We're worse.
Without Tim, we're this years Lakers.
God!
So is any team missing their best player...and decimated with other various injuries.
Maybe, at home we'll play better.
Shaq's never coming back, though.![]()
We are way worse than the Lakers without Duncan, and you don't know how much I dislike this comment..but it's true.
give spurs time to adjust
spurs just do not have duncan'
they do not have a healthy manu (the spurs second allstar)
Look at the minutes Tony and Manu didn't play nearly the minutes they should have, why? Because they're playing after being injured and that takes time to adjust.
agree they play over 36 minutes SPURS WIN
If Ginobili was close to being fully healthy, the Spurs are much closer to winning these games and probably pull off at least two of them.
except maybe the Pacers although their 2nd best player isnt out with injuries per se . . .
No we are not worse than the Fakers without Timmy.
We are a TEAM with diverse injuries other than Timmy being out.
I think in a 7 game series, the Lakers would defeat us if we didn't have Tim.
Bowen does a fantastic job on Kobe generally, but a lot of that is due to having Timmy and Rasho back there to help. The Spurs suck against Odom as it is, without Timmy just takes away another option. I actually don't think the Lakers supporting cast is that bad, Odom, Mihm, Atkins, Butler, Jones, Grant etc are all solid players, Kobe is a big part of the problem with the way he plays. If LA had LeBron, they'd be better.
Actually, the lakers have Odom out....Mihm has back problems and Sucky Crapkings can't gaurd his own lunch, and kobe has been inujred the entire season. However, in a 7 game series it would be fun..but I still give the nod to the spurs....more experience and better coaching.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)