Reply With Quote
pretty cool............................for nerds.
This looks ing cool.
pretty cool............................for nerds.
It looks a little darker which is good.
LOLTyler Perry ... Starfleet Academy Chief
Sucks it got pushed back from this December.
I think the rationale behind a big summer push is that they want it to make money and gain an audience beyond Star Trek fans. If you're at all interested in Star Trek being reinvigorated and getting greenlit for more shows and movies, maybe this is the best way to do it, by having this movie make a ton of money.
Winona Ryder plays Spock's mommy. Yowza!
She's one of the few actresses that could probably make more money doing porn.
in'.
Looks like the old school Star Trek is getting a make-over, finally. Out with the corn, in with the cool.
I hope the surviving members of the old cast all get cameos.
That's awesome. I can't wait.
at first i thought this was a car commercial
As long as they bring back mini skirts...
I'm only aware of Leonard Nimoy having any role...as a "future" Spock.
I think turning the mythos of Star Trek into a slam-bam action movie is depressing, but I'm trying to keep an open mind about it. The reason the previous movies bombed is because Trek is largely about bigger sci-fi scope than just "shoot the aliens" and those kind of innerspace questions are kind of boring. Likewise the reason a few of the movies did well is because their action was built on the established foundations.
It'll be interesting to see how they manage to address the scope of the Star Trek universe in a movie format without stripping it entirely of merit. I'm not optimistic, but I'd absolutely love to be proven wrong and it bodes well that they went mostly for unknowns vs cheap star power.
I don't think the movie is going to be an extended 2-hour long action scene, I think there will be enough care to make a good story with interesting character development. I trust JJ Abrams. The creative team that was in charge for all of the Trek projects didn't have the greatest of track records. First Contact was the only TNG movie that wasn't ing horrible.
Agreed the previous Trek movies were mostly losers...but Armageddon, Alias, Lost ... I don't have the trust in Abrams you do.
I'm going to reserve judgement but Spock looked way too emotional.
Excellent points. Maybe they'll show Uhura nekkid.
Our very own Leonard does some of the animation for that movie...pm him...he has a better link of the trailer not that hand held cam crap and I'm too lazy to look
http://spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=3935
star ship troopers meets star trek jock straps...
but im such a ing fan....
and an adrenaline junkie....im sure ill love it.
but still...jock straps...
Not a Trekkie. Looks like it will be a solid sci-fi film and franchise reboot. This was just a teaser trailer. more to come.
no the first trailer was a teaser... try again.
SOMEBODY, please clarify for me.
Is this a remake, or technically is this Star Trek X? (I guess X would be 10 or 11 by now..)
If its a remake, I see trekkies hating this dirty hair-rife cat turd. If its just a new star trek movie but with the original characters, I am going to see it at the theatres. Even though it has that uber bushy eyebrowed from Heroes
its supposed to be a new start..like "the Hulk"....
It's a "pre-quel".
for reals?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
