Reply With Quote
Due to contracting demand. Yet another troublesome figure.
WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US trade deficit narrowed to 39.9 billion dollars in December, the third consecutive month of a shrinking gap amid a sharp global economic slowdown, government data showed Wednesday.
The seasonally adjusted December US trade deficit fell 4.1 percent from November, the Commerce Department reported. It was the smallest deficit since February 2003, but higher than analysts' consensus forecast of a 35.5 billion dollar gap.
For the full-year 2008, the US trade deficit fell 3.3 percent to 677.1 billion dollars from the prior year, the second year in a row the shortfall has fallen, after a decline of 7.0 percent in 2007. The last time there was back-to-back annual decline was in 1990-1991.
The US trade balance continued a months-long trend of a sharper fall in imports than exports. Imports plunged 6.0 percent in December from November, to 133.8 billion dollars, while exports dropped 5.5 percent to 173.7 billion dollars.
Overall December trade volume shrank 5.7 percent from November.
A decline in oil imports that began in July was less sharp in December than in previous months, with a drop of 6.7 percent to 22.3 billion dollars.
The average price of a barrel of imported oil fell again, to 49.93 dollars, its lowest level since December 2005.
The trade gap with Canada, the United States's largest trading partner, continued to shrink in December, falling to 2.8 billion dollars, a low last seen in June 1999.
With China, the nation's number-two trade partner, the deficit shrank for the second consecutive month, to 19.9 billion dollars, with imports plunging 11.3 percent from November.
Due to contracting demand. Yet another troublesome figure.
Were you trying to sell this as good news RG?
to close the trade gap, invest in the USA:
http://www.industryweek.com/leadersh...invest-america“There is nothing inherently wrong with trade deficits. But they’re related to the U.S. economic restructuring that occurred in response to globalization. The real problem with that restructuring is in the distribution of the economic benefits of trade. Instead of taxing corporations that were offshoring their operations and using the proceeds to invest in American education, health, and physical infrastructure, successive governments handed the gains from trade to increasingly concentrated corporations and their increasingly wealthy shareholders.”
no, raise taxes on the oligarchy/BigCorp, close the loopholes that allow them to hide money, play tricks to avoid and evade $Ts in taxes
Also, cut the defense budget by 50%, and spend the $350B / year on INVESTING in USA infrastructure and education.
you didn't read the quoted graf
lol boutons arguing with posts he already agrees with, to insist that he agrees
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
