I like hearing he could be the most productive big since David, but does he really have much compe ion? I wouldn't consider a group consisting of Rasho, Elson, Old Horry, Bonner, and Fab to be that. Still, if he can be a 10 and 10 guy, great. I'd rather Ian be that, since he'll be here longer, and could be the future of the team if he doesn't bust or get traded in 2010 for a star player.

Reply With Quote