Reply With Quote
Solid.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?q...0212160502AAJy
i would love to have chandler beside timmy..what do you guys think?
Solid.
question was deleted.
this
Would be nice. More attainable than Sheed without losing a worthwile SPur, even if the Hornets are in the same conf with them.
its tyson chandler for vaughn, thomas and oberto..
if that's how it will go down.
will the spurnets do it?
i hope so..between the sheed trade and this..i think the sheed trade would be better..i just want finley being traded to another team..
problem with chandler is he doesn't command the respect of the defense and could possibly congest the paint for tim. the good part of it is that tony has a target for alley-oops, amongst other things. hmmm... the paint may not be as congested as i thought.
I almost prefer this, considering Chandler is younger, stronger, and more athletic than Sheed. He is also cheaper(could be wrong, but i think that's the case AND he'd stay past tis year for sure, unless he is an FA this summer). I know Sheed is much more experienced, and WAY more of an O threat, but idk, I've always liked Tyson's abilities.
I just have 2 questions...
1) How does he look defending the Lakers bigs?
2) You think TP could pull of the lobs as easily as CP3?
I'd rather have Rasheed..he pulls big men out of the lane, allowing TD, Tony and Manu to get in the paint..
Chandler has no range at all, and his only offense is dunking..
if we're able to get him, I'd be happy as ..but if I had to pick between the 2, I'd take Sheed..
there's absolutely no way NO trades Chandler to a divisional rival like us though..
spurs'd better seize this chance, or mavs would trade stack or anyone hornets want for chandler to replace dampier who is simply a crap.I almost prefer this, considering Chandler is younger, stronger, and more athletic than Sheed. He is also cheaper(could be wrong, but i think that's the case AND he'd stay past tis year for sure, unless he is an FA this summer). I know Sheed is much more experienced, and WAY more of an O threat, but idk, I've always liked Tyson's abilities.
I just have 2 questions...
1) How does he look defending the Lakers bigs?
2) You think TP could pull of the lobs as easily as CP3?
I thoughgt Dampier was at least decent... guess not.
And to HH, I'd rather him be in the paint more than he is out of it on O, just to have another post threat.
Also, Tyson doesn't need a vast repetoire, Timmy knows more than enough. Tyson is an actual scoring threat if left alone, which'll leave more space for Tim to operate.
Dampier would be decent if he were a backup that earns 2 or 3m every year, unfortunately he is the "best" center on our team, because we haven't got another center. we have to play small ball time after time, and our small ball really did have helped us win some games, but small ball has never worked in post-season. scoring in paint is the most reliable and consistent way to gain points, but we don't have a guy that can score in paint consistently.
a division rival would never help the spurs out like that. that's crazy talk. although, chandler would be the PERFECT fit for what the spurs need.
dampier is getting paid like he's the best center in the division.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=116537
Extrarordinary cir stances exist.....
Hornets are having financial problems. Peja cannot be moved cause his contract is a piece of . So, they have to move Chandler who makes about 10 million a year. He plays solid Defense and grabs a lot of rebounds.
Even if they are losing money, they still won't trade Chandler to the Spurs.
He makes 10 mil? Damn, I'd still do it, with JV, Ime, Horry, and Fab. If the Spurs can help out the Rockets, why can't the Hornets give us a hand?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
