Yalls? You can just use your it can also be plural.
What draft picks are you talking about? the spurs draft picks?
The 08 spurs picks are better. Gist and Hill will be good enough to get minutes
Just curious? I actually thought last years draft picks produced more in the summer.....even though they really didnt get a chance during the year to prove anything. What yalls opinion?
Yalls? You can just use your it can also be plural.
What draft picks are you talking about? the spurs draft picks?
The 08 spurs picks are better. Gist and Hill will be good enough to get minutes
I seriously hope you're talking about the entire draft and not the Spurs draft picks.
Isnt this the Spurs area? WTF would I be talking entire NBA??
Im thinking the 07 picks may have been superior.......Im not 100% sure though. What does everyone else think?
I think the '07s just because of Splitter was better.
20/20 knowledge of the new European market, then 08 looks better now.
George Hill and Gist have the potential to be as valuable as Splitter to this team, but yeah Splitter alone would have been the best thing to come out of the draft since Parker and Manu.
Yeah, I agree. The entire NBA has been blindsided by the sudden ability of Euro teams to compete financially. The Spurs were one of the first teams to reap the rewards of drafting Euroleague guys, but unfortunately also one of the first to be hurt by it. I still maintain that Splitter was a brilliant choice. A 7' center who likes to play D. Just what they needed. The FO of the Spurs can't be blamed for failing to predict a sudden global economic change-- there are people in our government whose jobs it is to do that, and even they missed it.
Last edited by Tully365; 07-24-2008 at 02:04 PM.
Marcus Williams >>> Hill/Gist/Hairston in Summer league?
This thread insults my intelligence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)