Reply With Quote
She was on Laura Ingraham earlier today. It was a taped segment or a "best of" show, and she did pretty good. Never heard of her before today though.
If you haven't seen this chick, your missing the - she's hot, smart and loves Kitties...
She was on Laura Ingraham earlier today. It was a taped segment or a "best of" show, and she did pretty good. Never heard of her before today though.
I'm in love
Further proof of natural selection: The lengths I, or presumably any normal hetero male, would go to, to get to her first.
As a Christian, I agree with basically everything she said. Mr. Douglas is kind of an idiot, but that much is obvious.
Critical thinking, even by a very clever, no-bull blonde, is all it takes to counter the magical, irrational thinking of "Christian" Bible-thumpers.
Charles Darwin film 'too controversial for religious America'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...s-America.html
I wonder how many times she has typed the letters OMG without thinking.
I take it back, i don't care.
Last edited by MiamiHeat; 10-03-2009 at 09:46 PM.
I love when Europeans say boooooool .
That is awesome! Great find, nbadan.
She is married, by the way.
I find her annoying and over-excited.
I also think she has no idea about the meaning of the expression "God given liberties" in the philosophical realm. I think that rebutting the Natural Rights Theory is not as easy as she believes.
Good lookin, whip smart and very opinionated.
Perhaps there is a detectable throb of juvenile self-regard, age appropriate surely -- who, after all is really so interested in thwarting people trying to give away free books on college campuses, and refuting them point for point beforehand on the youtubes?
I like her.
There's no hair tossing in forensics, but she did it to good effect. I thought she was smooth. Animated yes, overacting, no. IMHO.
winehole, peg you about 43 years old?
You been readin my profile.
doesn't say how old you are. so, 43 close?
Is she aware that "We hold these truths to be self-evident (...) that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" is not written on the Bible?
I say no.
Is she aware that the debate about the necessity of the concept of inalienable rights to found the existence of individual liberties has been going on for centuries?
I also say no.
Is she aware about the possible ramifications of her theory that "our liberties are given to us by other people"?
I also don't think so.
She just doesn't look very bright at all.
Maybe you should ask her.
Haranguing us about her intellectual lacunae does neither us nor her any good, mogro.
She was the one who decided to publicize her dubious philosophical theories to the world, wasn't she? She decided to dismiss arguments she apparently dislikes without even caring to understand their meaning. I admire your act of gallant chivalry, but the effectiveness or elegance of my rethorics isn't the issue here.
Ah, the brio of youth.She decided to dismiss arguments she apparently dislikes without even caring to understand their meaning.
"her theory that "our liberties are given to us by other people""
not a theory, but an inarguable fact.
both for liberties and for rights, both completely man-made, man-controlled, man-given and man-denied.
I tend to agree. Unfortunately, a couple of sentences, no matter the degree of assertiveness used to proclaim them, aren't enough to destroy the entire oeuvre of Kant, Hobbes, Aquinas, Locke or Grotius.
It still doesn't excuse her of invoking the Cons ution to make the case.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
