Duncan vs. KG facts.

[toosmallshoes]

Tim Duncan Makes His Team And Teammates Better, Kg Doesnt


/thread

That's a great point. If the Lakers, Minny, Pacers, Celtics trade goes through the Lakers will have not one, but two amazingly talented players who don't make their teammates better. I see that team turning out like a conversation where both people are just waiting for their turn to speak.

[Obstructed_View]

Still waiting for sunfan's explanation why individual stats and fan recognition mean anything when it comes to winning NBA championships.

I'm puzzled as to why you would think a Suns fan would know anything about what it takes to win an NBA championship. Funny that he left out Duncan's 27-14 record head to head with Garnett. We already know the Suns can't win even with more talent. What's KG bring to the conversation again?

[Obstructed_View]

The man has never in his career had a decent supporting cast.

Yet the ONLY team he was ever on that made it past the first round of the playoffs wasn't the most talented. Just so happens that Cassell and Sprewell are winners. Please see my earlier quote about talent. KG has a load of it, but that's all he's got.

[Findog]

Yet the ONLY team he was ever on that made it past the first round of the playoffs wasn't the most talented.

Most talented in comparison to what? That was certainly the most talented T-Wolves team. The KG-Marbury-Googs trio was a bit wet behind the ears.

[Brutalis]

If the Wolves are all about themselves, cannot win on a consistent basis, have a bad front office, or whatever... then it's Garnett alone who would know. So any talk on who is a better player in an NBA career you really can't mention Duncan along with Garnett for the simple fact that if you're a good player and want to win, you can try at least one team other than the Wolves he believes in so much.

It's his own fault, and will be compared to players like Kemp, Larry Johnson, Patrick Ewing, and so forth fame wise. Leave the Hakeem, Malone, Duncan, Robinson talk for the legends.

[Brutalis]

sorry if i just owned and killed this threads esophogas

[exstatic]

KG's balls retract up into his abdomen in the fourth Q, so I can see exactly why Sunfan has a Jones for him. He'd fit right in.

KG and Duncan have met twice in the playoffs. 2-0 Duncan.

KG has only advanced past the first round once, and has missed the playoffs for the last several years. A Duncan team has never failed to make the playoffs, and when he plays, they have never failed to advance out of the first round.

[TDMVPDPOY]

a pic of rasho holding championship trophy ends this debate straight away

td won with rasho

now why did KG couldnt?

[mavs>spurs2]

^None of that has anything to do with Duncan's supporting cast throughout his entire career.....

[dbreiden83080]

KG has only advanced past the first round once, and has missed the playoffs for the last several years. A Duncan team has never failed to make the playoffs, and when he plays, they have never failed to advance out of the first round.

That is a big thing for me with KG. I am not asking him to win a le but in the last few years he can't even lead those Wolves teams to an 8 seed. Duncan would have got them in the playoffs i know he would have.

[dav4463]

Danny White had better stats than Roger Staubach. Who do you want as Cowboys quarterback?

There are intangibles that makes one a champion. Tim Duncan has it. Kevin Garnett does not.

[conqueso]

According to Statsoverload.com, in head-to-head matchups between the Timberwolves and Spurs, Garnett has averaged 21.7 points to Duncan's 20.3, outrebounded him 12.1 to 11.2, averaged 5.1 assists to Duncan's 2.8 and shot 52.6 percent to Duncan's 49.1.

Oh, and Duncan had 251 fouls in those games. Garnett has been whistled 215 times.

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/colu...in0625-ON.html

So much for Duncan "owning Garnett".

