Government Decides Not to Appeal Further in LtCol Chessani Case; Decision to Re-Charge Still Pending
http://www.thomasmore.org/qry/page.taf?id=63
ANN ARBOR, MI – A government official has informed the Thomas More Law Center that the government will not seek to appeal the recent unanimous decision by the Navy Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (NMCCA) in favor of LtCol Jeffrey Chessani, USMC.
The decision makes permanent the ruling by the trial court judge, Colonel Steven A. Folsom, USMC, dismissing the charges against LtCol Chessani – without prejudice – due to Unlawful Command Influence. The government could have sought an appeal to the civilian Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces (CAAF), and then to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Because Col Folsom’s dismissal of charges was made without prejudice, the government could still seek to re-charge LtCol Chessani.
The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, along with detailed military attorneys LtCol Jon Shelburne, USMC, and Capt Jeffrey King, USMC, have represented LtCol Chessani throughout the criminal process.
In order for the government to start the process of recharging LtCol Chessani, the Commandant – General James Conway, USMC – would have to appoint a new convening authority (the rank of General) that was not precluded by Col Folsom’s ruling, which was based on Unlawful Command Influence.
Col Folsom precluded the commands of the I Marine Expeditionary Force (I MEF), Marine Forces Central Command (MARCENT), and General James Mattis, USMC in particular. Whoever is named the new convening authority (the new General) would have to make an independent decision on whether or not to bring new charges against LtCol Chessani. If the General did desire to bring charges, LtCol Chessani would be subject to a new Article 32 Hearing.
On March 17, 2009, the 3-judge panel of NMCCA unanimously vindicated the ruling by Colonel Steven A. Folsom, USMC, dismissing all charges against LtCol Chessani on the grounds of Unlawful Command Influence. LtCol Chessani is the senior-most officer criminally charged as a result of the much-publicized and ill-described “Haditha massacre.”
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “LtCol Chessani devoted over 20 years of his life to his country and the Corps he loved. His reward: criminal prosecution and ridicule by the mainstream media. Sadly, insurgents, with the complicity of the media, were able to remove one of our most effective combat commanders in Iraq by unfounded allegations of a ‘massacre.’ The immeasurable damage to America by the prosecution of this loyal and patriotic marine officer can never be rectified. Nevertheless the decision not to engage in any further appeals is welcome news. We hope that the Commandant will now say ‘enough is enough’ and allow LtCol Chessani, his wife, and six children get on with their lives.”
The Thomas More Law Center defends and promotes America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanc y of human life. It supports a strong national defense and an independent and sovereign United States of America. The Law Center accomplishes its mission through litigation, education, and related activities. It does not charge for its services. The Law Center is supported by contributions from individuals, corporations and foundations, and is recognized by the IRS as a section 501(c)(3) organization. You may reach the Thomas More Law Center at (734) 827-2001 or visit our website at
Yep, Murtha's not only a lying bag of , but a corrupt man.
I thought this thread would be about his brother, Robert Murtha, getting rich from all those involvements coming out of his Murtha's committee...
And now, his nephew getting no bid contracts...
no bid contracts lol
Are conservatives against no bid contracts now?
No comments about Chessani's vindication?
you want them to re-hash it?
Why do you hate the US Army?
Show me a no-bid contract in Iraq that wasn't needed. You may not agree with the reasoning, but there were reasons given that can be supported.
Was Murtha's family the only ones capable of doing the jobs given to them?
Not really vindicated at this point.
Yes, some -with-ears can re-charge him. Isn't that lovely?
Chessani is probably on Napolitano's terrorist watch list.
there's only one way to find the truth.
waterboard.
you should put some cream on that.
If he's not guilty, he has nothing to worry about. Why is this particular case so important to you?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...050403283.htmlKBR, the Army's largest contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan, is linked to "the vast majority" of suspected combat-zone fraud cases that have been referred to investigators, as well as a majority of the $13 billion in "questioned" or "unsupported" costs, the Pentagon's top auditor said yesterday.
WH, that doesn't answer my question. Besides, that was not a no bid contract was it?
Did you all forget that Halliburton/KBR already had the bided contracts for supplying the military?
One no bid contract, because Halliburton built a complex, had the blueprints and spare parts, does not qualify.
This is about Murtha. What reason does his family get special contract rights for? Stop sidestepping the issue.
Even if the truth is as you imply, two wrongs don't make a right!
I don't defend Murtha. His use of earmarks is shameless, and his association with PMA is so shady other libs starting giving their contributions back. But your mindless apology for war grifters is just, well, mindless.
Why do you hate the US military?
I rather like them. I'm certainly not ting on them for choosing the company they did in this case the way Wild Cobra just did.
It appears you should read the article for which you provided a link. The Army gave its reasons therein.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
