Reply With Quote
so what? I for one don't buyinto their crap anymore.
THey win one.
They lose one.
It will carry on for the rest of the season.
man the rockets looked really damn good on defense without t-mac. they got lazy at the end but it felt good watching a game where the other team couldn't score. we haven't had too many of those games this year...especially when t-mac has been lumbering around the court.
so what? I for one don't buyinto their crap anymore.
THey win one.
They lose one.
It will carry on for the rest of the season.
true but they have played their best ball with t-mac out of the lineup.
i hope you're right. Now if we can just snag hinrich or someone at the deadline
Dude, it was the ing Kings
The offense looked good because the ball was moving freely. First thing rox need to fix for second half, trade battier since he clearly is not the defender or shooter of the past. Next, see if Vince for Artest is still in discussions. Third, start winning on the road at the ty teams places. Rox should go hard after Raymond Felton.
You actually take the time out to write a whole paragraph with some gay le like the beloved mavs when you play the thunder so suck some rocket !
Im just saying, the original poster shouldnt act like a corner is turned or anything after beating hte Kings.
The Kings are bad offensively, every team is expected to look good defensively against them.
yea and so are we at this point!!Im just saying, the original poster shouldnt act like a corner is turned or anything after beating hte Kings.
The Kings are bad offensively, every team is expected to look good defensively against them
rofl...did you even read the le of the thread?
here it is again for your blind ass
The MAVS look good on D against the Queens too.
disclaimer: the mavs are bad @ D
We've looked better, and we've looked worse. It's a 'meh' game to me. I don't think we've necessarily "turned any corners", but getting a W after losing to the Grizz and Bucks feels good no matter what.
so what trades do you guys think will be made, if any?
and the rockets have actually played better defense this year without t-mac in the lineup....that's all my point was. do you need to about every point that is made?
We are better than playing an injured T-Mac. He can't jump, can't shoot, is scared to go to the hole but yet tries to create and be the T-Mac of old. T-Mac can help us if he gets back to playing like he did with Van Gundy. I wouldn't want to bring him back unless he's 100%. Why mess with what's working.
enough, it's time to discuss what name do you guys think will fit tmac's baby most. tmac is likely to start to practise in 36 weeks, after giving birth to his own baby. I mean, he suspects his wife has affairs so he has decided to have a son which is biologically his own.
Talk all you want, just hope dallas doesn't lose by 60 tonight.
Are you mad that Rogue just raped you?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
