Reply With Quote
This is why Newt needs to run for president, strictly for the ownage he would accomplish on the debate stage. Baggage be damned.
"Obama will soon realize you cannot just name something to solve the problem"
"More bureaucracy, nothing new here."
...government is that President Obama is putting people in charge of vast segments of our executive without any Congressional advice or consent.
Take, for instance, his "Science Czar," Paul Holdren:
A book he co-authored in 1977 advocates forced abortion and mass sterilization as means to control planet population and save the world.
Some blogger at "zombietime.com" has done the work the mainstream media, once again, refuses to do. At the link are scans from the book.
I know, I know; some of you are going to claim the excerpts are all faked up for the allegation but, a used book dealer search for the ISBN shown on the back cover does indeed turn up a book that appears substantially identical to the one Zombie claims to have taken the scans from.
Click here for: ABE ISBN book search.
Click here for: Alibris ISBN book search.
I can see where Justice Ginsburg got the idea.
So, unless there is a conspiracy here "so vast" that it includes planting forged copies of a fake book with used book dealers around the planet, and altering the ISBN database accordingly, then its pretty clear that the book in question does exist. Galileo and 9/11 truthers will probably believe in this "vast conspiracy" of book dealers though, since you know...in the history of the world, fire has never melted steel.
Precisely how many of the President's appointments, requiring Senate confirmation, are still pending? Why does he need all these "czars?"
This is why Newt needs to run for president, strictly for the ownage he would accomplish on the debate stage. Baggage be damned.
"Obama will soon realize you cannot just name something to solve the problem"
"More bureaucracy, nothing new here."
That seems to be a recurring theme.A book he co-authored in 1977 advocates forced abortion and mass sterilization as means to control planet population and save the world.
So which of these policies is being enacted right now?
Socialism
There's an article about him on prisonplanet.com too if you want to know the company you now keep.
At one point or another, all news sources will at one point will have been used to prop prison planet's agenda, so i dont't see the use of any source from that source as a case in point of credibility.
If a poster's agenda is pretty much identical to that of prisonplanet, it is noteworthy.
like when you said you didnt like ron paul because "nutjobs" and racists supported him
true, but we've have all entertained thoughts at one point that have been alex jones's.
What the guy stated is true, damn the source.
More like I like some of what Ron Paul says, but he doesn't have a chance in of being elected president because so many nutjobs and racists support him.
who wouldve thought racists would support the bill of rights
period.
So again, I will ask -- what does that actually mean now, 30 years later? Which of these policies are actually in the works?
rather, question mark?
They might or might not -- the two can be mutually exclusive.
I'm sorry I was right about Paul. Perhaps he should have worked harder to do things like take his name off the newsletter he says he has nothing to do with, etc.
it's only been six months, i guess some can afford to wait and see, but i'm pretty sure there will be some spin on how to defend any of the oncoming agenda.
and that's what probably did him in, if he would have gone a step further like Obama did with Rev Wright, he might have reached more people.
Can you?
I'm not sure how sincere this was, but it's actually very true.
Hey, did he co-author a book advocating forced abortion and mass sterilization or not?
Hey, is that the now official policy or not?
Hey, did he co-author a book advocating forced abortion and mass sterilization or not?the first question involves a Yes or No answer period. chump avoiding the question.Hey, is that the now official policy or not?
what diff if it's the policy now or not? The point is Did he co-author the book or not, Yes or No?
Looks like yes. I believe it.
It doesn't matter to you if a eugenics policy is enacted?
Yes or no?
i'm sure you didn't actually want an answer to this question, but....
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/15/...inees-delayed/As of May 31, only 151 of the 1,100-plus Senate-confirmable positions had in fact been confirmed by the Senate.
I'll try to find something more recent -- or maybe you should since you are so curious about it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
