Why is there a picture of your homepage at the top of the thread Dan?
![]()
Did George W. Bush Have Sex with That Man, James Guckert?
by Bob Fertik on 02/15/2005 3:34am. - revised 02/15/2005 7:00am
In 1998, Bill Clinton was impeached because of these 10 words:
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky."
In 2003, New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey was forced to resign over a secret gay affair.
So what about George Bush and this man James Guckert (a.k.a. Jeff Gannon) - a $200/hour gay male pros ute? (See Monday's expose by John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.org)
Sooner or later, Washington will have to ask: Did George W. Bush Have Sex with That Man, James Guckert?
On January 26, George W. Bush called on Guckert/Gannon at one of Bush's rare press conferences, "bypassing dozens of far more experienced reporters" according to Joe Strupp of Editor & Publisher.
I guess that depends on the meaning of "experienced."
This was not Guckert/Gannon's first time near Bush. Guckert/Gannon was at other Bush press conferences and was called on by Bush once before. Moreover, Guckert/Gannon went to the White House nearly every day for nearly 2 years. Each time he went, he got specific permission from Scott McClellan's White House Press Office. And Guckert/Gannon went to Bush's White House Christmas Party.
How did a $200/hour gay male pros ute get near George W. Bush nearly every day for 2 years?
Don't tell me the Secret Service didn't know Guckert/Gannon's background. It took amateur bloggers at DailyKos about 5 minutes to find out Gannon owned male pros ution websites, and just two weeks for Aravosis to find out he was a $200/hour . I guarantee Scott McClellan and other top White House officials knew exactly who Guckert/Gannon was. According to RawStory.com, McClellan himself has been spotted at gay bars.
So how will the American people learn the sordid truth about Bush, the White House, and Guckert?
The Lying Right-Wing Media (LRWM) won't ask the question. According to those brave News Hounds who watch FOX so we won't have to, Gannon/Guckert's name has never even been mentioned on FOX. Just imagine the wall-to-wall coverage on FOX if this had happened in the CLINTON White House!
But we'll ask it - and we'll keep asking it until we get the truth.
Did George W. Bush - and/or other top White House officials - have sexual relations with that man, James Guckert?
Lest you think this is an absurd question, I'll refer you to the widespread rumors that Bush had a long-term sexual relationship with his Ambassador to Poland ("don't forget Poland!"), former Yale classmate and Knoxville Mayor Victor Ashe. As with every other Bush scandal (AWOL, Bulgegate, Harken Energy, etc.), the Victor Ashe scandal has been blacked out by the LRWM.
![]()
I'll also refer you to widespread rumors that GOP Chairman Ken Mehlman is gay. Why has DNC chair Howard Dean been put under a microscope by the LRWM, but not RNC chair Ken Mehlman? Surely a party which used phobia to "win" the 2004 elections should explain how it could tolerate a gay chairman at the same time as it militantly opposes gay rights?
Finally, I'll refer you to the "call boys" scandal of the Reagan-Bush White House, which made the front page of the Washington Times in 1989. (Thanks Necco!)
Last week, we posted a pe ion for a Special Prosecutor for "Jeff Gannon." (So far, we've collected nearly 8,000 signatures - please sign it if you haven't yet.) Reps. Louise Slaughter and John Conyers asked Plame-gate Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to expand his investigation to include Guckert/Gannon's access to secret CIA do ents about Valerie Plame. Fitzgerald has subpoena powers, so he'd have no trouble tracking down Guckert/Gannon's clients from his pager records.
Guckert/Gannon is at the center of what may be the biggest sex/spy scandal in American history.
Sooner or later, the truth shall set America free.
Blog.democrats.com
---
Here the are right questions we should all be asking about the Gannon/Gucket affair...
How did "Gannon" gain inside access to the White House only 5 days after Talon News was established? Was that long enough to run a background check? Did he have inside help? Did an earlier background check show that it would not look good if Gannon was reporting for GOP/USA?
Finally, there are the blackmail questions that arrise for gays who are not "out of the closet". Was Guckert blackmailing someone associated with the White House? Was somebody blackmailing Guckert or using Guckert's services to blackmail someone else?
Gannon/Gucket definitely got special treatment from someone at the White House. So far, the White House had denied this, saying anybody with a similiar position could get daily passes. Refusing to acknowledge that special treatment existed just re-enforces the argument that there was some sort of blackmail involved.
Why is there a picture of your homepage at the top of the thread Dan?
Oh how those conservatives love their porn.
Blah blah blah blah. Zzzzzzzzzzz. Blah blah blah! Zzzzzzzzzzz What a bunch of ridiculous accusations and statements. All of which are supported by no facts whatsoever.
![]()
![]()
You are one twisted er, Dan.![]()
![]()
Well, I may be wrong but I thought I heard some pretty convincing facts this morning about this guys background.
I know that Joe. But some people would have you believe there are pictures of him and Bush going through the back door of the White House if you know what I mean.
Frankly, I don't see why his background is relevant.
He should have been subject to the same background checks as any other reporter with access to the White House.... whether he's a pros ute or a priest.
Unfortunately, as with the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal, the "Bush Hataz" can't see past the sex gossip.
Oh, I didn't know there was that type of connection.![]()
But I don't think there should be planted reporters and if Bill did it he was wrong for doing it too.
But I have heard that Bush is not good at press conferences and taking questions off the cuff.
Spurminator - He was turned down for Capitol Hill credentials, citing lack of a legitimate news outlet (Talon). Why did he get WH creds? Shouldn't that standard be higher?He should have been subject to the same background checks as any other reporter with access to the White House.... whether he's a pros ute or a priest.
At least when it comes time to subpoena his blue suit, Dems won't have to worry about whether it was washed or not.![]()
That's what I'm saying. It's a problem.
Turns out that Gannon may indeed have had a hard press pass after all. Here is the evidence...
In the March 3, 2003 press briefing, a woman is called on to ask a question. Behind her sits a man who looks spetacularly like Jeff Gannon, with... oh, what's that? Well, it certainly LOOKS like a laminated, permanent pass with his picture on it. There are two photos at the link provided, and I took some screencaps of my own, too (forgive the random effects - I was trying to get the pass to show up more clearly):
If this is indeed a permenant press pass, as if appears to be, this now means that the WH has lied about the Gannon situation, and that somehow Gannon passed a rigurous WH background check.
How did they lie?
They said he didn't have a hard pass (permanent credentials). The pics seem to indicate otherwise.
So does that mean they gave him one and lied about it?
It would seem to follow. THEY are the only source of permanent press passes.
And no one in the history of the world has ever made a fake do ent before!
Sincerely,
Dan rather
Dan Rather is not a elected public official, but now that you mention it, was removed from his position.
If he did fake the do ent, why is the WH not pursuing this?
I would hope access to the White House isn't as easy as forging a fake press pass.
![]()
I sent this pic to CSI: Washington and they did an "enhance" on it. Look what I found!
it's no secret bush used to do blow....
i'm used to dan's reaches, but this reach around is ri ulous.
But Bill got a blow!
dan actually posted legit this time. can't attack him for this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)