There is evidence that the players we've traded for in the past few years just don't thrive in Pop's system. It's not just as simple as saying this player sucks or that player sucks.
Barry's fg% has dropped an entire 9% from just last year with Seattle. That is huge. How does a player's game just drop off a cliff like that? This is a guard who shot 50% last year which is a feat most guards never achieve in their entire career. He's not starting this year and is averaging 10 less mpg. Can that alone really be the difference?
Hedo this year is shooting .15% better (still significant) with the Magic than with us last year and is averaging almost 5 ppg more with the same minutes played. Why?
Here are Charlie Ward's numbers before and after he joined us last year.
Code:
YEAR TEAM G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
03-04 NYK 35 10 23.6 .442 .428 .762 .30 2.50 2.70 4.9 1.34 .23 1.97 2.10 8.7
03-04 SAS 36 0 11.8 .346 .368 .667 .10 1.30 1.30 1.3 .47 .08 .75 .90 3.3
I'm not absolving any of these players of blame but doesn't the evidence suggest that part of the problem might lie with Pop's system/coaching and how well he integrates players with different strengths into his system?
In my view, it takes a very special type of player to thrive in Pop's system; someone who's extremely disciplined and mentally tough enough to survive Pop's wrath but who's also able to not completely bend to his will and compromise the natural strength in their game just to placate him.
Manu is a perfect case in point but it still required his enormous talent to let Pop loosen the reins. Daniels is a perfect case of Pop's dominance destroying a player. Now look at how Antonio's game is thriving in Seattle. Coincidence?