Reply With Quote
Odd that the explosions were not visible at all in the video that this wino could see. They were audible in the soundtrack, if you accept that the popping noise referred to by the red cursors, is explosion.
Weak.
Odd that the explosions were not visible at all in the video that this wino could see. They were audible in the soundtrack, if you accept that the popping noise referred to by the red cursors, is explosion.
Weak.
you must be blind. they are evident in every video of the collapses. ive just never seen the one in wtc 7 before shown in that video. ofcourse only the ones who would rather believe the whole thing was carried out Hollywood style complete with headband wearing boxcutter carrying superior muslim pilots BS
So, exactly how long have you been experimenting with LSD?
what im confused about is the trifecta of; footage of the collapses, rubble from the collapses, and statements from people actually there all back up explosives in the three buildings.
yet you wish to say well "you must be on drugs" is your response
Actually, rumor has it they were superior muslims androids... sounds as plausible as your explosions...
the confusion on your part is that you think there were explosions.
I'm a dedicated agnostic.
I believe the two sides -- as if there were only two sides to it and not ten thousand sides -- are probably both wrong. The reining logomachy only distracts from the as yet uninspected truths of the matter.
OK let me see if I can put the dots on the paper for you.....
1.People in the buildings including the civil servents say "there were explosions in the buildings"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
2. Leading up to the collapse explosions could be seen (as shown below)
3. Ofcourse after explosions needed to melt some of the 1.8 million tons of steel in the building there was obviously molten steel laying around the rubble as seen below
The idea that that is a sufficient narrative skips a lot of details, TWF.
Anyway, I already gave you a hint about my orientation. I'm skipping all that bullcrap, and I'm not carrying any water for anybody's bullcrap theory about 9/11.
on the flip side of the coin. Government story is planes hit buildings, fuel heats and weakens trusses, building falls 100% but no sir not just one building THREE buildings. The third building had no jet fuel burning inside but instead damage from the two building falling around it combined with diesel tanks exploding inside the building...how the diesel tanks tucked in the basement of the building were damaged by the fall of the two towers is beyond me ofcourse third building falls and collapses 100% aswell.
you tell me which story sounds like a stretch....the government and media who preach freedom or the peoples story under the rule of this distopian authority...
Yours sounds like total bullcrap to me.
I don't particularly feel the need to go any further than that.
Yes carton figures and calling people names proves factual evidence irrelevent.
Entirely appropriate in this "discussion."
We've already met our quota of grassy knollers.
Be gone.
lol @ factual.
Your gonna have to come stronger than that Mouse...stick with WTC7...that's the key..
What do you think really happened in WTC7, dan?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
