Reply With Quote
such a radical, unamerican ideology -- to repeal the reconstruction and the US War of Independence -- in favor of Lord Protector Trump
if SCOTUS decides Sec 2 of the VRA is uncons utional under the 14th and 15th Amendments and rules that birthright citizenship is uncons utional, it will have overturned pretty much the entire US Reconstruction
Cons utionally speaking, this is consistent with Trump fighting the Civil War and the US War of Independence in reverse
Last edited by Winehole23; 08-01-2025 at 05:55 PM.
such a radical, unamerican ideology -- to repeal the reconstruction and the US War of Independence -- in favor of Lord Protector Trump
Background: A Reagan-appointed federal judge (Judge Young) recently reinstated the NIH grants, ruling that the grant terminations were arbitrary and capricious, not supported by evidence and motived by racist and phobic animus. Trump made an emergency SCOTUS appeal to freeze the grants while the case is under appeal.
So, for the time being, Trump's arbitrary and capricious policy stands, while his intended victims are unjustly deprived of duly appropriated funding
Trump has the SCOTUS majority on speed dial for equitable relief, while those manifestly injured by his illegal actions must wait for justiceSupreme Court GRANTS Trump emergency appeal to freeze $783 million in NIH grants for health research
Justice delayed is justice denied
SCOTUS is standing up for the rule of Trump, not the rule of law
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...5a103_kh7p.pdf
lol Judge Young
you're an airhead, Snake Boy
Here's what this means: it's probably unlawful for POTUS to stop NIH funds from going to medical research, but POTUS can stop that medical research for a lengthy period of time while the Court of Federal Claims hears lawsuits
This, essentially, destroys the capacity for medical research in the US
SCOTUS directed judicial purge coming?
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/174-j...ttack-on-lower
SCOTUS directed judicial purge coming?
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/174-j...ttack-on-lower
Going to be wild to have Clarence Thomas and other members of the court write that even the appearance of impropriety is sufficient to allow the President to remove Federal Reserve members from office, and then head off to Harlan Crow’s yacht
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...5a264_o759.pdfOver dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan & Jackson, #SCOTUS grants a stay in the Slaughter case (allowing President Trump to remove the last Dem member of the FTC), *and* grants certiorari "before judgment" to decide whether to formally overrule its 1935 ruling in Humphrey's Executor.
Pocket rescissions approved 6-3
Apparently no one has standing to challenge Trump stealing appropriations.
Congressional appropriations are optional
or
25A269 Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (09-26-2025)
radical cons utional separation of powers going by the boards
Congress is letting Trump steal appropriations, SCOTUS is letting him break the law
the weird situation is that the district courts are the bulwark against a lawless Supreme Court
..with no help from Congress, which could stop it
Lisa Cook can keep her job as Fed Governor for now
The unitary executive ends where Roberts' IRA begins
but Black Dynamite, I live in the economy
revocation of humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans
https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...-25a326-order/
the tacit philosophy of the Supreme Court majority seems to be that the US Cons ution can be comprehensively violated and the people contemptuously trampled, so long as Trump is doing it
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-04-2025 at 03:05 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