Duncan vs. Garnett career stats: Regular Season

(min) - (pts) - (reb) - (fgm)/(fga) - (PF)
***************Duncan****************Garnett********
1997/11/11: 35 - 22 - 09 - 09/13 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 04 - 06/15 - 2
1997/11/15: 41 - 15 - 17 - 05/08 - 4 *** 38 - 26 - 06 - 09/20 - 4
1998/02/14: 36 - 28 - 19 - 10/20 - 4 *** 40 - 25 - 11 - 11/22 - 4
1998/03/18: 37 - 20 - 12 - 07/14 - 3 *** 43 - 16 - 10 - 07/21 - 3
1999/02/06: 37 - 22 - 14 - 07/18 - 4 *** 32 - 19 - 16 - 08/23 - 6
1999/02/09: 42 - 08 - 11 - 02/10 - 2 *** 43 - 12 - 12 - 06/25 - 4
1999/02/22: 40 - 10 - 12 - 04/10 - 2 *** 42 - 14 - 11 - 07/19 - 4
1999/04/14: ***************************DNP (flu)*******
2000/01/04: 43 - 27 - 19 - 10/17 - 1 *** 39 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 4
2000/01/27: 37 - 20 - 14 - 08/19 - 3 *** 39 - 26 - 08 - 12/25 - 2
2000/02/27: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/03/02: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/11/02: 39 - 24 - 09 - 10/15 - 4 *** 40 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 5
2000/11/17: 44 - 22 - 14 - 11/25 - 3 *** 45 - 32 - 12 - 12/18 - 5
2001/02/16: 47 - 26 - 12 - 07/19 - 2 *** 45 - 31 - 16 - 12/24 - 5
2001/03/14: 49 - 23 - 20 - 08/14 - 3 *** 41 - 24 - 13 - 08/20 - 5
2001/11/24: 45 - 21 - 18 - 07/20 - 2 *** 42 - 17 - 12 - 05/17 - 4
2002/02/04: 22 - 13 - 09 - 06/07 - 2 *** 24 - 08 - 06 - 04/09 - 1
2002/02/23: 39 - 25 - 06 - 10/20 - 2 *** 41 - 30 - 11 - 13/21 - 2
2002/03/01: 42 - 25 - 11 - 11/24 - 1 *** 42 - 17 - 10 - 06/12 - 4
2002/11/11: 40 - 20 - 09 - 09/22 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 14 - 05/17 - 1
2003/01/27: 39 - 17 - 10 - 05/17 - 5 *** 36 - 34 - 10 - 14/19 - 3
2003/03/12: 41 - 18 - 14 - 08/17 - 2 *** 43 - 17 - 13 - 06/19 - 3
2003/03/21: 49 - 29 - 12 - 12/21 - 0 *** 50 - 24 - 18 - 12/21 - 5
2004/01/14: 45 - 36 - 20 - 14/26 - 1 *** 36 - 22 - 10 - 09/19 - 5
2004/02/22: 40 - 25 - 14 - 08/24 - 3 *** 42 - 28 - 10 - 12/27 - 5
2004/03/18: 27 - 22 - 10 - 06/15 - 0 *** 39 - 28 - 12 - 09/15 - 4
2004/03/23: 37 - 26 - 08 - 12/23 - 3 *** 39 - 27 - 10 - 10/20 - 1
2004/12/23: 38 - 19 - 10 - 08/23 - 1 *** 41 - 15 - 10 - 04/16 - 4
2005/03/16: 35 - 25 - 14 - 10/21 - 2 *** 33 - 12 - 11 - 05/15 - 2
2005/04/20: 23 - 03 - 06 - 01/08 - 1 *** 29 - 15 - 11 - 06/17 - 2
2005/12/15: 38 - 13 - 09 - 05/15 - 5 *** 40 - 24 - 21 - 10/19 - 2
2006/01/06: 39 - 12 - 14 - 05/19 - 3 *** 38 - 18 - 17 - 06/15 - 6
2006/01/28: 37 - 28 - 16 - 11/24 - 2 *** 38 - 23 - 10 - 09/13 - 3
2006/04/16: **********************DNP (right knee tendinitis)
2006/12/13: 36 - 24 - 05 - 11/18 - 2 *** 41 - 19 - 12 - 06/15 - 0
2007/01/03: 45 - 24 - 13 - 11/19 - 4 *** 47 - 27 - 17 - 09/23 - 3
2007/04/13: *************************DNP (right quad)***

Games: 33

TOTALS
AVERAGES (per game)
AVERAGES (per 48 min)

Duncan:
1284 min - 692 pts - 410 reb - 268 fgm/585 fga (.458) - 84 PF
38.9 mpg - 20.96 ppg - 12.4 rpg - 8.12 fgm/17.73 fga (.458) - 2.55 PF
25.87 pt48 - 15.33 rb48 - 10.02 fgm48/21.87 fga48 - 3.14 PF48

