Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 51
  1. #1
    Veteran superbigtime's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    3,225
    Who would you rather have as Spurs 12th man? Mahinmi is now a project at best, he still has fluid on his ankle. Why are we holding on to Jacque Vaughn as if he is actually an asset?

  2. #2
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    849
    Jacque Vaughn = Veteran Leadership?

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    3,313
    Who would you rather have as Spurs 12th man? Mahinmi is now a project at best, he still has fluid on his ankle. Why are we holding on to Jacque Vaughn as if he is actually an asset?
    He is purely insurance. Also, he is normally not even the 12 man. He is normally not activated. He played a little on the road trip because Manu was out and Hill played some 2 guard. It would be stupid to release him and he would still get paid and count against salary and lux tax caps.

  4. #4
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    6,052
    Vaughn is dirt cheap and doesn't take up much space. I don't know why people are so interested in getting rid of him. He's inactive on most days anyway if TP and Hill are active so it really doesn't matter.

    Besides, don't the Spurs have another roster spot available? They can sign Pops to a 10 day if they see fit without having to release anyone. It's not a vs. situation.

  5. #5
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    He is purely insurance. Also, he is normally not even the 12 man. He is normally not activated. He played a little on the road trip because Manu was out and Hill played some 2 guard. It would be stupid to release him and he would still get paid and count against salary and lux tax caps.
    His salary would count, but I don't think he counts against our luxury tax. As a vet minimum guy I think hes exempt.

  6. #6
    fuk yo team clown tp2021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,452
    Waters sighting! Hey, have you gotten to see Gist play at all?

  7. #7
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    849
    mensa_bonsu = no_defense = no_trust = no_playing_time = bench_warmer = jacque_vaughn

  8. #8
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    20,390
    mensa_bonsu = no_defense = no_trust = no_playing_time = bench_warmer = jacque_vaughn
    Not sure we can trust your analogy on the future of one guy or his talents when you can't spell his name...It's Mensah Bonsu

  9. #9
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,451
    With the new inactive roster rules, this thread doesn't make a lot of sense.

  10. #10
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    Waters sighting! Hey, have you gotten to see Gist play at all?
    Hopefully this weekend actually.

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    849
    Not sure we can trust your analogy on the future of one guy or his talents when you can't spell his name...It's Mensah Bonsu
    Is that's the best argument you can think of (a typo)?

    The spurs will not sign a D-leaguer who doesn't play defense for the last 30-games of the season. It will be a veteran who play solid-D or simply stay pat.

  12. #12
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    1,544
    In his current state, if Jacque Vaughn tried out for the JV team at Kansas right now, he get cut.

    I said that before we signed him, as soon as we signed him, and his play over the last 2-3 years (or however long he has been steaing money from us) would not lead me to say anything different now.

  13. #13
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    vaughn is GHILLS backup ftm

  14. #14
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,451
    Vaughn is in no way a cancer.

  15. #15
    Veteran superbigtime's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    3,225
    I think insurance policy theory is BS. He's not a cancer in the way of being a jacksass or a lockerroom problem, but he does nothing for this team. Insurance for who? If TP gets injured, Spurs are ed anyway. GH is capable of playing 40 minutes and Mason or Manu could bring the ball up and play a little point. This team doesn't need Jacque Vaughn.

  16. #16
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    His salary would count, but I don't think he counts against our luxury tax. As a vet minimum guy I think hes exempt.
    Everyone on league min contracts count against the tax at the league min salary of a 2-yr vet. In Vaughn's case that's about $500k less than what he actually makes.

  17. #17
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,451
    He is very good to have as a third point guard. That's pretty much all there is to it.

  18. #18
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    I think insurance policy theory is BS. He's not a cancer in the way of being a jacksass or a lockerroom problem, but he does nothing for this team. Insurance for who? If TP gets injured, Spurs are ed anyway. GH is capable of playing 40 minutes and Mason or Manu could bring the ball up and play a little point. This team doesn't need Jacque Vaughn.
    Do they need him? Probably not. But they're committed to paying him whether he's on the team or not, so he's not going anywhere. Truth be told I think we should expect to see Vaughn back next year. Vaughn's a true professional, Pop likes him, and most importantly Vaughn's playing a crucial role in mentoring George Hill.

  19. #19
    Believe. underdawg's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,281
    Do they need him? Probably not. But they're committed to paying him whether he's on the team or not, so he's not going anywhere. Truth be told I think we should expect to see Vaughn back next year. Vaughn's a true professional, Pop likes him, and most importantly Vaughn's playing a crucial role in mentoring George Hill.
    Well said and Vaughn is not keeping the Spurs from signing Pops or any other potential pick up. If there were two players we had to add, then there should be a discussion of Jacque's relevance. If he was getting significant minutes, then yeah we would be in trouble but since he plays limited minutes and we don't need his roster spot - I don't understand the need for this thread.

  20. #20
    Veteran superbigtime's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    3,225
    I would hope Pops would be sticking around longer than 10 days. That assumption is made here.

  21. #21
    Marcus Eliot Williams Austin_Toros's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    1,193
    Not sure we can trust your analogy on the future of one guy or his talents when you can't spell his name...It's Mensah Bonsu
    Nana Papa Yaw Dwene Mensah-Bonsu


  22. #22
    Veteran superbigtime's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    3,225
    Do they need him? Probably not. But they're committed to paying him whether he's on the team or not, so he's not going anywhere. Truth be told I think we should expect to see Vaughn back next year. Vaughn's a true professional, Pop likes him, and most importantly Vaughn's playing a crucial role in mentoring George Hill.
    Spare me from "true professionals" with NO GAME.

  23. #23
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    20,390
    Nana Papa Yaw Dwene Mensah-Bonsu

    wow..lol..I stand corrected...but I do think he would be a big help for the Spurs frontcourt..nonetheless.

  24. #24
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    20,390
    Do they need him? Probably not. But they're committed to paying him whether he's on the team or not, so he's not going anywhere. Truth be told I think we should expect to see Vaughn back next year. Vaughn's a true professional, Pop likes him, and most importantly Vaughn's playing a crucial role in mentoring George Hill.
    I agree..but at that point, we might as well bring him in as a coach, as opposed to a player.

  25. #25
    Believe. underdawg's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,281
    Spare me from "true professionals" with NO GAME.
    the same could have been said about Avery, but Pop liked him and his leadership with the rest of the team. I'm not saying that Jacque has the same influence on this team as Avery did on his team when he played, but I trust Pop's judgement of leaders and players that he can trust. Let me ask you this - what do you gain by getting rid of Jacque?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •