Reply With Quote
There's a Game Blog thread.
Thanks.
are shown without Duncan.
Pop can't coach .
There's a Game Blog thread.
Thanks.
Sequ, post some of substance for once.
The game blog is where you put random thoughts. If you want to start this thread, post something of substance.
What specifically did Pop do wrong tonight? What would you have done different?
If you want to just post random crap, do it in the Blog. If you want to post something real that promotes discussion.. here's your frickin' thread.
Someone agrees with me for once, and the irony behind it is that the person is Sequ.
you should develop what you started last time,
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12354
pop = tool
WEll, luckily TIM DUNCAN IS ON THE TEAM. So we don't have to worry about that.
Can you read?pop = tool
The game blog is for your random thoughts. This thread is for Sequ's and anybody else with their in depth analysis of what Pop did wrong tonight.
Without Duncan the spurs are a lottery team.
A team full of role players with no one other than duncan who can be a consistent 20 point scorer. The spurs weaknesses are exposed without Duncan. They just don't have any big time players capable of being go to 20+ point scorers who can step it up without Duncan.
Shoot.
Then I don't belong here. I'm a Pop supporter.
I didn't watch the game, so, can someone please explain why we got blown out by an eastern conference team that isn't going to make the play-offs?
Random?
Its not random that Pop has no clue about adjustments or.......
If you will.......
He doesn't have the tools.
Which he recruited and signed.
Dude has had the most money for the past five years in the NBA and has Rasho, Barry, Nazr and Beno to show for it.
I would've resigned Claxton, offering him a chance to compete for the starting position. (But after the contract is signed, bring him off the bench)
I would've locked up Jackson for 5+ years.
I would've signed any other center not named Rasho or that dude from Minnesota.
As far as coaching, get the tools, and then coach.
Without Duncan, this dude is nothing.
Would've been nice had any guard besieds Devin scored at all. I suppose I would've brought Glover in sooner.
If that is not a perfect le I don't know what is.
Agree
The lottery prize Duncan who anyone on this board could have gotten has bailed out Pop. The players he has surrounded duncan with are no better than a lottery team talentwise.
I am really concerned that this team cannot finish games. They look dumbfounded out there when Rasho or Barry are in the game. They got bentover tonight and spanked dry.
Who is to blame? Parker? Barry? Ginobili? Malik?
How about POP.
I am very upset about this collapse in the second half and the lack of anyone on this team to step up to the plate and win the damn game.
Last year, when Duncan went out, the players stepped up, this year, I don't think anyone knows their role.
I agree with Sequ on the Spurs' lack of FINISHING WHAT THEY STARTED!!!
The Spurs normally come out on fire, under control, owning in the 1st quarters with a lot of energy...but they don't have a killer instinct to finish the game, and keep the lead up. Once they have a big lead, they don't maintain it.
Someone, when we are winning by 20, a scrubby team comes back and wins. I don't know why, but the Spurs can't finish games. They only try in the 1st quarter.
back to back game...
TP and Manu just back after injuries...
the need to adjust off & def scheme w/o TD
etc etc etc
So rascal back after 18 day hiatus right after Duncan's out and Spurs lose. The players are better than any lottery team out there. Keep in mind it would have to be a run and gun style.
I don't care about back to backs, with or without Duncan, blah blah blah..........
I don't expect this team or any other team without Duncan or Shaq to win a championship.
What I am saying is after 60 games and a preseason, Barry, Rasho, Beno, Ginobili and Parker are on different pages.
WTF?
A coaching problem.
i dont get it K, just dont get it
who would you hire to replace pop?
lol you're a joke.
enjoy your thread
The spurs without Duncan just aren't very good. They would be a lottery team with one of the worst records without duncan.
Thats the reason. They are a bunch of role players and without their one true superstar they don't have anyone whi can be a consistent go to scorer. Parker and Manu are good but they are not consistent go to players that can win without Duncan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