Garnett:
1306 min - 700 pts - 386 reb - 278 fgm/623 fga (.446) - 113 PF
39.58 mpg - 21.21 ppg - 11.7 rpg - 8.42 fgm/18.88 fga (.446) - 3.42 PF
25.73 pt48 - 14.19 rb48 - 10.22 fgm48/22.90 fga48 - 4.15 PF48

CONCLUSIONS:
1. Statsoverload.com is full of . Do the math.
2. DSF is a ing moron for buying into that bull .
3. Duncan shoots better against Garnett than Garnett shoots against Duncan by more than 1%
4. Duncan scores slightly more per 48 minutes, yet...
5. Duncan takes more than one fewer shot per 48 minutes.
6. Duncan rebounds significantly more per 48 minutes.
7. Duncan has one fewer foul per 48 minutes.
8. I owned DSF harder than Duncan owns Garnett

[Brutalis]

[RogerIsEatingASandwich]

KG vs. TD, I thought this was settled a long time ago......

TD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>KG

[conqueso]

Duncan vs. Garnett career stats: Regular Season

(min) - (pts) - (reb) - (fgm)/(fga) - (PF)
***************Duncan****************Garnett********
1997/11/11: 35 - 22 - 09 - 09/13 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 04 - 06/15 - 2
1997/11/15: 41 - 15 - 17 - 05/08 - 4 *** 38 - 26 - 06 - 09/20 - 4
1998/02/14: 36 - 28 - 19 - 10/20 - 4 *** 40 - 25 - 11 - 11/22 - 4
1998/03/18: 37 - 20 - 12 - 07/14 - 3 *** 43 - 16 - 10 - 07/21 - 3
1999/02/06: 37 - 22 - 14 - 07/18 - 4 *** 32 - 19 - 16 - 08/23 - 6
1999/02/09: 42 - 08 - 11 - 02/10 - 2 *** 43 - 12 - 12 - 06/25 - 4
1999/02/22: 40 - 10 - 12 - 04/10 - 2 *** 42 - 14 - 11 - 07/19 - 4
1999/04/14: ***************************DNP (flu)*******
2000/01/04: 43 - 27 - 19 - 10/17 - 1 *** 39 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 4
2000/01/27: 37 - 20 - 14 - 08/19 - 3 *** 39 - 26 - 08 - 12/25 - 2
2000/02/27: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/03/02: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/11/02: 39 - 24 - 09 - 10/15 - 4 *** 40 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 5
2000/11/17: 44 - 22 - 14 - 11/25 - 3 *** 45 - 32 - 12 - 12/18 - 5
2001/02/16: 47 - 26 - 12 - 07/19 - 2 *** 45 - 31 - 16 - 12/24 - 5
2001/03/14: 49 - 23 - 20 - 08/14 - 3 *** 41 - 24 - 13 - 08/20 - 5
2001/11/24: 45 - 21 - 18 - 07/20 - 2 *** 42 - 17 - 12 - 05/17 - 4
2002/02/04: 22 - 13 - 09 - 06/07 - 2 *** 24 - 08 - 06 - 04/09 - 1
2002/02/23: 39 - 25 - 06 - 10/20 - 2 *** 41 - 30 - 11 - 13/21 - 2
2002/03/01: 42 - 25 - 11 - 11/24 - 1 *** 42 - 17 - 10 - 06/12 - 4
2002/11/11: 40 - 20 - 09 - 09/22 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 14 - 05/17 - 1
2003/01/27: 39 - 17 - 10 - 05/17 - 5 *** 36 - 34 - 10 - 14/19 - 3
2003/03/12: 41 - 18 - 14 - 08/17 - 2 *** 43 - 17 - 13 - 06/19 - 3
2003/03/21: 49 - 29 - 12 - 12/21 - 0 *** 50 - 24 - 18 - 12/21 - 5
2004/01/14: 45 - 36 - 20 - 14/26 - 1 *** 36 - 22 - 10 - 09/19 - 5
2004/02/22: 40 - 25 - 14 - 08/24 - 3 *** 42 - 28 - 10 - 12/27 - 5
2004/03/18: 27 - 22 - 10 - 06/15 - 0 *** 39 - 28 - 12 - 09/15 - 4
2004/03/23: 37 - 26 - 08 - 12/23 - 3 *** 39 - 27 - 10 - 10/20 - 1
2004/12/23: 38 - 19 - 10 - 08/23 - 1 *** 41 - 15 - 10 - 04/16 - 4
2005/03/16: 35 - 25 - 14 - 10/21 - 2 *** 33 - 12 - 11 - 05/15 - 2
2005/04/20: 23 - 03 - 06 - 01/08 - 1 *** 29 - 15 - 11 - 06/17 - 2
2005/12/15: 38 - 13 - 09 - 05/15 - 5 *** 40 - 24 - 21 - 10/19 - 2
2006/01/06: 39 - 12 - 14 - 05/19 - 3 *** 38 - 18 - 17 - 06/15 - 6
2006/01/28: 37 - 28 - 16 - 11/24 - 2 *** 38 - 23 - 10 - 09/13 - 3
2006/04/16: **********************DNP (right knee tendinitis)
2006/12/13: 36 - 24 - 05 - 11/18 - 2 *** 41 - 19 - 12 - 06/15 - 0
2007/01/03: 45 - 24 - 13 - 11/19 - 4 *** 47 - 27 - 17 - 09/23 - 3
2007/04/13: *************************DNP (right quad)***

