The Intercept does some really good work (ie what it uncovered in the MA-01 primary race) But Taibbi/Greenwald are fixing on Huntergate simply because it’s anti-Dem and they’re seeing red.
Nope. Try again.
The Intercept does some really good work (ie what it uncovered in the MA-01 primary race) But Taibbi/Greenwald are fixing on Huntergate simply because it’s anti-Dem and they’re seeing red.
so greendwald's piece didnt meet their editorial standards and he calls that censorship?![]()
Pretty much.
Everyone and their grandmother in on the conspiracy!
I already posted this story on previous page you alcoholic Mongoloid.
if you think this story vindicates Carlson’s deep state conspiracy theory about missing mail
so he actually did have them shipped by courier instead of sending electronically?
![]()
wasting 3 days of early voting by mailing these “damning do ents” across the country instead of scanning them and emailing them
Was the package opened as he claimed? Bet not.
I generally like Greenwald too, but he clearly came down several steps since Snowden stopped spoonfeeding him.
Much like Assange, I think at some point they get too full of themselves and start to think they're the story.
As if tucker ever needed proof to say .
we’re never gonna see his treasure trove of do ents either. It’s just going to fade away as a story and he won’t bring it up again. He was hoping to make a story about muh missing UPS package.
Sad to see that it has gone the way of Hillary’s missing and damning emails. Gone forever.
![]()
Response from The Intercept on Greenwald's resignation. Dayum.
"For now, it is important to make clear that our goal in editing his work was to ensure that it would be accurate and fair. While he accuses us of political bias, it was he who was attempting to recycle a political campaign's - the Trump campaign's - dubious claims and launder that as journalism"
Betsy is full of .
I am posting here the most recent draft of my article about Joe and Hunter Biden — the last one seen by Intercept editors before telling me that they refuse to publish it absent major structural changes involving the removal of all sections critical of Joe Biden, leaving only a narrow article critiquing media outlets. I will also, in a separate post, publish all communications I had with Intercept editors surrounding this article so you can see the censorship in action and, given the Intercept’s denials, decide for yourselves (this is the kind of transparency responsible journalists provide, and which the Intercept refuses to this day to provide regarding their conduct in the Reality Winner story). This draft obviously would have gone through one more round of proof-reading and editing by me — to shorten it, fix typos, etc — but it’s important for the integrity of the claims to publish the draft in unchanged form that Intercept editors last saw, and announced that they would not “edit” but completely gut as a condition to publication:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/art...biden-censored
Marcy destroying him.
You hate to see it.
So there were uncorroborated stuff in there that Glenn just chose to run with? Ok next.
Even if is just this one thing (Split just posted more inconsistencies) 1 thing is too many.
look at you try to pivot from getting destroyed on your first lie
Let's see the source emails. Like we did with Clinton and Wikileaks State Dept cables and all other reputable sources. No screenshots or pictures!
Those aren't inconsistencies Splits is posting, Marcy is a hack. The NY Post did publish emails about Biden and Ukraine.
Marcy is the one who needs to be fact checked.
Other outlets did report on Biden family's pursuit for business in China. One of his ex-business partners has done multiple interviews.
Biden campaign said no official meeting on the books but that Biden may have met off books.
Marcy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)