Reply With Quote
cause he didn't the mothers?
why dont they have one shred of dark skin? I dont get it......I watched the Grammys and saw no evidence that they are even his kids.
What do you think?
cause he didn't the mothers?
mccully coughkin is one of the fathers
Big wallet.
OP are you being serious? I don't think anyone actually believes they are biologically his...
Ugh cause they are his kids in "NAME" only...
I think we all pretty much agree that if he was not gay, the man in no way had an affinity for pussy. But he could not even jack off into a cup and let some lab tech artificially inseminate his wife? No way those kids are his.
micheal was an odd man
he's a foreigner from one of the asiatic countries of the eastern hemisphere....cut him some slack
you know they're like 10 years behind us in pop culture issues
mike jack was weird...yeah, I said it...frickin psycho man.
It came out a long time ago that they were not biologically his - they were the product of whatsherface (Debbie Rowe?) and one of Jackson's doctors, who was her boss at the time. I think it was his dermatologist.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
