Reply With Quote
How does one have confidence in one's television?
Mine is still under warranty, so I guess it's "great."
Paging Julius Caesar...
How does one have confidence in one's television?
Mine is still under warranty, so I guess it's "great."
I have full confidence in my TV.
So if there's a military coup, a majority of Americans will be pleased, then?
Support the Troops.
I have an older TV in one of the guest rooms...........I'm terribly shaken that one day it won't work.
Once again, a duplicity in my life.
My business depends on auto companies...who are failing and I condemned the bailout.
Now, my company is being inundated with military contracts/supplierships. Its extremely lucrative and will keep our doors open (if not expand) well beyond 2012. Yet, I dont endorse our nation's foreign policy.
*sigh*
You can work on military contracts AND be against our foreign policy. I see no conflict there, unless you're a conscientious objector and you're working on weapons.
You disgust me.
What, for being honest?
Paging doctor self-righteous. Oh wait, he's already checked in. Per usual.
I thought johnny-boy was being sarcastic . . .
Medicine and maybe the scientific community are the only things I have a "great deal" of confidence in from this list...and those are a stretch
What else do people have a great deal of confidence in?
Medicine?
It's all about $$, not about health care.
Woot! Go military!
And look at the press! Guess being full of a bunch of hacks will do that to your reputation, huh?
Hey, I'm in the military and don't endorse alot of our foreign policy. It happens.
The military is ripping off America.
bull weapons systems, and over budget and dysfunctional, mismanaged materiel, no control over contractors, 700+ foreign bases, and they can't win two wars against ragheads.
You must have strong arms, to be using so broad a brush to paint with.
He's joking, gentlemen.
I don't, the colors are off in the upper left corner and the speakers fade in and out. I have little confidence in my TV.
Yeah, dont get me wrong. I dont lose sleep over it.
But I liken it to the automotive bailout for good reason. I am anti-bailout for anything or anyone, always and forever.
(disclaimer: I realize, with no equivocation, that my opinion means absolute dog on national matters. Whether we as People agree or disagree with a national financial policy means little to whether said policy will be ins uted.)
If I were a more selfish person like the other companies I work with and the individuals who run them, I would have been picketing Capitol Hill to bailout the auto industry.
I understand why they supported such an endeavor...their well-being depends on it. Theyre running a production facility on contract from companies that may go bankrupt without federal dollars. If GM/Chrylser go under, they do to.
But even the most intelligent and informed care little for the implications of a federally subsidized manufacturing an. What that means to American business and enterprise and how in the future, others in similar cir stances will come to the government teet for its suckle.
The precedent has now been set in stone that American companies, no matter how international they really are, can expect taxpayer money to subsidize their bad decisions. There are a only a couple arbitrary criteria to fulfill in order to reasonably expect such action.
Honestly, thats a strange and potentially fatal path to walk as a nation with the principles we supposedly hold dear.
I understand that there are some private sectors that *could* be nationalized and still be seen as The American Way. But the manufacturing sector isnt one of them...IMO, its the furthest from.
I mean, what is the required tenants of socialism? That the government controls the country's means of production wholesale. Well, if GM keeps taking federal dollars on the monthly basis it currently does, at some point the amount of money owed to the Fed is going to be more than the company is worth (especially if their foreign vehicle markets/brands keep drying up at the rate they are).
At that point, we will see the largest automotive company in the country wholly owned by the government. It will get to a point (soon, IMO) that the government will just rest control from private enterprise, condense the two ailing companies and then be in direct compe ion with Ford! (Ford has not taken one dollar from taxpayers....yet)
Think about that! Where does that leave Ford? Will the government have to subsidize Ford like they do farmers? Because no private enterprise can realisitically be expected to compete with the United States Government, nor should they.
Like I said, its a weird time to be in the business.
You mean Ford would have to compete with the Federal Government?
The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT?
I think Ford will do just fine; it'll take about 5 years, and Uncle Sam will be producing Trabants from old Soviet design schematics...trying to sell 'em for 60 grand!
Clearly you're ignorant of the requirements justification process for government services and materiel contracts. It involves an insane amount of red tape, including various levels of approval authority based on dollar thresholds.
I can guarantee you that more money is spent in man-hours to justify these contracts than is actually spent on the contracts themselves.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
