Reply With Quote
Same thing Billo and Rush did while Republicans controlled the White House.
Find another Satan.
And apparently they will be taxed more.
What will these guys do with their lives when Obama wins?
They've made a handsome living off of the Bush-hating industry.
I say, tax the living out of them.
Same thing Billo and Rush did while Republicans controlled the White House.
Find another Satan.
And apparently they will be taxed more.
Well... Olberman and Maher will keep doing their shows and Moore will keep making movies. And come April, all three of them will pay their taxes, happily and patriotically.
And BTW, Bush deserved/deserves the hatred.
I have no problem with that. The man spent like a drunken liberal and made the fed HUGE.
I think Bill O. has toned it down in the past year or two. I actually think he likes Obama.
Rush? That dudes just a big, fat, lying P.O.S.
Billo is afraid of MSNBC now. He had a whole segment about how Nielsen is somehow fixing the ratings in Olbermann and Maddow's favor. I couldn't believe it.
What will these guys do with their lives when Obama wins?
They've made a handsome living off of the Bush-hating industry.
I say, tax the living out of them.
and give the money to homeless people!
I don't see why.
Countdown followed by Maddow is some back-to-back suckage, IMHO.
Olberman always has that tiny bit of spit that goes from one lip back to the other. Disgusting. Dude should drink more water.
I actually think Chris "thrill up my leg" Mathhews is the best "journalist" on MSNBC.
David Gregory >>>> Chuck Todd >>>>>>>> Chris Matthews
Matthews is a spit machine.
Olbermann and Maddow's shows apparently have audience growth going for them. Billo still wins most of his time slots.
David Gregory is their best journalist, but he's on too early for most people to see. I still think he's the best candidate to get the "Meet the Press" gig after the election.
Chris Matthews aka "Tweety" is my favorite MSNBC analyst. He does not suffer fools lightly, and he absolutely will not stand for people who misstate historical facts. His knowledge of US political history and even world events is impressive.
If I had to align my own views with anyone on MSNBC it would be Chris. He's a conservative leaning Democrat who is quite simply appalled by the GOP. Some of the coming out of the GOP makes me fear for my country.
Olbermann and Maddow's shows apparently have audience growth going for them. Billo still wins most of his time slots.
David Gregory is their best journalist, but he's on too early for most people to see. I still think he's the best candidate to get the "Meet the Press" gig after the election.
Meh, I think Mathhews is more of a drooler. He gets a lot of saliva that pools on his lower lip -- especially after a good Obama speech.
David Gregory has really weird hair.
ew...maybe it's that I don't have HD...but I'm just not seeing all this spit you guys can't seem to stop focusing on...
David Gregory looks like Dr. Seuss's grandson
Yeah, sometimes having HD is a bad thing. For sports, it's great.
Couldn't agree more. NBC has two of the journalists I respect the most. Brian Williams and David Gregory.
true true
So does Maddow. I think her and Olbermann visit the same stylist.
He wants the federal gov. to investigate ratings fraud.
I have major issues with many things that Moore does in his films. The deceptive editing and misleading or manipulating facts are inexcusable. It is also stupid and sloppy since the things he generally do ents are damning enough without the parlor tricks. That said, he is a champion for the lower and middle class and a genuinely nice guy. I believe his commitment and passion makes him a little tunnel visioned. While this would be a huge problem for me if he were running for government office, it is less an issue for me since he's in the entertainment industry. I do wish he wasn't so incendiary with his rhetoric as I feel it undermines his legitimacy. Also, like Ralph Nader, he suffers from the stubborn idealists curse of refusing to compromise in order to take steps forward. For two men who know well that we don't live in a perfect world, they never seem to tire of hammering round pegs into square holes.
I have no issue with Maher's TV shows. He says what he really thinks and doesn't cow-tow to anyone's agenda. Very often I disagree with his point of view and I find him to be both slightly phobic and sexist, but not in any sinister way. Certainly not in any way that he would ever intentionally disrespect or limit the rights of an individual. Maher does not follow either party's company line and what he says is all his own. I also think he's funny in the over-the-top smartass way that appeals to me.
Olbermann and his ilk of rapid-fire french fry journalism can all drown in a river. I can't stand any of their types on either side of the left/right spectrum.
I suspect that all three of them will continue to laugh all the way to the bank no matter who wins any elections.
rapid fire french fry journalism?
Yes. That whole fast edit / talk loud / ranting angry white man / how's my hair look / spends more on graphics than research type of show.
They will continue to talk about Bush's diaper at least a year after he's left office. Diaper is THAT dirty.
I really dislike Michael Moore.
I'll let Italo Calvino explain:
"One component of satire is moralism, and another is mockery. I would like these two components to remain foreign to me, partly because I do not appreciate them in others. Anyone who plays the moralist thinks he is better than others, whereas anyone who goes in for mockery thinks he is smarter--or, rather, he believes that things are simpler than they appear to be to others. In any case, satire excludes an at ude of questioning and of questing."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