Games: 33

TOTALS
AVERAGES (per game)
AVERAGES (per 48 min)

Duncan:
1284 min - 692 pts - 410 reb - 268 fgm/585 fga (.458) - 84 PF
38.9 mpg - 20.96 ppg - 12.4 rpg - 8.12 fgm/17.73 fga (.458) - 2.55 PF
25.87 pt48 - 15.33 rb48 - 10.02 fgm48/21.87 fga48 - 3.14 PF48

Garnett:
1306 min - 700 pts - 386 reb - 278 fgm/623 fga (.446) - 113 PF
39.58 mpg - 21.21 ppg - 11.7 rpg - 8.42 fgm/18.88 fga (.446) - 3.42 PF
25.73 pt48 - 14.19 rb48 - 10.22 fgm48/22.90 fga48 - 4.15 PF48

CONCLUSIONS:
1. Statsoverload.com is full of . Do the math.
2. DSF is a ing moron for buying into that bull .
3. Duncan shoots better against Garnett than Garnett shoots against Duncan by more than 1%
4. Duncan scores slightly more per 48 minutes, yet...
5. Duncan takes more than one fewer shot per 48 minutes.
6. Duncan rebounds significantly more per 48 minutes.
7. Duncan has one fewer foul per 48 minutes.
8. I owned DSF harder than Duncan owns Garnett

Looking over that again, I have absolutely NO IDEA where statsoverload.com comes up with those absurd numbers, especially for the fouls. For the 8 playoff games they've played against each other, Duncan would have to have gotten 167 fouls, or 20.9 fouls per game. Even if you also included the games that Duncan played in where KG was a DNP (there are 3, and they obviously aren't head-to-head games), that would be 15.2 fouls per game.

I'm sorry DSF...statsoverload is full of . It actually kind of offends me that they can get off printing LIES like that, but it's pretty funny that IDIOTS like you don't verify your facts before you start making ridiculous claims.

Go home. Stop propagating your deceits around here you ing prevaricator.

[dbreiden83080]

This debate is dumb. Timmy is a top 10 player of all time. KG is maybe in the top 50. Once you win 4 les guys like KG were put in your rearview mirror a long time ago.

[conqueso]

This debate is dumb. Timmy is a top 10 player of all time. KG is maybe in the top 50. Once you win 4 les guys like KG were put in your rearview mirror a long time ago.

Of course the debate is dumb. DSF is grasping at straws because he's blinded by his hatred of the Spurs. He's obviously jealous of the four rings. Unfortunately, those straws are illusory; the FACTS prove that, even if you ignore championships, Duncan has the edge. statsoverload, DSF, and all the haters. Duncan's better...live with it.

[conqueso]

2004/01/14: 45 - 36 - 20 - 14/26 - 1 *** 36 - 22 - 10 - 09/19 - 5

And btw, wasn't that KG's MVP season when Duncan dropped 36 and 20 on his re ed ass? KG.

[Switchman]

2008 Starting Four
PF: Duncan
SF: Garnett
SG: Ginobili
PG: Parker

In awe of a KG TD comination, the league grants KG the ability to wear the number 212 making NBA history.

Book it.

