You mean the 2543th win from the Los Angeles Lakers franchise?
First to do it! Celebrate Laker fans!!!
You mean the 2543th win from the Los Angeles Lakers franchise?
The Lakers franchise has won 3000 games. No way out of that I'm afraid.
Nope. You're missing 457 from the Minneapolis days. Don't hate, sucka...you still got two more les. Go rejoice somewhere else.
Where are my manners!?! congrats to Dirk Nowitzki for reaching 20,000pts! Big numbers for the big German! Definitely props to him as well...
1st & best record
3000 / 4849 = 61.9%
See why there're so many haters?![]()
The Lakers are clearly the #1 NBA team in terms of franchise success. 3000 wins, best regular season winning percentage, 15 rings, 30 finals appearances.
No other team can compete with that.
Jealousy is all it is. The Lakers have been in the finals almost 50% of the time the NBA has been in existence! That's insane.
So now the regular season wins matter but when talking about the team of the decade they don't?
Did you miss the part about the 15 rings and 30 finals appearances? The Lakers have appeared in nearly 50% of the NBA finals since the existence of the league.
4 rings and 6 finals appearances, more playoff victories, higher playoff winning percentage and 4-1 head to head in playoff series easily trumps regular season winning percentage.
Last edited by namlook; 01-14-2010 at 10:17 AM.
DAF, the guys a Laker troll. He's just pretending to be a Spur fan. Check out his posts.
Total Troll.
This post tells every Lakers fan what they want to see. Boston Celtics fans are jealous and envious of the Lakers.
The NBA itself recognizes all 15 championships and 3000 wins to belong to the Los Angeles Lakes franchise.
Yet there is a growing movement among Celtics fans to try to say the Lakers only have 10 les, and the ones from Minneapolis don't count. Why? Because the Lakers are steadily creeping up on the Celtics for having the most les in NBA history. Where was this argument 20 years ago when the Celtics led by about 10 les? It wasn't there. That proves my point.
Well, I can tell you one thing, My T-Wolves don't take credit for those Lakers les of 60 years ago. They belong to the Lakers and moved with them, along with all their players and coaches to Los Angeles in 1960.
Anyway, all those old Lakers les are pretty worthless anyway, along with all the old Bill Russell era les. I would say the 5 Mikan rings are worth about 1 le and the 11 Russell rings are worth about 2 les.
I know he's a Lakers fan, I think I've been the first one to call him out. But he isn't pretending to be a Spurs fan, all the comments he makes are all very pro Lakers, I think that he is to dumb to change his team's name.
Me? No, the LAL are.
Los Angeles official banner. I count 10. We have 17. Correct your math.
Shut up troll, go root for the franchise player in Minnesota in whatever sport while he's there because you're sending him to Boston sooner rather than later.
Don't be mad, guy. No matter what you say you're not the NBA and in their record books it has the Lakers' franchise win total at 3,000. To be honest, you're not even credible enough to warrant anything but a laugh out of me. The attempt to discredit something you are in no position leads me to feel sorry for you. It's okay, because deep down inside your pathetic Celtic loving self knows that if Boston was in the same unique situation (to have dominated in two different locales...) you'd be touting past championships as well. Thanks for the morning laugh--it was better than any cup of coffee.
Son, whatever credibility you may have had here is now gone, and you prove my point. You are envious of the Lakers. Don't spout any crap about what went on over 40 years ago when the league was irrelevant, what has your team done since? Not as much as the Lakers, Bulls, and Spurs.Anyway, as I said, the NBA says you're wrong. You know more than the NBA? Wow, let me school you son, everything the Lakers did in Minneapolis belongs to Los Angeles:http://hoopedia.nba.com/index.php?ti...eles_LakersLos Angeles Lakers Conference Western Division Pacific Founded 1946 History Los Angeles Lakers (1960- )Minneapolis Lakers (NBA) (1948-1960)Minneapolis Lakers (NBL) (1947-48)Detroit Gems (NBL) (1946-47) Arena STAPLES Center City Los Angeles, California Colors Purple, Gold, and White Owner Jerry Buss Head Coach Phil Jackson D-League Affiliate Los Angeles D-Fenders NBL Championships 1 (1948) NBA Championships 15 (1949-1950, 1952-1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000-2002, 2009) NBA Conference les 30 (1949-1950, 1952-1954, 1959, 1962-1963, 1965-1966, 1968-1970, 1972, 1973, 1980, 1982-1985, 1987-1989, 1991, 2000-2002, 2004, 2008-2009) Website Lakers.comThe Lakers hold records for having (at the end of the 2007–08 season) the most wins (2,905), the highest winning percentage (61.5%), the most NBA Finals appearances (30), the second fewest non-playoff seasons with five (San Antonio Spurs has four), and the second-most NBA championships with 15, behind the Boston Celtics' 17.
Last edited by Daddy_Of_All_Trolls; 01-14-2010 at 11:58 AM.
Actually, I am more worried about Kurt Rambis sending Kevin Love or Ricky Tubio to the Lakers.However, since you bring it up, we consider our franchise player to now be Brett Favre. We are hoping he wins us a Super Bowl this season. So, tell you what. After the season, win or lose, we'll ship him to the Patriots for Tom Brady. Brett has got to have one le he can produce. Kevin Garnett got you the one he was good for, no more from him for you. You will need Brett, Brady has no mojo for you anymore either. What do you say?
Dirk gets past 20,000 points and Lakers get 3000th win on same night kinda neat
Jealousy.
The Lakers franchise is amazing with all their accomplishments. Makes it even more amazing how such a 1st class franchise can have some an F-Grade fanbase.
As I've said, it's official apparel from the Los Angeles franchise. If you don't like, write to them. There's nothing I can do to help you out.
I don't even know who Brady and Frave are, so I say I don't give a . I know Rambis should be more worried about his job than with trades.
Let me guess you were a die hard back then?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)