a team that while they appear to be rebuilding have the assets (draft picks, players getting healthy & possible cap space) to get back in the mix quite quickly. They likely didn't want to let Deng go, but he was expensive and it netted them a pick. Wilson would be a good fit for cheaper.

    3) Suns: This is the team I would say could easily outbid. They have several nice picks acquired, appear to be headed for the playoffs and could use not only a 3/D SF (their weakest position IMO), but a veteran. Their training staff is great which is good news for Wilson and they could be big time buyers.

    There are probably 1 or 2 more, but that is all I could come up with at the moment.
    Maybe Atlanta. But they're not giving up Brooklyn's pick for a role-player. They certainly have some assets, but I don't see them selling the farm. Chicago isn't taking on salary this season because they are trying to avoid the tax, and they can't two-for-one trade, since they're at 12 players as it is. Plus, Chandler would take Chicago out of the 2014 FA hunt. Phoenix is loaded with wings and s targeting a big. How does Chandler make sense for them at all?

    Wilson certainly has a market, but it's not huge right now. This off-season may be another story, but as of now he's not going to drum up a bidding war.

  21. #1646
    Coming Off The Bench TheGoldStandard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    10,325
    Spurs standing pat... sink or swim with the role players

  22. #1647
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Maybe Atlanta. But they're not giving up Brooklyn's pick for a role-player. They certainly have some assets, but I don't see them selling the farm. Chicago isn't taking on salary this season because they are trying to avoid the tax, and they can't two-for-one trade, since they're at 12 players as it is. Plus, Chandler would take Chicago out of the 2014 FA hunt. Phoenix is loaded with wings and s targeting a big. How does Chandler make sense for them at all?

    Wilson certainly has a market, but it's not huge right now. This off-season may be another story, but as of now he's not going to drum up a bidding war.
    Well lets just agree to disagree. I don't think Denver would actively trade him and I really disagree that PHX couldn't use a SF. I highly disagree that PJ Tucker, Gerald Green and Morris is being loaded with wings for a playoff team.

    Regarding CHI: They could easily do a 2 for 1 trade and still avoid the tax by signing a min player afterwards depending on who they sent out. They were willing to extend Deng and that would have eaten their FA money as well. If they amnesty Boozer and replace Dunleavy with Wilson, they would still have a decent little chuck of FA money (about 8M).
    Last edited by DPG21920; 02-11-2014 at 06:50 PM.

  23. #1648
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Maybe Atlanta. But they're not giving up Brooklyn's pick for a role-player. They certainly have some assets, but I don't see them selling the farm. Chicago isn't taking on salary this season because they are trying to avoid the tax, and they can't two-for-one trade, since they're at 12 players as it is. Plus, Chandler would take Chicago out of the 2014 FA hunt. Phoenix is loaded with wings and s targeting a big. How does Chandler make sense for them at all?

    Wilson certainly has a market, but it's not huge right now. This off-season may be another story, but as of now he's not going to drum up a bidding war.
    What about Washibgton or OKC?

  24. #1649
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    What about Washibgton or OKC?
    Why would Washington want another SF? They have three they've invested a lot in. And they lack a pick this season.

    OKC has TE they can use. But they're near the tax and can't take on much salary. Sure, a deal can get done still, but they'd have to give upat least one rotation player (likely two) to get it done.

  25. #1650
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Well lets just agree to disagree. I don't think Denver would actively trade him and I really disagree that PHX couldn't use a SF. I highly disagree that PJ Tucker, Gerald Green and Morris is being loaded with wings for a playoff team.

    Regarding CHI: They could easily do a 2 for 1 trade and still avoid the tax by signing a min player afterwards depending on who they sent out. They were willing to extend Deng and that would have eaten their FA money as well. If they amnesty Boozer and replace Dunleavy with Wilson, they would still have a decent little chuck of FA money (about 8M).
    We can certainly agree to disagree. It's not like this is going to happen anyway.

    That said, I would think Phoenix likes their wings, since they are powering the Suns' surprise playoff push, along with Dragic. You don't blow that up to get a player having a worse season.

    Chicago can only do Hinrich (their starting PG) and Dunlevy for Chandler. Any other combination puts them above the tax. They weren't willing to pay the tax for Deng ultimately; they're not going to pay it for a lesser player. Also, I doubt the Bulls amnesty Boozer just to get $9 Million in cap space. May as well keep him for that much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •