I was going to point this exact thing out, but decided to let it be. It has a serious case of what I call the SALT fallacy. (same as last time)
Bear in mind TSA is simply trolling. Best not to spend too much time on TSA B.S. IMO. LOL.
Fraudulent investment managers do this all the time. They look back at historical data and cherrypick events that, if weighed correctly in a model, would have accurately predicted a series of past results that are already known, then they claim to have unearthed the secret to investing while failing to tell you all they did was jerry-rig a model to make it so the model accurately "predicts" past results.
https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...-will-win-2020
He cited the fact Trump got 85% of the vote in the New Hampshire primary as a key indicator, as if the fact an in bent without any material primary opposition getting 80+% of the vote is some meaningful indicator. Do you not see the flaw in that? His model is literally always going to project an in bent wins unless the in bent faces primary compe ion which never happens.
Do you actually think Trump is going to win NY? Yes or no.
I was going to point this exact thing out, but decided to let it be. It has a serious case of what I call the SALT fallacy. (same as last time)
Bear in mind TSA is simply trolling. Best not to spend too much time on TSA B.S. IMO. LOL.
Lol TSA thinks that map is realistic.
Cult. That is all.
The model is based off how candidates perform in "early primaries (i.e. Iowa, New Hampshire) and that's it, so when an in bent wins early primaries in a landslide because he has no primary compe ion, this re 's model uses that as a key indicator said in bent will get re-elected regardless of anything else.
3 of those 6 elections were an in bent running with no primary compe ion (1996, 2004, 2012). Of the other 3 elections, he got one right because the winner of the Dem nomination performed horribly in the early primary states, which happened to be an indicator, but he got the other 2 wrong (2000 & 2008). He admits he got 2000 wrong but he's also lying about his model in the 2008 race. He predicted Shillary would "narrowly defeat" John McCain in a general election while McCain would end up in a "virtual tie" with Obama if Obama was the candidate. It was the easiest election in recent memory to predict and he has no plausible argument that he got it right but claims he did
http://primarymodel.com/2008
All he's done is find a variable that happens to align with some past election results but he's also lying about how accurate his model was for the last 6 elections. MAGA s are so ing gullible.
I'm sure they tried to do that. However, who checked on the reliability of that data?
He doesn't. If he really thought so, he would come out and say it directly.
He is, though, "sticking it to the libs", which is why he simply passed on a quote.
Disingenuous to the last.
PA bakery claims cookie sales have predicted past presidential elections — and here's how it looks for 2020
https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/p...mpression=true
"_twitter_impression=true"
You must go into withdrawal symptoms when the network goes down. (reaches for the Norcan, just in case)
Cookies look good, tbh
making a model on primaries when 1 side doesn't have a primary because he's an in bent
It really is that dumb.
Almost as dumb as this one:
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...1#post10079227
Seriously, are GOP senators trying to lose? Trump has made everyone in his party a racist dumbass
Does he think she's hispanic? Mala mala makes zero sense unless you apply some spanish into it which then would translate into "bad."
Dumb s.
He serves on the same budget committee as she does. He clearly knows her name but he got caught up in the moment and let some racism slip out
Yooooooo Will Hunting this is a little worse than the clip you posted.
This clip is way longer and really shows how badly she butchered the question. This might actually cost her.
New poll shows Jaime Harrison up by 2%
https://wpde.com/news/local/new-poll...by-210-17-2020
She just wouldn't let it go and tried to gaslight the moderator, her challenger and the viewing public that NO I WAS ASKED ABOUT CORN AND GOT IT RIGHT!
I originally paid attention to this race just because I think Joni Ernst is a and it was a winnable race, but Greenfield has actually been a phenomenal candidate so far.
She's done everything imaginable to stomp on Ernst's throat since that debate gaff
i really wish you'd stop sharing that guy's videos.
WrongdomGuy so intimidated by trump. Sad for a supposed grown man
I just watch until he starts talking
Fake news
Last edited by Spurminator; 10-18-2020 at 02:58 PM.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)