Reply With Quote
....Chuck Hayes owns KG's ass.
Holy crap! That was fantastic!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuvicmG_zgk
Wow, I only wish Tim Duncan had these kinda radical post moves like Kevin Garnett, he's the man!
garnett is a ing , I'll take any player over that piece of .
Timmy has class, he doesn't need to pound his chests all the time to be a hardass!
Heres all you need to know about KG is this:
Game 5 NBA finals, chance to clinch.....
2:31Kevin Garnett misses free throw 1 of 2 93-95
2:31Kevin Garnett misses free throw 2 of 2 93-95
2:03Kevin Garnett misses tip shot 93-97
0:30Kevin Garnett misses layup 95-99
It's not Timmy love. I'm just stating the obvious. I can't stand the Spurs but I can admit that Tim Duncan is a great player and one of the best power forwards of all time.
lol it's funny to see people discredit another player so much to make their player look superior.
i can't stan the mavs who are not even in the same class as the spurs
Hey mang, it don't have to be Spurs love to be Timmy love (but it helps).
K.G. vs. Duncan? doesn't take that much to prove really, and it's what fortifies this thread with a butt-load of win, Win, WIN!
If anything, Tim Duncan is severely underrated. This guy is is so great, with his low post moves, stoic presence, awesome leadership, and being classy. But sadly we live in a world now, where he goes unappreciated. Unfortunately, punks like Kevin Garnett and guys like LeBron get more attention for being more flashy and outspoken. Just like the sports Illustrated Issue in 1999 said after they swept the Lakers, "Substance Over Style". In a way, it's sorta like the way the Lakers and Celtics were in the 80's. The Lakers had all the flash and glitz with the fancy passing, movie stars, and fast break game. While the Celtics had more of the blue collar team game, where everyone does their part to kick the other teams ass. In a way, thats how Tim Duncan and the Spurs are, a throwback to old school team play. That is why Tim Duncan will not get the praise and recognition he deserves at least while he's playing. The age we live in is totally different, and style wins over substance. However, substance has won in 1999, 2003, 2005, and 2007. Probably like 5 years after Duncan retires, only then will the people that overlooked his game and said he was boring, will finally appreciate what he did for the game. A dying breed of big man, much like Shaquille O'Neal, that plays the positions and the game, the way it's supposed to be played.
Last edited by afireinside20; 06-21-2009 at 03:43 AM.
I don't have any hate for Tim Duncan, but in the 2005 finals Manu was clearly the mvp over Duncan.
Yea I agree Manu played great as well, but when he got hurt in Game 3, I think it hampered his chances. As for the next 2 and 3 games he wasn't as explosive, but he did bounce back in the 7th deciding game.
Like Lebron James?
stick.
Last edited by Strike; 06-21-2009 at 06:50 AM.
Well, of course, you fool! He would have only been 8 years old had he been drafted in '84! Besides, what NBA GM in his right mind would draft an 8 year old swimmer?
You're telling me Lebron James got the best record in the League by himself?
So you've backed off the statistical argument now that I shot it down?
No im still backing up the statistical argument. If the GREATEST PLAYER IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAME that averaged 50ppg 20rbpg 15apg for example had ty teammates, he wouldnt have got the best record in the NBA nor the MVP.
Yeah he would.
Shoot, people still think Kobe and T-mac deserved MVP's back when they had bad teammates.
You're ing that Tim only got all these stats, rings &because of his teammates but then you question this!!
I was givin' you the benifit of the doubt & try to understand where you were comming from but,now I'm begining to think you really don't know what you're talking bout!
OK, so where are KGs stats better than Duncans? That was your original stat argument.
KG stats were always better than Duncan til he moved to Celtics where he had to share with Allen and Pierce.....
Stat geeks should keep away from conversations about great players
Not really they're pretty important in most instances especially when your the leader of a championship team. Its just Duncans stats are better than KG's much like his resume.
If he was the greatest PF of all time, wouldnt he still have the same stats with other great players? Or maybe is he just a guy that needs others to carry him?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
