Reply With Quote
Maybe for the short term but come play off time...If he's not in there to help man the paint, TP, Manu, and Timmy will be having a field day.
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_ar...without_bynum/
The Lakers are 12-1 since losing Andrew Bynum to a knee injury, and Nuggets coach George Karl believes we should entertain the idea that they are better without the center.
"Don't you have to make the statement that maybe they're better without Bynum?" Karl asked reporters on Thursday.
"Why do we always say Bynum? How many games has he played for this team? I like Bynum. I think he's a great player. But sometimes you can have too much talent out there and it can kind of be confusing."
Maybe for the short term but come play off time...If he's not in there to help man the paint, TP, Manu, and Timmy will be having a field day.
Bynum off the bench would be killer for the Lakers
If Bynum can stay healthy through the playoffs
Fisher
Bryant
Walton
Gasol
Bynum
With Ariza/Farmar/Odom/Vujacic coming off the bench. That's a beasty team.
I agree with Karl. The Lakers are better without Bynum. The team chemistry is far better without him because Odom isn't complaining for more PT or touches.
Just like they did last year eh?
They aren't.
Gasol and Bynum are both Centers.
Ariza is terrific
Farmar and Vujacic are overrated.
Odom has never complained about PT or touches. He complained at first about starting simply cause of the "starter" moniker. His PT has always been the same.
There's no way they're better without Bynum. The Finals last season showed pretty decisively that the team is soft inside without him.
just like odom had beastly numbers, Karl must have forgotten what kind of numbers Bynum put up prior to injury.
The lakers are too weak of a defensive team to not have Bynum.... They showed that last year and it will happen again if they face a physical team in the playoffs again... Including SA.
I don't know Diesel. They've won at Cleveland and Boston without Bynum.
I swore the Lakers beat the Spurs last year without Bynum in the playoffs.
stfu
don't give suggestions to fakers, it's a bad idea though
Put it this way, with a healthy Manu, i think the Spurs really like their chances against the Lakers without Bynum. With Bynum in there, its an entirely different animal.
Nah. The Lakers are definitely better with Bynum. Just like we're better with Oden. Unfortunately we can't seem to keep these kids on the court.
Oh, and I'm LMAO at Spurs fans that think they can beat the Lakers with or without Bynum.
The Blazers play much better with Przybilla on the floor than with Oden. Oden will be special though.
And you think the Blazers can? After the Spurs spanked the Blazers without Manu AND Duncan. The only way Portland wins anything, is if everygame is at home. That team wont be able to win a game on the road in the playoffs - so unless they get a top 4 seed, their first round fodder.
Regular season != Playoffs.
In the playoffs the game slows down quite a bit and you see more half court sets. The Lakers will absolutely need Bynum if they are to win it all. His defensive presence cannot be replicated by anyone on the team.
Actually I feel different. You are right we learned that lesson LAST YEAR, but as it stands the Celtics don't have that same big man depth they possessed last year with PJ Brown.
This Lakers team right now WITHOUT BYNUM has already beaten BOS and CLE on the road. So NO, I dont think they absolutely need Bynum. Everyone keeps saying that we do, but I feel we needed him LAST YEAR compared to this year cuz Boston isn't as good up front this year.
BYNUM just makes it that much easier if he's playin well to win a championship but I have no doubt they still can.
Last edited by MambaJuice2408; 02-27-2009 at 08:53 PM.
this thread fails.
i think he is right when talking about a lineup, but as a team no. a 4th quarter lineup of fisher, kobe, ariza odom, gasol is better than having bynum out there, but you still need bynum in between the game
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
