I believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.

[Blake]

^some say that if you allow your beloved to other men ^ you will always be angry ^ proof right here^

1. ^ angry name caller ^
2. ^ liar ^

[silverblk mystix]

^ ^ ^ ^ ^

[silverblk mystix]

^

[Mr. Blonde]

two gots in a slap fight.

[silverblk mystix]

^ did not know until now that DMC & Blake were gots ^ thanks above poster ^

[Blake]

^ ^ ^ ^ ^

3. unintelligent

[silverblk mystix]

^cuck in pain ^ flailing for attention & respect ^ a woman can strip you of dignity if you allow it ^ sad ^

[xmas1997]

If you acknowledge that it's not the word of god, why would you believe any of it.

You should be able to answer this question for yourself. Truths can be found anywhere. Just because I see contradictions in parts of something does not imply that there are no truths whatsoever contained in it. You know this, Blake. I'm surprised you asked.

What do you mean "all"?

I'm not sure why you even ask me, DMC.
Why would you ask someone you consider to be a troll?
Don't you think you'll get a troll response?
Would you believe a trolls response?
I wouldn't.

Wasn't asking you, got.

Benefit of the doubt here, though I should take the "buyer beware" stance.
Ok, I will trust THIS TIME you will be kind enough to read my reply.
"All" meaning every point of view that I can find that makes sense from my point of view, from empirical theosophical, metaphysical, philosophical, agnostic, gnostic, theistic, atheistic, scientific, personal experience, etc., and basically any cognitive experience from any source, i.e. leaving no stone unturned.
Does that answer your question?

[DMC]

You should be able to answer this question for yourself. Truths can be found anywhere. Just because I see contradictions in parts of something does not imply that there are no truths whatsoever contained in it. You know this, Blake. I'm surprised you asked.



I'm not sure why you even ask me, DMC.
Why would you ask someone you consider to be a troll?
Don't you think you'll get a troll response?
Would you believe a trolls response?
I wouldn't.



Benefit of the doubt here, though I should take the "buyer beware" stance.
Ok, I will trust THIS TIME you will be kind enough to read my reply.
"All" meaning every point of view that I can find that makes sense from my point of view, from empirical theosophical, metaphysical, philosophical, agnostic, gnostic, theistic, atheistic, scientific, personal experience, etc., and basically any cognitive experience from any source, i.e. leaving no stone unturned.
Does that answer your question?

Maybe, but could you expound a bit on "leaving no stone unturned"? What stone?

[silverblk mystix]

^troll^

[xmas1997]

Maybe, but could you expound a bit on "leaving no stone unturned"? What stone?

It's a fairly common expression.
It doesn't take much to figure that out for yourself.
Have fun with it, my complements.

[DMC]

It's a fairly common expression.
It doesn't take much to figure that out for yourself.
Have fun with it, my complements.

You mean compliments? You should get a refund on that education you spoke of.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I had to finally realize that DMC and fuzzy both considered me a troll, probably similar to what kobyz does.
It certainly does not come as a shock.

It does however make me wonder that if I am able to realize that I am capable of making a fool of myself in this manner, then why don't they have the same ability to realize how capable they are in making fools out of themselves too?

Are they living in make believe land?

I grant you that this virtual medium can be pretty far fetched and waaaaaay out there, but does this give them the false sense of security that allows them to justify their denial of reality? Maybe in a temporary sense it does. But it still looks pretty foolish in the long run, that part never changes.

So you have to wonder, do they enjoy looking foolish?
That is perplexing to me, because I hate looking that way, and most especially when it is of my own making.
No one can make a bigger fool of themselves better than he can to himself.
That should be a universal truth.
So now let's see how long it takes for the next fool to say I am a troll. It probably won't be long.

When did I say you were a troll? I didn't.

You have given up on trying to justify your beliefs. You have demonstrated no leg to stand on regarding them. You believe because you want to and for no other reason.

[silverblk mystix]

^ still thinks anyone wants to get in an insult flame war ^

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's a fairly common expression.
It doesn't take much to figure that out for yourself.
Have fun with it, my complements.

If I cannot find my wallet I am going to make sure that I own a wallet first. I am not going to make up stories about there being a wallet with a million dollars in it and start tearing up my house looking for it.

[silverblk mystix]

^lame analogy ^ no surprise ^ lamester ^

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Ignoring your baiting for a day didn't seem to get you to stop the transparent attempts so.

This message is hidden because silverblk mystix is on your ignore list.

Sweet ambrosia.

[Skull-1]

Still a religion. Scriptures written by religious men about the religion are religious scriptures. You trying to say the Bible isn't a religious text is hilarious, but it's also an indictment of theism in general. You guys individually accept it, but you distance yourselves from others who accept it as well.

I accept the scriptures. Christianity is a perversion of these where tradition and paganism replace the word of God.

[Skull-1]

That's what I gather from it. While Jesus was with them personally, they were wallowing in false gospel, but after he was hung out to dry, so to speak, they got it right because a group of people put all the books together that didn't absurdly disagree with one another and called it the word of God, and then they killed everyone who didn't toe the line.

Some fell away from the truth. They were planted in bad soil. It takes time. God did not trust them with His mysteries until they were ready. Paul went all drill instructor on their asses which helped... Paul wrote half the epistles before Peter wrote even one. Humbling experience for the rock.

[Skull-1]

^didn't take long - even after being challenged ^

[silverblk mystix]

fuzzy limpclit put me on ignore - what a pussy !

[Skull-1]

fuzzy limpclit put me on ignore - what a pussy !

Epic!


That guy is such a . Squelch him and flake. They have nothing worth reading.

[silverblk mystix]

fuzzy lard clit!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Some fell away from the truth. They were planted in bad soil. It takes time. God did not trust them with His mysteries until they were ready. Paul went all drill instructor on their asses which helped... Paul wrote half the epistles before Peter wrote even one. Humbling experience for the rock.

if blustering, puritanical, loudmouthed behavior was the basis for the word of god then you are certainly his prophet.

Seems that is your basis for thinking Paul is one as well. Why? because Constantine's commissioned work chose Paul's work which was an accident of man ordained by god. Who would have ever thought that the Roman oligarchy would choose a Roman to be the spokesperson for god? That o course was the will of god an not just very convenient for them.

That 'accident of god' versus "will of god" nonsense is exactly the orthodox semantic tap dancing to reconcile the supposed omniscience of god with mans free will. It is literally the same . It's not in the bible and straight up old school catholicism. But you claim to not follow their teachings. You even pick and choose that .

[Skull-1]

fuzzy lard clit!

Replace fuzzy with scuzzy or herpes and you have a hit! LOL