Reply With Quote
Charlie is right. You don't want light rail. Learn from your neighbors up I-35.
Listening to this schmuck this morning on the way to work while he was talking about possibility of a light rail being constructed in san antonio at the cost of .008 increased sales tax.
Dumb Charlie kept on insulting the idea saying that San Antonio doesnt need it and that the people wouldnt want it. Now if this guy actually had a basis as to why he didnt like it other then not liking it, I would not have a problem, but his dumbass arrogant at ude drug him over the edge.
Of the three on the show The cohosts were more then interested and so butt pain charlie went on to make a poll on his page, overly confident in his stupidity even to go as far to place a bet that if the yes percentage would break 25% he would buy his two cohost lunch...well dill hole charlie the vote stands at 49.44 Yes 50.54 no. IDIOT. Just cause your an old duche bag doesnt mean the rest of the city is.
So as to why I am a yes man? San Antonio is the only top ten pop city in the country not to have one. I lived in the DC metro for a ten months....light rail there was out standing. Go out on the weekends take rail so even if I did have to much to drank I was safe riding the rail. The areas where the train serves will become more valuable aswell as rejuvenated. Oh not to mention even Detroit has one....
On another note aggravated cyst charlie had an incident years ago when the saints played in town where he was bragging on the radio about being so drunk he forgot the game and his wife had to pick him up(god bless her soul). Late an angry listener called in to ask about it and he denied the entire episode then went on to insult the listener... i dont like charlie parker infact I have sirius and would much rather listen to stern BUT IF there were a decent morning show covering news in SA I wouldnt change the dial from woai...good day
Charlie is right. You don't want light rail. Learn from your neighbors up I-35.
Light rail is expensive. It is highly subsidized where I live not only with a 1% business tax, but property taxes also. It costs $86 for a monthly pass. A single ride fee is $2.30, but about 2/3rds of the real cost is subsidized by tax payers.
If your politicians are like ours, the final costs will be 2 to 5 times higher than they say to get approval.
Here in Austin our light rail is about $20 million over budget, the taxpayers are on the hook for another $30 million because CapMetro didn't get the federal matching funds they told the voters they would get. The project is over a year behind schedule and the ridership projections keep gettting cut. Basically we're going to end up spending $100 million for a light rail system that will serve about 1,000 commuters a day.
We can either build light-rail or build more toll roads...and with $5.00/gallon gas possible and the continued population growth of SA, I lean toward Light rail...
BTW...Charlie Parker is an asshole but I swear he reads this forum...
Another poster mentioned the DC metro system and how great it is...he is right...it is a great system...
Unfortunately the system being proposed in SA is nothing like that...it is a SURFACE RAIL system...meaning every single city street between the Dominion and downtown will be closed *ding*ding*ding*crossbar dropping*ding*ding*ding* while the train comes through and thousands of cars will sit idling at the crossings while the lucky few that benefit from our tax dollars sip their lattes and read their wall street journals.
austin has about one of the most poorly planned traffic infrastructures in the entire country.
All I know is that light rail's been great in SLC. Absolutely a success from just about every angle. The amount of economic development that's sprung up around that thing is unbelievable. It is routinely packed. Its efficient, clean, quiet and usuable. It transformed the city in about 10 years.
I'm not going to pretend to know the ins and outs of the San Antonio deal, but if the best somebody's got is that they don't want to wait at rail xing's while sitting in their F-350 and listening to Rush, than they're probably not thinking about the situation even a sixth as judiciously as they should.
Uhhh...before I respond with a " you asshole" for your arrogance I will try to give you a more detailed response that maybe even you can understand.
What purpose is a rail system supposed to serve? can we agree on...
#1) provide clean, easy, affordable transportation for the general population
#2) save energy
A dedicated metro system does that...It has it's own dedicated underground or elevated lines and does not interfere with other transit systems/methods...multiple spokes feed a multiple station central metro hub. It is easy to navigate and convenient to use.
What does OUR proposed system do? It uses the existing Union Pacific railroad tracks and goes from the old abandoned grain silos you see on the near west side of down town out to the gravel pits by the Dominion...meanwhile crossing and stopping traffic on every single east/west street causing thousands of cars, trucks, and busses to sit there idling and wasting fuel...
You know those gravel trains you get stopped by rolling *clunkety clunk*clunkety clunk* clunkety clunk* as you sit there in your car or your bus (because you don't live in the Dominion and work in an office downtown and you need to get from YOUR house to work) wondering if they will EVER get the out of the way?
Do you live in the Dominion? do you really want to pay taxes so they can ride the train to downtown instead of taking the Mercedes?
lol, Salt Lake's then proposed light rail line used existing UP tracks from the ty west side of town, out to the suburbs. Before, it was a vacant warehouse and hobo village. Today it's part of a major shopping center.
