Reply With Quote
Sorry dude but Spree and allstar?? hahahahahaah
He deserved it.
I wish Rip would have gotten in, but Manu gives me some hope for next year......
Sorry dude but Spree and allstar?? hahahahahaah
I CONGRAT MANU ES MUY BIEN
Spree needs the invite to Denver so he can rummage around the dumpsters for food so he can feed his children....
if u have time, check this out its hilarious:
http://www.thebrushback.com/defenderlaughs_full.htm
I f*king hate that punka** Sprewell
Last edited by nkdlunch; 02-09-2005 at 04:10 PM.
Look I think they missed the ball choosing Manu over Webber, bibby, brand et al...however thinking about it today...Manu's a good choice as I like him better than those afformentioned players....he may not have the stats...but he's an impact player that all players are aware of when on the court. You have to appreciate that.
it is nice that the spurs could go to bat for manu and not tp
should make tp feel good
they try to replace tp with kidd
he signs the extention and still they do not go to bat for tp for allstar game
one of which was Flip Saunders.I can't believe those ty coaches
I'm sure they don't make the decision with a stat sheet in front of them, as I don't see all the West coaches surfing the stats page from nba.com to determine who deserves to be an All star.
it's from what they see from the games, sure stats are important but they don't tell the whole story.
Manu brings leadership, high effort, intensity and does all the little things that go unnoticed to the casual fan EVERY SINGLE GAME.
Code:Latrell Sprewell Minnesota Timberwolves Position: G Height: 6-5 Weight: 195 College: Alabama '92 Player file | Team stats 2004-05 Statistics PPG 12.6 RPG 2.4 APG 2.2 SPG .70 BPG .23 FG% .416 FT% .854 3P% .342 MPG 30.6
Checkmate!Code:Emanuel Ginobili San Antonio Spurs Position: G Height: 6-6 Weight: 205 From: Argentina Player file | Team stats 2004-05 Statistics PPG 15.9 RPG 4.4 APG 4.0 SPG 1.76 BPG .39 FG% .490 FT% .807 3P% .393 MPG 29.8
Yeah that spree comment is ludicrous...an all-star in years past....but this year he's struggling...
Manu "doesn't have the stats" because he is on the Spurs, a very deep team.
He doesn't shoot as nearly as many times per game as any other all star.
Look, obviously he's on the team for a reason....his shot attempts are indicative of his importance in the O.
I don't think this statement is entirely accurate. Manu changes the game without dominating the ball. Look at Tim...if he has a game with low shot attempts, it's ridiculous to say that's indicative of his importance in the offense. That's just not something that can be judged based on shot attempts. Shaq and Steve Nash both have fewer shot attempts than in years past...to say that indicates they're less important in their respective offenses just doesn't work. Take Kobe: let's say (hypothetically, of course), that his shot attempts were down (imagine that!)...he'd still be the focal point of the entire offense. It's just not an accurate gauge.his shot attempts are indicative of his importance in the O.
Tekdragon...yes you're right...my point is this....all 5 players are just as important in initiating the O, and facilitating movement and effeciency....the shot attempts usually dictate the player that is the focus of the Offence, hence scoring...yes everyone is important...
Medvedenko is right....manu may average 15 points, but he is os a better player than the ty timberwolves PGs....
If points were your logic WOLVES009, there should be no voting, only pick up the players points per game and the one with the highest wins.
You should consider shooting yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