[td4mvp21]

Of course the debate is dumb. DSF is grasping at straws because he's blinded by his hatred of the Spurs. He's obviously jealous of the four rings. Unfortunately, those straws are illusory; the FACTS prove that, even if you ignore championships, Duncan has the edge. statsoverload, DSF, and all the haters. Duncan's better...live with it.

I think da suns fan is just mouse trying stir up .

[conqueso]

I think da suns fan is just mouse trying stir up .

If that's true, let's mark this down as the 500th time I've ed mouse in the ass, no kiss no lube

[Marcus Bryant]

The measure of the greatness of a NBA player in this day and age is whether or not he by himself is good enough to carry a team into the postseason. Garnett is not that player. He doesn't have the post game of TD and he pales in comparison defensively. He's a phenomenal offensive talent, but that is not enough.

He missed 6 games last season and his team lost 50. That's inexcusable for an alleged "great player". I recall when DRob had absolute dog for a supporting cast and his team still managed to make it to the 2nd round of the playoffs. The only time DRob missed the postseason was when he played in only 6 games, not when he only missed 6 games.

The fundamental problem is that those who can only understand the game through the aid of offensive statistics automatically assume that one player is greater than the other if his scoring average is higher.

If you replaced Garnett with TD before the start of last season that Wolves team makes the playoffs, without a doubt.

[Texas_Ranger]

[OldDirtMcGirt]

The measure of the greatness of a NBA player in this day and age is whether or not he by himself is good enough to carry a team into the postseason. Garnett is not that player. He doesn't have the post game of TD and he pales in comparison defensively. He's a phenomenal offensive talent, but that is not enough.

He missed 6 games last season and his team lost 50. That's inexcusable for an alleged "great player". I recall when DRob had absolute dog for a supporting cast and his team still managed to make it to the 2nd round of the playoffs. The only time DRob missed the postseason was when he played in only 6 games, not when he only missed 6 games.

The fundamental problem is that those who can only understand the game through the aid of offensive statistics automatically assume that one player is greater than the other if his scoring average is higher.

If you replaced Garnett with TD before the start of last season that Wolves team makes the playoffs, without a doubt.

First of all, hypotheticals are ridiculous. Personally, I don't think that Duncan would've taken the Wolves team to the playoffs. Not a slight on Duncan, I think he's the best player in the league, but it's foolish to assume that a big man can simply carry his team to the playoffs.

Garnett's points per game is hardly his defining statistics. He has the most complete game in the league, and is a world class defensive talent as well.

Kobe can carry his team to the playoffs by jacking up a ton of shots, averaging thirty, and getting his team to a seventh or eighth seed so they can get their butts whooped. That to me does not define greatness by any means.

[OldDirtMcGirt]