Like I said, I don't know what exactly is being proposed in San Antonio, but light rail systems move with traffic, they stop at red lights and they yield to cars when applicable. I rarely ever wait for trains any more than I would normally for red lights and the flow of traffic. Besides, light rail trains are small, 2-6 cars. They pose no problem whatsoever.meanwhile crossing and stopping traffic on every single east/west street causing thousands of cars, trucks, and busses to sit there idling and wasting fuel...
A picture to illustrate, unsurprisingly you can see development/construction as well:
The people in the picture above are all dyed in the wool, red as blood, mormon and republican; heading home to the suburbs after a long day of work. Yes, I want to pay my incremental taxes so they can take the train instead of driving downtown.do you really want to pay taxes so they can ride the train to downtown instead of taking the Mercedes?
Last edited by balli; 09-29-2009 at 08:43 PM.
i love opposition to a yet to be detailed plan.
This is the same plan voted down 8 years ago warmed over. That's all a 1/8 cent sales tax could buy (if that)
This should have been does AGES AGO. Rather than expanding 281, I-10, 410, there could have been easily an Installed light rail system right in the middle of the highway. It also could have been done at comparable cost and reduced traffic as well. Los Angeles is barely getting their system going and they're paying that price for their late start. The staunch negativity from public transportation in teh south largely transcends from desegregation and the Montgomery bus boycott of the 60's. It's just plain ridiculous that it continues today. If these assholes, yes assholes don't want to be taxed and be part of society, they can just move out of the city.lol, Salt Lake's then proposed light rail line used existing UP tracks from the ty west side of town, out to the suburbs. Before, it was a vacant warehouse and hobo village. Today it's part of a major shopping center.
Like I said, I don't know what exactly is being proposed in San Antonio, but light rail systems move with traffic, they stop at red lights and they yield to cars when applicable. I rarely ever wait for trains any more than I would normally for red lights and the flow of traffic. Besides, light rail trains are small, 2-6 cars. They pose no problem whatsoever.
A picture to illustrate, unsurprisingly you can see development/construction as well.
The people in the picture above are all dyed in the wool, red as blood, mormon and republican; heading home to the suburbs after a long day of work. Yes, I want to pay my incremental taxes so they can take the train instead of driving downtown.
1 line? That's cheap as it gets. Go get some matching stimulus funds or some . Why aren't your local politicians doing their job? Besides, build it and they will come.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTA_TRAXDespite initial skepticism, TRAX now enjoys widespread support. Both the University Line and its extension to the University Medical Center were completed ahead of schedule. Additional expansions have been proposed for the near future, all four of which have been approved and funded. A daily ridership of 15,000 was expected for the initial 15 mile (24 km) line in 1999. Soon after, the expanded system of 17.5 miles (28.2 km) served an estimated 60,000 passengers each day.[7] In the fall of 2005, the large number of passengers caused trains' suspensions to drop, preventing doors from closing properly; the problem has since been corrected.[8] An improved system of counting introduced in 2007 that used infrared sensors to track body heat showed that 60,000 was an overestimation, and the numbers were revised to approximately 40,000.[9] By the third quarter of 2008, the updated ridership totals had climbed to 53,100[10].
For all those pointing to Austin as an example of light rail fail - please dig a little deeper.
The system in Austin may very well fail and is behind schedule and over budget. But it is NOT light rail. It is commuter rail. Two very different things. (SLC and Houston are examples of light rail; South Florida's Tri-Rail system is an example of a [failed] commuter rail system.)
For a lot of back-up info on how ty Austin's rail plan is and the history behind it (from a pro light rail guy who served on the city's Urban Transportation Board) check this blog out:
http://mdahmus.monkeysystems.com/blog/
The problem is that toll roads generate enough revenue to support themselves and light rail doesn't. Especially in Texas where the population densities in the cities are so low. If you want to improve mass transit in San Antonio it can be done for a fraction of the cost by putting more money into buses.
Salt Lake City and San Antonio are two entirely different cities and situations. In Salt Lake pretty much the entire city falls into one giant corridor north and south along I-25. San Antonio has several corridors and not all of them tie into downtown. That means Salt Lake can provide access to a greater percentage of their population with less track than San Antonio can.
san antonio should be more concerned about feeding into the medical center than downtown.
VIA is a corrupt, politicized organization. If you don't think this rail plan is a developer driven initiative you just don't know San Antonio. Once the right people acquire the right property where the "stations" will be the exact plan will be announced.
Thats what I'm saying...instead of coming up with a logical plan that serves the real needs of the community they just want to be trendy and throw "light rail' in from the Dominion to downtown just because the tracks are already there...
It's the identical mistake that Austin made. How many Dominion residents are going to take a train downtown when I-10 is right there?
Oooh wait, let me pull a reverse DarrinS.
Monorails never work. I saw that in an episode of the Simpsons.
I wouldn't really call Houston's system anything other than a TRAM. It's worthless unless you work around med center.
We should give the govt the money to do this. They have our best interests at heart. They only wanna raise our taxes a little, and that'll be it.
And it's either this or toll roads. There are no other options!
But, Toll roads are a great idea too.
2 great options for the peeps. Life is good.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
