Reply With Quote
your right, Pop's will trade him for Greg Ostertag.
And watch GH take over starting PG for another team.
...because nearly everyone here thinks he's the next coming of jesus christ himself and should be annoited critical playoff minutes when he hasn't earned them...
...if we trade him now (according to y'all he has unlimited derrick rose-like potential) we could get something in return.
your right, Pop's will trade him for Greg Ostertag.
And watch GH take over starting PG for another team.
You're an idiot. Hey, just to play it out right, let's trade him to Dallas for a draft pick, then we can watch him punk Tony defensively for the next couple of years.
and then have a good first year and get a big contract with said other team and then end up being what they are...a bad backup point guard starting for a horrible team stealing money...yes beno udrith is a good example
Udoka/Bonner/vaugh are stealing money too then!and then have a good first year and get a big contract with said other team and then end up being what they are...a bad backup point guard starting for a horrible team stealing money...yes beno udrith is a good example
Therefore we have it bad
i may be an idiot but you're an aggie fan
starting this thread was tongue in cheek, partially, george hill IS NOT derrick rose as i read somewhere else on here. many people want to give him playing minutes "just to give a chance".
dude had his chance during the season. i like his athleticism and think he can evolve into a solid jaque vaughn-like back up point gaurd, but dude will neve live up to the potential many on here are giving him.
I remember people here saying he was better than Rose 30 games into the season.
sigh, another victim to Pop's Hypnosis
Yes, and he performed admirably for much of it. Cutting him out of the equation entirely was the wrong move. Hill doesn't have to be Jesus for that to be true.
George Hill and Jacque Vaughn's style of play are like on opposite sides of the basketball spectrum, but thanks for playing.
and this is where I stop reading your takes.
^ lmao
and this is where I stop reading your takes.
I think the extent of what people are saying is that he would be a good matchup against barea, allowing tony some much needed rest. He's also the best option we have at backup pg. Mason is awful. There's no reason to at least try it.
bingo was his name-o
, for most of the season whene he had his chance, he was doing a great job.
Let me guess, you were pumped seeing Tony completely gassed at the beginning of the fourth and getting punked by JJ freakin' Barea...
I'm sorry that matchups and giving Tony a breather are lost on you, but then you'd rather make a stupid comment about me being an Aggie fan than talk any hoops. Fair enough.
And I'm sorry, I have a hard time believing this thing is tongue in cheek. You're running around in multiple Hill threads bashing the guy and defending Pop. Anyone who thinks he is going to pull a Derrick Rose right now is a fool, but so is anyone who thinks he couldn't give us some burn at the point instead of having to watch Parker get slapped by the backup point for the Mavs.
He just needs time to develop then POP will start giving him more minutes when he impresses POP. Just like Tony Parker when he didnt get much minutes as a rookie. Give him a chance.
What stupid thread. No one thinks he's Derrick Rose. People think he's better than having NO backup point guard, which is the current state. Do you watch games? Do you see how painful it is to even get the ball up the court when Tony is out? No one is saying Hill is awesome. They are saying he's better than nothing.
He impressed Pop early in the season. But then he ed up in a game after the All-Star break, and he's a rookie so now he's at the end of the bench while Pop stands there with his head in a hole in the ground pretending that Mason is a freakin' PG.
If Pop applied the same standards to Bonehead and Finley that he applied to Hill, neither would be in the rotation right now.
And that's crap. But don't worry. We'll get beat, they'll blame it on Manu being out and do jack this off-season, then wonder why 86 year old Michael Finley can't hang at PF next year...
(oh, and also Gooden will be a scapegoat, you can count on that. not that he is, but it'll be standard front office off-season fodder)
Last edited by Aggie Hoopsfan; 04-19-2009 at 03:35 PM.
Is this the kind of stupid they teach you at UTSA?
Hill has earned those minutes all season.
All we're missing is Tpark/Eric showing up to defend the great Pop and this thread will be complete
+1
I don't understand the repeated attempts to put Mason in at backup point guard when they have a point guard on the freaking bench!!! I fail to remember one time all season when Mason delivered at the point. I'm not trashing Roger, he's doing what his coach is telling him to do.
I'm so tired of Pop's anti-rookie at ude. Just because he's a first year player doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a shot in the playoffs. See what he does. If he fails, sit him. But don't just assume he's going to fail just because he's a rookie.
exactly. anyone saying he 'didnt earn' any minutes is a moron...so has bonner 'earned' all his tons of minutes??
You're talking about the same coach who has insisted on the past in playing Michael Finley at "power forward" when he had bigs on the bench...
not a bad idea barring that popovich doesn't use him. if he is simply waiting for him to gain some seniority, then he should stay, but he's wasting roster space if coach has no intentions of using him. i'm neutral on this one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
