Reply With Quote
NRA sweating harder than a republican when their cousin wears a skirt
NRA sweating harder than a republican when their cousin wears a skirt
Bernie Sanders out there with Hillary. Finally endorsed her.
He's giving her far too much credit and praise. I wonder if they worked out a deal that would put him as her running mate.
Trump is losing his on twitter.
Millions of young voters hopping on the Hillary Clintrain.
The gig is up!
Trump is about to be embarrassed
Polls this week on RealClearPolitics:
Tuesday, July 12
Iowa: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein Monmouth Clinton 42, Trump 44, Johnson 6, Stein 1 Trump +2 Margin of error: +/- 4.9
Monday, July 11
Nevada: Clinton 45, Trump 41, Johnson 5 Monmouth Clinton +4 Margin of error: +/- 4.9
Florida: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein JMC Analytics Clinton 42, Trump 47, Johnson 2, Stein 1 Trump +5 Margin of error: +/- 3.7
I guess there will be a bump for Clinton after Bernie's endorsement.
Why are they even bothering to add Stein and Gary on these polls? They're not players in the least.
I'm more interested in head to head matchup with just the two of them.
Because they are on the ballot.
why not the last two weeks?
Stein and Gary seem to be pulling evenly from Clinton and Trump - maybe a very slight more pulling from Clinton from what I've observed in the difference between polls with them and without. I thought that Stein and Gary got on most of the states' ballots but not all - I wonder which ones they didn't get on - hopefully all swing states.
because it's too much formatting. Something gets mixed up when I copy and paste - maybe it's my computer? You are very welcome to post 2 weeks' worth if you want.
Libertarians are going to pull from the GOP and the Green party from the dems. The smallest ratio above is 2:1 for lib:green. The other you've listed was 6:1.
Maybe if you wish harder and try breathing through your nose?
uh huh
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...lls/president/
Trumps been getting his ass handed to him.
I am not trying to fudge any data to suit any agenda as you are suggesting. In general, if you look at those polls that provide just Clinton/Trump head-to-head AND those with Stein and Gary, you will see that there is very little difference between the difference between Clinton and Trump - as I said, maybe a very slight more (only a point) from Clinton. I did not mean WITHIN these particular ones that I posted which don't have Clinton/Trump head to heads.
I posted only this weeks' polls because I'm having a problem formatting. What is your problem? I didn't include last Friday's which also has Trump ahead. If you want to do 2 or 3 weeks, go ahead.
Maybe I'm not expressing myself clearly:
Pls look at RealClearPolitics Thursday, July 7 - there are 2 Pew Research polls - one with Clinton/Trump head to head and another with Johnson. Spread in both is Clinton +9 - no difference. There are 2 Reuters polls - one with (spread Clinton +9) and one without Johnson and Stein (spread Clinton +11) - so my conclusion was that Johnson and Stein are very slightly drawing more from Clinton. Same thing on Monday, July 4th.
The candidates pull what they get. It's not otherwise equal. Your method is mindless.
Trump having any type of lead in Iowa is like Hillary having an type of lead in Giorgia or Alabama.
At the end of the day, Iowa remains blue, just like the previous couple of cycles.
I think Warren is the more likely running mate than sanders is. She clearly made some kind of deal with Clinton the way she stayed as neutral as she did during the primary.Bernie Sanders out there with Hillary. Finally endorsed her.
He's giving her far too much credit and praise. I wonder if they worked out a deal that would put him as her running mate.
Trump is losing his on twitter.
I took that as meaning that she was going to be impartial to the process. A deal would likely result in her taking a side.
Don't you agree that her staying impartial was essentially a victory for Clinton? If she came out and endorsed Clinton when sanders was still alive, the progressive wing of the party that worships her would view her as a sellout. This enabled her to keep her base but to still help Clinton.
If that is the case then what would her primary endorsement of Clinton be? Uberwinning? Spin a non-vote however you like.
As it is now, she prefers Clinton over Trump. Not that hard to interpret. Stein has zero chances of winning.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/0...-any/?mod=e2tw
Nearly half of voters in a recent survey said they had seen TV ads supporting Donald Trump in the last week.
There’s just one problem: His campaign hasn’t aired any, and his friendly super PACs have run very few.
Meanwhile, 52% of respondents said they had seen an ad promoting Democrat Hillary Clinton—just six percentage points more than the proportion who said they had spotted Trump ads. Mrs. Clinton has aired more than 20,000 TV ad spots since June 8, on top of more than 11,000 aired by her friendly super PAC, according to the Center for Public Integrity, which analyzed Kantar Media/CMAG ad data.
The survey, conducted by the digital marketing firm Fluent, illustrates the challenge that Mr. Trump has long posed for his rivals: He may not be running ads, but he is always on TV.
“I have a little TV in my office. If I put it on right now, I have a 75% chance of seeing him,” said Jordan Cohen, the chief marketing officer at Fluent. He attributed survey respondents’ belief that they had watched a Trump ad to Mr. Trump’s ubiquity on TV and social media.
Indeed, Mr. Trump has mastered the art of getting on TV without paying for it. His rallies are frequently carried live by cable networks. He often calls into the networks for interviews. And networks regularly splash his most controversial tweets across the screen for pundits to dissect.
The media-coverage tracker mediaQuant estimated that Mr. Trump has received more than $3.8 billion in such unpaid media exposure in the last year, compared to $1.7 billion for Mrs. Clinton.
Hardly a surprise. Clinton won't answer any questions from "reporters" unless they are soft ball and pre-scripted. She is predictable and boring as . Trump may up 1 out of 3 times but he will answer every question thrown at him. All the new outlets want to cover everything Trump says hoping to catch that 1 in 3 up. He is entertaining and "news".
"he will answer every question thrown at him."
He answers with lies 90%+ of the time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
