To Galileo and Nbadan, resident tinfoilers

[DarrinS]

Fire can't bring down a building?


From http://www.fireservice.co.uk/history/crystalpalace.php

Eyewitness description of the fire that destroyed the Crystal Palace in 1936:


"Great crashes and explosions could be heard, and billowing mountains of spark filled clouds, about twice the height of the 350 foot towers, rolled away over South Kent, flaming with the glow of the fire, when we got to the Crystal Palace parade at the top of the hill, we found a seething mass of people, cars, bicycles, and pedestrians, and still more thousands streaming up from every hill and road. Fire engines trying to run out their hoses; cars and bicycles and humans rushing over the hoses, and over and above all the blinding blaze of the Crystal Palace alight almost from end to end."

The fire burned most of the night, melting the glass panels and softening the steel superstructure such that, one by one, the great supporting arches twisted and fell. By morning, nothing was left but a tangled ruin.


P.S.

[Galileo]

Fire can't bring down a building?


From http://www.fireservice.co.uk/history/crystalpalace.php

Eyewitness description of the fire that destroyed the Crystal Palace in 1936:


"Great crashes and explosions could be heard, and billowing mountains of spark filled clouds, about twice the height of the 350 foot towers, rolled away over South Kent, flaming with the glow of the fire, when we got to the Crystal Palace parade at the top of the hill, we found a seething mass of people, cars, bicycles, and pedestrians, and still more thousands streaming up from every hill and road. Fire engines trying to run out their hoses; cars and bicycles and humans rushing over the hoses, and over and above all the blinding blaze of the Crystal Palace alight almost from end to end."

The fire burned most of the night, melting the glass panels and softening the steel superstructure such that, one by one, the great supporting arches twisted and fell. By morning, nothing was left but a tangled ruin.


P.S.

eyewitness accounts are untrustworthy.

Do you have any video?

[DarrinS]

eyewitness accounts are untrustworthy.

Do you have any video?

Ask and ye shall receive.

http://newsfilm.bufvc.ac.uk/encodings/C00392.wmv

[RandomGuy]

eyewitness accounts are untrustworthy.

... from a guy who tries to use eyewitness accounts to say that they heard "bombs" in the WTC buildings, but still can't supply ANY eyewitness accounts of people who actually saw explosive devices.



Quick, I have some wrinkled shirts ready, give me some more irony...

[Galileo]

Ask and ye shall receive.

http://newsfilm.bufvc.ac.uk/encodings/C00392.wmv

That's all ya got?

The structure of the building did not collapse.

It did not look anything like a controlled demolition.

The fires were everywhere.

Building contruction in 1851 wasn't as good as in the 1980s.

[The Power Hour.]

Looks like the Bush worshiping clones are so desperate to prove fire brought down the WTC they spend all day combing the www to find any building that catches fire so they can say "you see? I was right!" Keep telling yourself that over and over so you can sleep at night not feeling like a moron when any day now proof 9/11 was really an inside job will surface, and your going to feel like Whottt after the elections.

On that day I will laugh my ass off.

[Galileo]

Looks like the Bush worshiping clones are so desperate to prove fire brought down the WTC they spend all day combing the www to find any building that catches fire so they can say "you see? I was right!" Keep telling yourself that over and over so you can sleep at night not feeling like a moron when any day now proof 9/11 was really an inside job will surface, and your going to feel like Whottt after the elections.

On that day I will laugh my ass off.

Good work, David.

[DarrinS]

Looks like the Bush worshiping clones are so desperate to prove fire brought down the WTC they spend all day combing the www to find any building that catches fire so they can say "you see? I was right!" Keep telling yourself that over and over so you can sleep at night not feeling like a moron when any day now proof 9/11 was really an inside job will surface, and your going to feel like Whottt after the elections.

On that day I will laugh my ass off.

Well, I can either believe my fellow engineers and scientists or I can believe these asswipes.

[DarrinS]

Good work, David.

You dorks are on a first-name basis?

[Galileo]

You dorks are on a first-name basis?

You've been owned!

[DarrinS]

You've been owned!

[Blake]

Looks like the Bush worshiping clones are so desperate to prove fire brought down the WTC they spend all day combing the www to find any building that catches fire so they can say "you see? I was right!" Keep telling yourself that over and over so you can sleep at night not feeling like a moron when any day now proof 9/11 was really an inside job will surface, and your going to feel like Whottt after the elections.

On that day I will laugh my ass off.

Good work, David.

LMAO @ Ace and Gary patting each other on the ass

[LnGrrrR]

LMAO @ Ace and Gary patting each other on the ass

Hahahahaha

[Nbadan]

The Bush-911 faith crowd seem desperate....

[baseline bum]

I just cannot find any way to believe an idiot like Bush could orchestrate something like this so well. Bush has been a massive failure at pretty much everything he's ever done. I don't see how his alleged most ambitious project could have ended in such a raging success with all the fingerprints cleaned away so nicely. The truther argument really boils down to "George W. Bush is a criminal genius". The criminal part may fit, but the genius side is pretty hard to swallow.

[Blake]

I don't think Bush orchestrated much of anything.

I think the criminal mastermind that was holding George's puppet strings was his mom Barbara, the quaker oats dude.

[BacktoBasics]

I just cannot find any way to believe an idiot like Bush could orchestrate something like this so well. Bush has been a massive failure at pretty much everything he's ever done. I don't see how his alleged most ambitious project could have ended in such a raging success with all the fingerprints cleaned away so nicely. The truther argument really boils down to "George W. Bush is a criminal genius". The criminal part may fit, but the genius side is pretty hard to swallow.

I'm not a 100% conspiracy advocate but I don't think it was as cut and dry as our government made 9/11 out to be. Bush is a moron. His role wouldn't have exceeded puppet status at best.

[DarrinS]

911 conspiracy dispelled by one of the most far-left America haters, Noam Chomsky:

[BacktoBasics]

That guys an idiot....

Who cares who killed JFK?

Yeah that doesn't matter

[DarrinS]

[Alex Jones]

LMAO @ Ace and Gary patting each other on the ass

Your guys are just jealous You can't pat any ass since your heads in the way.

[Nbadan]

For the 911-Bush faith crowd it is either cut or dry - either the Bush administration acted valiantly during 911 - something curiously not seen in any other crisis - or it didn't...