Braveheart, Stephen kinda made the movie.
In honor of their BluRay release on the 1st, I was curious which one people preferred.
While I've always loved Braveheart, the more people I talk to, the more I get the impression that, at some point, Gladiator leapfrogged it in terms of sheer epic awesomeness in most people's eyes.
v.
![]()
Last edited by Fpoonsie; 08-26-2009 at 11:01 AM.
Braveheart, Stephen kinda made the movie.
This is a tough one.
I give the nod to Gladiator because of the superior sword fighting. I've always loved ancient greek/roman history so I am very biased though.
braveheart, hands down
Easily Braveheart, and its not even close IMHO.
This is tough call for me.
But I'll have to go with Braveheart.
And William Wallace gets some.
That is a correct statement.![]()
Freeeeedom!!!!
Braveheart definitely. I don't care for Russel Crowe.
I think I'm a tad TOO ST-reTAHded to figure out that poll nonsense, so I'll just have to keep a running tally in my head.
To my surprise, Braveheart's pullin away so far.![]()
Braveheart by a WIDE margin. One of the greatest movies of all-time, IMO.
Braveheart film score >>>> Gladiator film score.
Braveheart was the better movie, but for sheer ass kickery, Gladiator was it.
Tie
Gladiator.
Braveheart, while entertaining was full of historical inaccuracies and Mel Gibson's accent was terrible.
Can't say either/or. I'm a fan of both movies. As a history buff, I dig both. Although historical accuracy tends to take a backseat in both movies, Gladiator is essentially a fictional story tied in to a historical period. Either way, I love both movies. Couldn't pick one as the better.
You don't really think that Emporer Commodus was killed in the Colosseum by an ex-legionairre general turned slave turned gladiator, do you?
Even better was when the son tried to stab the King and ends up gettine slapped and completely owned.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)