Duncan vs. Garnett career stats: Regular Season

(min) - (pts) - (reb) - (fgm)/(fga) - (PF)
***************Duncan****************Garnett********
1997/11/11: 35 - 22 - 09 - 09/13 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 04 - 06/15 - 2
1997/11/15: 41 - 15 - 17 - 05/08 - 4 *** 38 - 26 - 06 - 09/20 - 4
1998/02/14: 36 - 28 - 19 - 10/20 - 4 *** 40 - 25 - 11 - 11/22 - 4
1998/03/18: 37 - 20 - 12 - 07/14 - 3 *** 43 - 16 - 10 - 07/21 - 3
1999/02/06: 37 - 22 - 14 - 07/18 - 4 *** 32 - 19 - 16 - 08/23 - 6
1999/02/09: 42 - 08 - 11 - 02/10 - 2 *** 43 - 12 - 12 - 06/25 - 4
1999/02/22: 40 - 10 - 12 - 04/10 - 2 *** 42 - 14 - 11 - 07/19 - 4
1999/04/14: ***************************DNP (flu)*******
2000/01/04: 43 - 27 - 19 - 10/17 - 1 *** 39 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 4
2000/01/27: 37 - 20 - 14 - 08/19 - 3 *** 39 - 26 - 08 - 12/25 - 2
2000/02/27: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/03/02: **DNP (lower ab strain)***********************
2000/11/02: 39 - 24 - 09 - 10/15 - 4 *** 40 - 21 - 11 - 10/21 - 5
2000/11/17: 44 - 22 - 14 - 11/25 - 3 *** 45 - 32 - 12 - 12/18 - 5
2001/02/16: 47 - 26 - 12 - 07/19 - 2 *** 45 - 31 - 16 - 12/24 - 5
2001/03/14: 49 - 23 - 20 - 08/14 - 3 *** 41 - 24 - 13 - 08/20 - 5
2001/11/24: 45 - 21 - 18 - 07/20 - 2 *** 42 - 17 - 12 - 05/17 - 4
2002/02/04: 22 - 13 - 09 - 06/07 - 2 *** 24 - 08 - 06 - 04/09 - 1
2002/02/23: 39 - 25 - 06 - 10/20 - 2 *** 41 - 30 - 11 - 13/21 - 2
2002/03/01: 42 - 25 - 11 - 11/24 - 1 *** 42 - 17 - 10 - 06/12 - 4
2002/11/11: 40 - 20 - 09 - 09/22 - 4 *** 39 - 14 - 14 - 05/17 - 1
2003/01/27: 39 - 17 - 10 - 05/17 - 5 *** 36 - 34 - 10 - 14/19 - 3
2003/03/12: 41 - 18 - 14 - 08/17 - 2 *** 43 - 17 - 13 - 06/19 - 3
2003/03/21: 49 - 29 - 12 - 12/21 - 0 *** 50 - 24 - 18 - 12/21 - 5
2004/01/14: 45 - 36 - 20 - 14/26 - 1 *** 36 - 22 - 10 - 09/19 - 5
2004/02/22: 40 - 25 - 14 - 08/24 - 3 *** 42 - 28 - 10 - 12/27 - 5
2004/03/18: 27 - 22 - 10 - 06/15 - 0 *** 39 - 28 - 12 - 09/15 - 4
2004/03/23: 37 - 26 - 08 - 12/23 - 3 *** 39 - 27 - 10 - 10/20 - 1
2004/12/23: 38 - 19 - 10 - 08/23 - 1 *** 41 - 15 - 10 - 04/16 - 4
2005/03/16: 35 - 25 - 14 - 10/21 - 2 *** 33 - 12 - 11 - 05/15 - 2
2005/04/20: 23 - 03 - 06 - 01/08 - 1 *** 29 - 15 - 11 - 06/17 - 2
2005/12/15: 38 - 13 - 09 - 05/15 - 5 *** 40 - 24 - 21 - 10/19 - 2
2006/01/06: 39 - 12 - 14 - 05/19 - 3 *** 38 - 18 - 17 - 06/15 - 6
2006/01/28: 37 - 28 - 16 - 11/24 - 2 *** 38 - 23 - 10 - 09/13 - 3
2006/04/16: **********************DNP (right knee tendinitis)
2006/12/13: 36 - 24 - 05 - 11/18 - 2 *** 41 - 19 - 12 - 06/15 - 0
2007/01/03: 45 - 24 - 13 - 11/19 - 4 *** 47 - 27 - 17 - 09/23 - 3
2007/04/13: *************************DNP (right quad)***

Games: 33

TOTALS
AVERAGES (per game)
AVERAGES (per 48 min)

Duncan:
1284 min - 692 pts - 410 reb - 268 fgm/585 fga (.458) - 84 PF
38.9 mpg - 20.96 ppg - 12.4 rpg - 8.12 fgm/17.73 fga (.458) - 2.55 PF
25.87 pt48 - 15.33 rb48 - 10.02 fgm48/21.87 fga48 - 3.14 PF48

Garnett:
1306 min - 700 pts - 386 reb - 278 fgm/623 fga (.446) - 113 PF
39.58 mpg - 21.21 ppg - 11.7 rpg - 8.42 fgm/18.88 fga (.446) - 3.42 PF
25.73 pt48 - 14.19 rb48 - 10.22 fgm48/22.90 fga48 - 4.15 PF48

CONCLUSIONS:
1. Statsoverload.com is full of . Do the math.
2. DSF is a ing moron for buying into that bull .
3. Duncan shoots better against Garnett than Garnett shoots against Duncan by more than 1%
4. Duncan scores slightly more per 48 minutes, yet...
5. Duncan takes more than one fewer shot per 48 minutes.
6. Duncan rebounds significantly more per 48 minutes.
7. Duncan has one fewer foul per 48 minutes.
8. I owned DSF harder than Duncan owns Garnett

Per 48 minute statistics are completely useless. They measure imaginary things.