Reply With Quote
24 hr loop of Obama commercial on channel 73 Dish in austin.
Can anyone say annoying?
In Texas, through September 31:
- Barack Obama had raised $10M and spent nearly $9M on ads.
- John McCain has raised over $15M and spent $1,169 on ads.
Seems a lot to waste into a state Obama has about as much chance to win as I do.
Then again, Obama has spent nearly as much in freakin' New Hampshire (where McCain has invested over $5M).
Just interesting to see where these guys are raising and spending their money.
24 hr loop of Obama commercial on channel 73 Dish in austin.
Can anyone say annoying?
Most of that 9 mil was maybe spent during the primariesIn Texas, through September 31:
- Barack Obama had raised $10M and spent nearly $9M on ads.
- John McCain has raised over $15M and spent $1,169 on ads.
Seems a lot to waste into a state Obama has about as much chance to win as I do.
Then again, Obama has spent nearly as much in freakin' New Hampshire (where McCain has invested over $5M).
Just interesting to see where these guys are raising and spending their money.
well if that doesn't show you a sign of how obamessiden is going to spend us to death then i don't know what will.
excellent thread.
bravo
he's spending his money, not yours.
you're stupid.
He's spending his campaign's money, not his. His only choices for that money is to spend it, save it for the next campaign, or send it back to the contributers, I believe.he's spending his money, not yours.
you're stupid.
so how does his tax plan work, again?he's spending his money, not yours.
you're stupid.
thats what i said.
look it up. it's easy.
How was McCain going to buy everyones home mortgages again?
Granted, he and his wife are rich enough to make this happen . . . . but, how's he going to be paying for that?
he was a jackass for saying that. i couldn't believe he said that. thanks for asking a question with a question.
So does this mean that you're anti-McCain now, since he's going to use tax payer money to buy everyone's mortagage?
Here's how stupid you are:
- You try to make a point about Obama taxing people and your very own candidate told millions of people nationwide via the Townhall Debate that he was going to use taxpayer money to buy up everyone's mortgage only to have them pay their mortgages again.
- Using your rationale about taxes, McCain is just as bad as Obama . . . yet you'll never admit to it. You'll just call McCain a jackass.
You are unbelievably stupid.
I already anticipate his answer:
It's like a robot...Liberals are stupid
show me where i support either candidate. i've said repeatedly i will not vote for obamessiden and i still don't know who's getting my vote. i'm not a sheep like a lot of people are. you show me where i give anybody my "endorsement". you're the jackass here.
stupid has no boundaries. you should try and breakthrough.
This is you posting on this board:
congratulations on the race baiting there. your "i'm a proud liberal" bumper sticker is in the mail.
just wow.Adding substance to your posts won't hurt you, you know?wow. stay classy
Give us a ing break. If you "won't vote for 'obamessiden'" and are talking about a race with two candidates ("either candidate") then it sure sounds like you know who you are giving your vote to and who you support.
Idiot, there are two main candidates, and two main candidates only.
Barr, Nader, and others don't stand a snowballs chance in .
So, if you're so adamant in NOT voting for Obama, then you're only choice is McCain. But, you've ed yourself out of even voting for McCain because he's going to tax you like Obama, using your rationale, by buying everyone's mortagages (that will be paid with taxpayer monies).
In effect, the only jackass here is you.
You're proving it with your every post.
You are incredibly stupid, and if you're really not going to vote for anyone, then you don't have any stake in this at all and you need to stop posting.
Jesus Christ, you're unbelievably stupid.
like i said i'm no sheep. you believe your way i'll believe mine. i'm not trying to conform you so why get knocked out of whack. support your shepherd. i don't post my every thought and belief on here, but you can't tell me that you are 100% for your presidential candidate. if you are, you are an idiot. you've definitely drank the koolaid. whatever color that may be. i don't care if they have an R or D in their le. i'll call out every jackass as i see them.
also, you're starting to sound like manny, peewee. i wouldn't strive for that.
Answer this question:
If you're not going to vote for Obama, as you said you wouldn't, what are your options?
1. Barr
2. Nader
3. Cynthia McKinney
McCain is not an option because he's a socialist now, wanting to buy everyone's mortgage and what not.
So, why don't you enlighten us and tell us which one of the three options is swaying you to vote their way?
to add to your post, and before i answer, that would make 2 socialists running for the democratic and republican ticket, respectively. it would have to be Barr. I wish Paul would crank it up again. He's not perfect, but his economic views are pretty sound and he's been talking about this mess we're in now for quite awhile. whoever wins better/should have Paul in their cabinet. and, no i'm not a former Paul supporter. if i may, and if i'm not out of line, i'm sure you might say that i'm voting for a 3rd party, i'm throwing away my vote, it'll lead to an obama win, blah blah blah.
if i'm speaking out of line, then my apologies. i hope this satisfies you.
Then, if you're going to vote for Bob Barr, then shut the up and post something that expresses your belief in him.
I haven't heard a single thing from your dumbass supporting Bob Barr.
Now's your chance.
WOW!!! Another know it all liberal calling someone dumbass!
Wow!!!WOW!!! Another know it all liberal calling someone dumbass!
Another convervative trying to save face now that his candidate has proposed a socialist plan to buy homes for everyone!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
