I didn't ask about muh bet.
I asked what you think.
You didn’t ask about my bet yet you keep quoting my discussion about my bet. Shoo.
Your post was admirable and pathetic at the same time.![]()
this is not muh bet thread.
I know you're completely shook and embarrassed today, but that doesn't mean you can't discuss the IG report in the IG report thread.
You got destroyed tbh.
Now you're trying to shoo away people who embarrassed you.
lol
You mean you broadened the scope to cover your ass when and if someone gets charged that had nothing to do with the IG report. Doesn't work that way.
BTW, Christopher Wray with the icing on the cake regarding the IG report and no one being charged with a crime pertaining with it's finding.
You lost twice today.
TSA is always in awe of my ability to use the search function
So TSA is a Trump man to the bone.
He's making fun of you for spending so much time pulling up claims he's made about an issue he spends roughly ten hours a day reading about on conspiracy forums.
great. so do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?
and before you say it, yes, i know there are more IG reports... most notably on the FISA process. but i'm askin specifically about this one.
How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the 'deep state' ammo he wanted
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/polit...ort/index.html
cnn fake news
You said no one would be charged, you set the terms.
BTW, Christopher Wray doesn’t charge people.
Which way did you think I thought this one would go?
Was anyone referred to the DOJ in today's report?
I’ll ask you the same question I asked Sperm, does the IG make criminal referrals in the initial report?
that didn't answer my question.
Dodge #1
do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?
Everyone's talking about today's report tbh.
Didn't see much in there but didn't read the whole thing.
5 FBI employees were referred back to the FBI in today’s report. Just like McCabe was referred back to the FBI in Horowitz initial report.
Was McCabe referred for criminal referral in the initial report?
they didn't in the mccabe case. they haven't so far in the clinton matter. i don't know if that means they would never include the referrals in their initial reports.
but you didn't answer my question
Dodge #2
do you admit that the IG report on the handling of the clinton investigation did not go the way you thought it would? exoneration letter, biased decisions, et al?
....and TSA indicates things didn't go his way by bogging everyone down in semantics and sour graping today's report.
More muh bets incoming.
It was a damning report. It’s too early for me to answer your question. I’ll wait for any referrals made by Horowitz to Huber before being able to answer your question. I know Strzok was referred to Huber by Horowitz, just not sure yet for what.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)