It's funny how all the Spurs had to do was put more of a burden on Brent Barry's shoulders to get him to step up and play the way he's capable of. It's even funnier how some "fans" blamed his slump on being a choker, only being able to play well on sub .500 teams, not winning a NCAA Championship and any other number of random jabs at his heart or manhood.
Brent Barry standing in the corner waiting for the occasional kick out and then running himself ragged trying to keep up with a defensive system designed around the best defenders in the league equals bad.
Brent Barry getting touches, running the break and pushing the ball, setting up teammates, slashing to the basket, handling the ball, getting more minutes, getting more consistent minutes and taking shots in the flow of the offense instead of spot up threes with the shot clock running down because he was the last option equals good.
It's that simple. Period. When he's involved in the offense the Spurs are better and Brent Barry is better. When he's on the outside looking in waiting behind the three point line for the possibility Duncan will dump it back out and he might have to jack up a long range shot because the shot clock is running out he's just a waste of space out on the floor. If that's the only role you want out of a player then you're better off with Devin or Beno in there, because both are better at it. But if you really want the offense to open up, put Bones in there and have the Spurs move. Perimeter passing, moving without the basketball, slashing into the paint, drawing double teams and kicking it out, rotating to find the open man and Fast Breaks. And you can still do all that with Duncan inside if you actually draw up a few plays that way. Just don't expect him to perform if you're trying to shoehorn him into a position he's never really had to deal with before and that limits his effectivness and plays away from his strengths. Makes sense to me...