Reply With Quote
The Obama's are dirt-poor.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14805.html
You know, if you're going to paint yourself as an everyday soccer mom, you have to pay to look the part. LOL.
The Obama's are dirt-poor.
Remember, it is better to look good, than to feel good and I must say...Sarah....you look mahvelous!!
Obama's not going around trying to pretend he's not obscenely wealthy like Palin is. All politicians are wealthy. Some of them pretend otherwise.
Except that this wasn't Palin's money; it was the Republican National Committee's. Like the Edwards' $400 haircut thing - if it had been his own money, whatever; but they put it on the campaign's tab.
Well, I do like her taste in scarfs.
Well, I do like her taste in scarfs.
Did that include shoes? Because if that includes shoes, I find this number to be perfectly reasonable.
I spend 33 times this amount every day.
The girl can work it!!
and an outfit is not complete without the shoes!
and what kid would be caught dead without a Louis Vuitton bag!!
Well, Sarah....you didn't win anything but here are some great parting gifts.
well, you can't fool Joe Six Pack with a fake Louis Vitton
damn I wanna run for VP now. I'll go with either party.
Those damn liberal elitists and their $150k clothing allowances.......oh wait.
"Revelation of the Republican National Committee (RNC) spending $150,000 to clothe vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin augurs tax troubles for both. The principal tax issue is whether the clothing cons utes a deductible business expense or a personal consumption benefit. As a deductible business expense, the clothing would not affect Ms. Palin's taxable income. However, if the clothing is a nondeductible personal consumption benefit, her taxable income increases by the $150,000 spent.
Unluckily for Ms. Palin, the clothing appears to cons ute nondeductible personal consumption. Clothing is a deductible business expense only if two separate requirements are both satisfied. First, the clothing must be required at work. Second, the clothing must not be usable for ordinary wear. Thus, if clothing is usable for ordinary wear, it is not a deductible business expense, even if also required for work."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephe..._b_137057.html
You are completely missing the point. The thing is, she has an image she tries to portray of being a "soccer mom who represents the everyday woman and mom".
But Sarah is one of us! She knows personally how the middle class struggles!
I voted for Obama because I think Palin is the Anti-Christ. She has this strong power over people even though nothing that she says makes any sense. Another red flag for me is the fact that she says she a Christian. Any red flags going off for anyone else here?
I feel sorry for all of you that have already voted for the Anti-Christ. Your souls are surely doomed to for all of eternity for damning us all.
Physically, very good looking woman, excellent proportions. Unlike most American women, she's not fat.
Morally, ethically, intellectually, a ditzy sack of crap
what bugs me is that actually had the nerve to say that she and her husband have lived in the middle class like everyone else. Bull ...this needs to shove it
exactly what i said
And McCain ripped Obama repeatedly for requesting a $3,000,000 projector in Chicago for a museum that the entire public could benefit from.
Not saying we don't enjoy watching Ms. Palin run around in her little designer outfits, but the hypocrisy here is just unending from the republican campaign.
Hypocrisy doesn't even accurately define the McCain campaign anymore.
funny, I voted for McCain/Palin because I think Obama is the Anti-Christ. He has this strong power over people even though nothing that he says makes any sense. Another red flag for me is the fact that his name is Muslim, but he says he's a Christian. He made Oprah cry after his rally like she just saw Jesus and did it with with nothing but his words.(now that's power!) Any red flags going off for anyone else here?
Making Oprah cry doesn't raise red flags for me. She's emotional. What does that have to do with an anti-christ?
And everyone in the bible has middle-eastern names which have been transliterated. Even Yahshua (Hebrew), Iesous (Greek), Iesus (Latin), or the name you know him by-- Jesus. Would you criticize Obama if his middle name was Yahshua, which sounds exotic and foreign to our ears?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
